Sarah Glewis, Senthil Lingaratnam, Benjamin Lee, Ian Campbell, Maarten IJzerman, Mussab Fagery, Sam Harris, Chloe Georgiou, Craig Underhill, Mark Warren, Robert Campbell, Madawa Jayawardana, S. Sandun M. Silva, Jennifer H. Martin, Jeanne Tie, Marliese Alexander, Michael Michael
{"title":"药物遗传学指导下氟嘧啶(DPYD)和伊立替康(UGT1A1*28)化疗对癌症(PACIFIC-PGx)患者的剂量:一项多中心临床试验。","authors":"Sarah Glewis, Senthil Lingaratnam, Benjamin Lee, Ian Campbell, Maarten IJzerman, Mussab Fagery, Sam Harris, Chloe Georgiou, Craig Underhill, Mark Warren, Robert Campbell, Madawa Jayawardana, S. Sandun M. Silva, Jennifer H. Martin, Jeanne Tie, Marliese Alexander, Michael Michael","doi":"10.1111/cts.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>PACIFIC-PGx evaluated the feasibility of implementing pharmacogenetics (PGx) screening in Australia and the impact of <i>DPYD/UGT1A1</i> genotype-guided dosing on severe fluoropyrimidine (FP) and irinotecan-related toxicities and hospitalizations, compared to historical controls. This prospective single arm trial enrolled patients starting FP/irinotecan for any cancer between 7 January 2021 and 25 February 2022 from four Australian hospitals (one metropolitan, three regional). During the accrual period, 462/487 (95%) consecutive patients screened for eligibility for <i>DPYD</i> and 50/109 (46%) for <i>UGT1A1</i> were enrolled and genotyped (feasibility analysis), with 276/462 (60%) for <i>DPYD</i> and 30/50 (60%) for <i>UGT1A1</i> received FP/irinotecan (safety analysis). <i>DPYD</i> genotyping identified 96% (<i>n</i> = 443/462) Wild-Type, 4% (<i>n</i> = 19/462) Intermediate Metabolizers (50% dose reduction), and 0% Poor Metabolizers. <i>UGT1A1</i> genotyping identified 52% (<i>n</i> = 26/50) Wild-Type, 40% (<i>n</i> = 20/50) heterozygous, and 8% (<i>n</i> = 4/50) homozygous (30% dose reduction). Key demographics for the FP/irinotecan safety cohorts included: age range 23–89/34–74 years, male 56%/73%, Caucasian 83%/73%, lower gastrointestinal cancer 50%/57%. Genotype results were reported prior to cycle-1 (96%), average 5–7 days from sample collection. PGx-dosing for <i>DPYD</i> variant allele carriers reduced high-grade toxicities compared to historic controls (7% vs. 39%; OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.024). High-grade toxicities among Wild-Type were similar (14% vs. 14%; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64–1.54, <i>p</i> = 0.490). PGx-dosing reduced FP-related hospitalizations (−22%) and deaths (−3.7%) compared to controls. There were no high-grade toxicities or hospitalizations for <i>UGT1A1*28</i> homozygotes. PGx screening and prescribing were feasible in routine oncology care and improved patient outcomes. Findings may inform expanded PGx programs within cancer and other disease settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing for fluoropyrimidine (DPYD) and irinotecan (UGT1A1*28) chemotherapies for patients with cancer (PACIFIC-PGx): A multicenter clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Glewis, Senthil Lingaratnam, Benjamin Lee, Ian Campbell, Maarten IJzerman, Mussab Fagery, Sam Harris, Chloe Georgiou, Craig Underhill, Mark Warren, Robert Campbell, Madawa Jayawardana, S. Sandun M. Silva, Jennifer H. Martin, Jeanne Tie, Marliese Alexander, Michael Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>PACIFIC-PGx evaluated the feasibility of implementing pharmacogenetics (PGx) screening in Australia and the impact of <i>DPYD/UGT1A1</i> genotype-guided dosing on severe fluoropyrimidine (FP) and irinotecan-related toxicities and hospitalizations, compared to historical controls. This prospective single arm trial enrolled patients starting FP/irinotecan for any cancer between 7 January 2021 and 25 February 2022 from four Australian hospitals (one metropolitan, three regional). During the accrual period, 462/487 (95%) consecutive patients screened for eligibility for <i>DPYD</i> and 50/109 (46%) for <i>UGT1A1</i> were enrolled and genotyped (feasibility analysis), with 276/462 (60%) for <i>DPYD</i> and 30/50 (60%) for <i>UGT1A1</i> received FP/irinotecan (safety analysis). <i>DPYD</i> genotyping identified 96% (<i>n</i> = 443/462) Wild-Type, 4% (<i>n</i> = 19/462) Intermediate Metabolizers (50% dose reduction), and 0% Poor Metabolizers. <i>UGT1A1</i> genotyping identified 52% (<i>n</i> = 26/50) Wild-Type, 