Bertin Takoutsing, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Ermias Aynekulu, Keith D. Shepherd
{"title":"模拟和绘制玉米产量图,并根据不确定的土壤信息提出肥料建议","authors":"Bertin Takoutsing, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Ermias Aynekulu, Keith D. Shepherd","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10200-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop models can improve our understanding of crop responses to environmental conditions and farming practices. However, uncertainties in model inputs can notably impact the quality of the outputs. This study aimed at quantifying the uncertainty in soil information and analyse how it propagates through the Quantitative Evaluation of Fertility of Tropical Soils model to affect yield and fertilizer recommendation rates using Monte Carlo simulation. Additional objectives were to analyse the uncertainty contributions of the individual soil inputs to model output uncertainty and discuss strategies to communicate uncertainty to end-users. The results showed that the impact of soil input uncertainty on model output uncertainty was significant and varied spatially. Comparison of the results of a deterministic model run with the mean of the Monte Carlo simulation runs showed systematic differences in yield predictions, with Monte Carlo simulations on average predicting a yield that was 0.62 tonnes ha<sup>−1</sup> lower than the deterministic run. Similar systematic differences were observed for fertilizer recommendations, with Monte Carlo simulations recommending up to 59, 42, and 20 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> lower nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) fertilizer applications, respectively. Stochastic sensitivity analysis showed that pH was the main source of uncertainty for K fertilizer (81.6%) and that soil organic carbon contributed most to the uncertainty of N fertilizer application (97%). Uncertainty in P fertilizer application mostly came from uncertainty in extractable phosphorus (55%) and exchangeable potassium (20%). A threshold probability map designed using statistical predictions served as a visual aid that could enable farmers to swiftly make informed decisions about fertilizer application locations. The study highlights the importance of refining the accuracy of soil maps as well as incorporating uncertainty in input data, which improves QUEFTS model predictions and offers valuable insights into the relationship between soil information accuracy and reliable crop modeling for sustainable agricultural decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling and mapping maize yields and making fertilizer recommendations with uncertain soil information\",\"authors\":\"Bertin Takoutsing, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Ermias Aynekulu, Keith D. Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10200-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Crop models can improve our understanding of crop responses to environmental conditions and farming practices. However, uncertainties in model inputs can notably impact the quality of the outputs. This study aimed at quantifying the uncertainty in soil information and analyse how it propagates through the Quantitative Evaluation of Fertility of Tropical Soils model to affect yield and fertilizer recommendation rates using Monte Carlo simulation. Additional objectives were to analyse the uncertainty contributions of the individual soil inputs to model output uncertainty and discuss strategies to communicate uncertainty to end-users. The results showed that the impact of soil input uncertainty on model output uncertainty was significant and varied spatially. Comparison of the results of a deterministic model run with the mean of the Monte Carlo simulation runs showed systematic differences in yield predictions, with Monte Carlo simulations on average predicting a yield that was 0.62 tonnes ha<sup>−1</sup> lower than the deterministic run. Similar systematic differences were observed for fertilizer recommendations, with Monte Carlo simulations recommending up to 59, 42, and 20 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> lower nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) fertilizer applications, respectively. Stochastic sensitivity analysis showed that pH was the main source of uncertainty for K fertilizer (81.6%) and that soil organic carbon contributed most to the uncertainty of N fertilizer application (97%). Uncertainty in P fertilizer application mostly came from uncertainty in extractable phosphorus (55%) and exchangeable potassium (20%). A threshold probability map designed using statistical predictions served as a visual aid that could enable farmers to swiftly make informed decisions about fertilizer application locations. The study highlights the importance of refining the accuracy of soil maps as well as incorporating uncertainty in input data, which improves QUEFTS model predictions and offers valuable insights into the relationship between soil information accuracy and reliable crop modeling for sustainable agricultural decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10200-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10200-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作物模型可以提高我们对作物对环境条件和耕作方式的反应的理解。然而,模型输入中的不确定性会显著影响输出的质量。本研究旨在量化土壤信息中的不确定性,并利用蒙特卡洛模拟分析其如何通过热带土壤肥力定量评估模型传播,从而影响产量和肥料推荐率。其他目标是分析单个土壤输入对模型输出不确定性的不确定性贡献,并讨论将不确定性传达给最终用户的策略。结果表明:土壤输入不确定性对模型输出不确定性的影响显著,且存在空间差异。将确定性模型运行的结果与蒙特卡罗模拟运行的平均值进行比较,显示出产量预测的系统性差异,蒙特卡罗模拟平均预测的产量比确定性运行低0.62吨ha - 1。在肥料建议方面也观察到类似的系统差异,蒙特卡罗模拟建议分别减少氮肥(N)、磷(P)和钾(K)施用59、42和20 kg ha - 1。随机敏感性分析表明,pH是钾肥不确定性的主要来源(81.6%),土壤有机碳对氮肥不确定性的贡献最大(97%)。磷肥施用的不确定性主要来自可提取磷(55%)和交换性钾(20%)的不确定性。使用统计预测设计的阈值概率图作为视觉辅助工具,可以使农民迅速做出有关施肥地点的明智决定。该研究强调了提高土壤图准确性以及将不确定性纳入输入数据的重要性,这可以提高QUEFTS模型的预测,并为土壤信息准确性和可靠的作物建模之间的关系提供有价值的见解,以促进可持续农业决策。
Modelling and mapping maize yields and making fertilizer recommendations with uncertain soil information
Crop models can improve our understanding of crop responses to environmental conditions and farming practices. However, uncertainties in model inputs can notably impact the quality of the outputs. This study aimed at quantifying the uncertainty in soil information and analyse how it propagates through the Quantitative Evaluation of Fertility of Tropical Soils model to affect yield and fertilizer recommendation rates using Monte Carlo simulation. Additional objectives were to analyse the uncertainty contributions of the individual soil inputs to model output uncertainty and discuss strategies to communicate uncertainty to end-users. The results showed that the impact of soil input uncertainty on model output uncertainty was significant and varied spatially. Comparison of the results of a deterministic model run with the mean of the Monte Carlo simulation runs showed systematic differences in yield predictions, with Monte Carlo simulations on average predicting a yield that was 0.62 tonnes ha−1 lower than the deterministic run. Similar systematic differences were observed for fertilizer recommendations, with Monte Carlo simulations recommending up to 59, 42, and 20 kg ha−1 lower nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) fertilizer applications, respectively. Stochastic sensitivity analysis showed that pH was the main source of uncertainty for K fertilizer (81.6%) and that soil organic carbon contributed most to the uncertainty of N fertilizer application (97%). Uncertainty in P fertilizer application mostly came from uncertainty in extractable phosphorus (55%) and exchangeable potassium (20%). A threshold probability map designed using statistical predictions served as a visual aid that could enable farmers to swiftly make informed decisions about fertilizer application locations. The study highlights the importance of refining the accuracy of soil maps as well as incorporating uncertainty in input data, which improves QUEFTS model predictions and offers valuable insights into the relationship between soil information accuracy and reliable crop modeling for sustainable agricultural decisions.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.