HYBRIDknife flex在猪食管内镜粘膜下解剖模型中的安全性和性能:一项初步研究

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70036
Christopher J L Khor, Katsuro Ichimasa, Stephen K K Tsao, Ulrich Biber, Yutaka Saito
{"title":"HYBRIDknife flex在猪食管内镜粘膜下解剖模型中的安全性和性能:一项初步研究","authors":"Christopher J L Khor,&nbsp;Katsuro Ichimasa,&nbsp;Stephen K K Tsao,&nbsp;Ulrich Biber,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the best modality for achieving en bloc resection of larger neoplastic mucosal lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Multiple devices are available for ESD, and refinements continue to be made to develop devices that improve the safety and efficiency of performing ESD. Submucosal injection with viscous fluids like glycerol, which prolong submucosal expansion, could facilitate the procedure. We aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex, which combines electrosurgical dissection with waterjet-assisted injection in a slim and flexible form factor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a prospective animal study with six pigs, four endoscopists, each with 10–20 years of experience in ESD, performed 28 esophageal ESDs. One half was performed with physiological saline injectate, the other half with fructose-added glycerol. Various performance aspects were evaluated on a five-point scale [5 = best], including dissection properties, handling, and usability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No perforations or major bleeding occurred. All resections were performed en bloc, with one technical failure (3.6%, 1 of 28). Performance scores were similar for saline and glycerol (4.5 ± 0.31 vs. 4.5 ± 0.32, <i>P</i> = 0.36), as was dissection speed (13 ± 6.2 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 15 ± 6.1 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> = 0.22).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We demonstrated that esophageal ESD can be performed safely and rapidly using HYBRIDknife flex, with excellent performance evaluation by the endoscopists. Combining this device with glycerol or saline is precise and effective for ESD, although experience could compensate for the theoretical disadvantage of using normal saline.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and performance of the HYBRIDknife flex in a porcine model of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J L Khor,&nbsp;Katsuro Ichimasa,&nbsp;Stephen K K Tsao,&nbsp;Ulrich Biber,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the best modality for achieving en bloc resection of larger neoplastic mucosal lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Multiple devices are available for ESD, and refinements continue to be made to develop devices that improve the safety and efficiency of performing ESD. Submucosal injection with viscous fluids like glycerol, which prolong submucosal expansion, could facilitate the procedure. We aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex, which combines electrosurgical dissection with waterjet-assisted injection in a slim and flexible form factor.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a prospective animal study with six pigs, four endoscopists, each with 10–20 years of experience in ESD, performed 28 esophageal ESDs. One half was performed with physiological saline injectate, the other half with fructose-added glycerol. Various performance aspects were evaluated on a five-point scale [5 = best], including dissection properties, handling, and usability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No perforations or major bleeding occurred. All resections were performed en bloc, with one technical failure (3.6%, 1 of 28). Performance scores were similar for saline and glycerol (4.5 ± 0.31 vs. 4.5 ± 0.32, <i>P</i> = 0.36), as was dissection speed (13 ± 6.2 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 15 ± 6.1 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> = 0.22).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We demonstrated that esophageal ESD can be performed safely and rapidly using HYBRIDknife flex, with excellent performance evaluation by the endoscopists. Combining this device with glycerol or saline is precise and effective for ESD, although experience could compensate for the theoretical disadvantage of using normal saline.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)被认为是实现上下胃肠道较大肿瘤粘膜病变整体切除的最佳方式。用于ESD的器件有多种,并且不断改进以开发提高ESD执行安全性和效率的器件。粘膜下注射黏性液体如甘油,可延长粘膜下扩张,可促进手术。我们旨在评估新型Erbe HYBRIDknife®flex的安全性和性能,该产品将电外科解剖与水射流辅助注射相结合,具有纤细灵活的外形。方法在一项有6头猪的前瞻性动物研究中,4名具有10-20年ESD经验的内镜医师对28例食管ESD进行了手术。一半用生理盐水注射,另一半用果糖加甘油注射。各种性能方面以五分制进行评估[5 =最佳],包括解剖性能,处理和可用性。结果无穿孔及大出血发生。所有手术全部完成,1例技术失败(3.6%,1 / 28)。生理盐水和甘油的性能评分相似(4.5±0.31比4.5±0.32,P = 0.36),解剖速度相似(13±6.2 mm2/min比15±6.1 mm2/min, P = 0.22)。结论使用HYBRIDknife flex可以安全、快速地完成食管ESD手术,内镜医师对其具有良好的评价。将该装置与甘油或生理盐水结合使用对于ESD是精确和有效的,尽管经验可以弥补使用生理盐水的理论上的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and performance of the HYBRIDknife flex in a porcine model of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A pilot study

Background and Aim

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the best modality for achieving en bloc resection of larger neoplastic mucosal lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Multiple devices are available for ESD, and refinements continue to be made to develop devices that improve the safety and efficiency of performing ESD. Submucosal injection with viscous fluids like glycerol, which prolong submucosal expansion, could facilitate the procedure. We aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex, which combines electrosurgical dissection with waterjet-assisted injection in a slim and flexible form factor.

Methods

In a prospective animal study with six pigs, four endoscopists, each with 10–20 years of experience in ESD, performed 28 esophageal ESDs. One half was performed with physiological saline injectate, the other half with fructose-added glycerol. Various performance aspects were evaluated on a five-point scale [5 = best], including dissection properties, handling, and usability.

Results

No perforations or major bleeding occurred. All resections were performed en bloc, with one technical failure (3.6%, 1 of 28). Performance scores were similar for saline and glycerol (4.5 ± 0.31 vs. 4.5 ± 0.32, P = 0.36), as was dissection speed (13 ± 6.2 mm2/min vs. 15 ± 6.1 mm2/min, P = 0.22).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that esophageal ESD can be performed safely and rapidly using HYBRIDknife flex, with excellent performance evaluation by the endoscopists. Combining this device with glycerol or saline is precise and effective for ESD, although experience could compensate for the theoretical disadvantage of using normal saline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Large Friable Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor Complicated by Hemorrhagic Shock: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature Efficacy of Metal Stents Versus Plastic Stents for Treatment of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Causal Exposures in Pancreatic Cancer Incidence: Insights From Mendelian Randomization Studies Can Peritoneal Biopsy Diagnose Atypical Cases of Familial Mediterranean Fever?: A Case Report Malnutrition and Associated Factors Among Patients With Cirrhosis at a Tertiary Care Center in Addis Ababa Ethiopia: An Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1