40% (<i>n</i> = 20/50) heterozygous, and 8% (<i>n</i> = 4/50) homozygous (30% dose reduction). Key demographics for the FP/irinotecan safety cohorts included: age range 23–89/34–74 years, male 56%/73%, Caucasian 83%/73%, lower gastrointestinal cancer 50%/57%. Genotype results were reported prior to cycle-1 (96%), average 5–7 days from sample collection. PGx-dosing for <i>DPYD</i> variant allele carriers reduced high-grade toxicities compared to historic controls (7% vs. 39%; OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.024). High-grade toxicities among Wild-Type were similar (14% vs. 14%; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64–1.54, <i>p</i> = 0.490). PGx-dosing reduced FP-related hospitalizations (−22%) and deaths (−3.7%) compared to controls. There were no high-grade toxicities or hospitalizations for <i>UGT1A1*28</i> homozygotes. PGx screening and prescribing were feasible in routine oncology care and improved patient outcomes. Findings may inform expanded PGx programs within cancer and other disease settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"17 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70083\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
PACIFIC-PGx评估了在澳大利亚实施药物遗传学(PGx)筛查的可行性,以及与历史对照相比,DPYD/UGT1A1基因型指导给药对严重氟嘧啶(FP)和伊立替康相关毒性和住院治疗的影响。这项前瞻性单臂试验招募了2021年1月7日至2022年2月25日期间在澳大利亚四家医院(一家大都市医院,三家地区医院)接受FP/伊立替康治疗任何癌症的患者。在累积期间,462/487(95%)连续筛选符合DPYD和50/109 (46%)UGT1A1的患者入组并进行基因分型(可行性分析),其中276/462 (60%)DPYD和30/50 (60%)UGT1A1患者接受FP/伊立替康(安全性分析)。DPYD基因分型鉴定出96% (n = 443/462)为野生型,4% (n = 19/462)为中间代谢物(剂量减少50%),0%为不良代谢物。UGT1A1基因分型鉴定52% (n = 26/50)为野生型,40% (n = 20/50)为杂合子,8% (n = 4/50)为纯合子(剂量减少30%)。FP/伊立替康安全性队列的关键人口统计数据包括:年龄范围23-89/34-74岁,男性56%/73%,高加索人83%/73%,下消化道肿瘤患者50%/57%。基因型结果在第1周期(96%)之前报告,平均在样本采集后5-7天。与历史对照组相比,DPYD变异等位基因携带者的pgx剂量降低了高级别毒性(7% vs 39%;OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.97, p = 0.024)。野生型的高级别毒性相似(14% vs. 14%;OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64-1.54, p = 0.490)。与对照组相比,pgx剂量降低了与fp相关的住院率(-22%)和死亡率(-3.7%)。UGT1A1*28纯合子无严重毒性或住院。PGx筛查和处方在常规肿瘤护理中是可行的,并改善了患者的预后。研究结果可能为癌症和其他疾病环境中扩大PGx项目提供信息。
Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing for fluoropyrimidine (DPYD) and irinotecan (UGT1A1*28) chemotherapies for patients with cancer (PACIFIC-PGx): A multicenter clinical trial
PACIFIC-PGx evaluated the feasibility of implementing pharmacogenetics (PGx) screening in Australia and the impact of DPYD/UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing on severe fluoropyrimidine (FP) and irinotecan-related toxicities and hospitalizations, compared to historical controls. This prospective single arm trial enrolled patients starting FP/irinotecan for any cancer between 7 January 2021 and 25 February 2022 from four Australian hospitals (one metropolitan, three regional). During the accrual period, 462/487 (95%) consecutive patients screened for eligibility for DPYD and 50/109 (46%) for UGT1A1 were enrolled and genotyped (feasibility analysis), with 276/462 (60%) for DPYD and 30/50 (60%) for UGT1A1 received FP/irinotecan (safety analysis). DPYD genotyping identified 96% (n = 443/462) Wild-Type, 4% (n = 19/462) Intermediate Metabolizers (50% dose reduction), and 0% Poor Metabolizers. UGT1A1 genotyping identified 52% (n = 26/50) Wild-Type, 40% (n = 20/50) heterozygous, and 8% (n = 4/50) homozygous (30% dose reduction). Key demographics for the FP/irinotecan safety cohorts included: age range 23–89/34–74 years, male 56%/73%, Caucasian 83%/73%, lower gastrointestinal cancer 50%/57%. Genotype results were reported prior to cycle-1 (96%), average 5–7 days from sample collection. PGx-dosing for DPYD variant allele carriers reduced high-grade toxicities compared to historic controls (7% vs. 39%; OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.97, p = 0.024). High-grade toxicities among Wild-Type were similar (14% vs. 14%; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64–1.54, p = 0.490). PGx-dosing reduced FP-related hospitalizations (−22%) and deaths (−3.7%) compared to controls. There were no high-grade toxicities or hospitalizations for UGT1A1*28 homozygotes. PGx screening and prescribing were feasible in routine oncology care and improved patient outcomes. Findings may inform expanded PGx programs within cancer and other disease settings.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.