Nicolab的StrokeViewer在英国发展中的中风血栓切除服务的介绍和准确性评估。服务开发/改进项目

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106745
A. Karamitros , L.M.C. Flynn , A. Cox , C. Hawkes , A. Nania
{"title":"Nicolab的StrokeViewer在英国发展中的中风血栓切除服务的介绍和准确性评估。服务开发/改进项目","authors":"A. Karamitros ,&nbsp;L.M.C. Flynn ,&nbsp;A. Cox ,&nbsp;C. Hawkes ,&nbsp;A. Nania","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) software in a quaternary stroke centre as well as assess the accuracy and efficacy of StrokeViewer software in large vessel occlusion detection and its potential impact on radiological workflow.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>Data were collected during two separate three-month periods comparing the accuracy rate of StrokeViewer in detection of large vessel occlusion to that of a junior registrar. During the first three months, 37 cases were identified and during the second leg, 47. The second leg of the study was performed due to a high number of technical failures during the first one and in an attempt to improve those via communication with the manufacturer and co-operation between allied healthcare professionals. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Technical failure rate was 25% in the first leg and reduced to 17% in the second leg, showing a trend to statistical significance. Specificity and sensitivity of StrokeViewer were similar in the two legs of the study, measuring 91% and 93% initially and 94% and 93% finally, respectively. Efficacy was comparable to that of the junior registrar with StrokeViewer, demonstrating 92% accuracy during the first leg vs 95% by the junior registrar and 93% in the second leg vs 98% by the junior registrar. These did not show statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>This is a real-life analysis of StrokeViewer efficacy and its potential failures, showing a reduction in failure rate, accuracy rate of a junior registrar, and sensitivity and specificity values close to the advertised ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 106745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction and accuracy assessment of Nicolab's StrokeViewer in a developing stroke thrombectomy UK service. a service development/improvement project\",\"authors\":\"A. Karamitros ,&nbsp;L.M.C. Flynn ,&nbsp;A. Cox ,&nbsp;C. Hawkes ,&nbsp;A. Nania\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) software in a quaternary stroke centre as well as assess the accuracy and efficacy of StrokeViewer software in large vessel occlusion detection and its potential impact on radiological workflow.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>Data were collected during two separate three-month periods comparing the accuracy rate of StrokeViewer in detection of large vessel occlusion to that of a junior registrar. During the first three months, 37 cases were identified and during the second leg, 47. The second leg of the study was performed due to a high number of technical failures during the first one and in an attempt to improve those via communication with the manufacturer and co-operation between allied healthcare professionals. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Technical failure rate was 25% in the first leg and reduced to 17% in the second leg, showing a trend to statistical significance. Specificity and sensitivity of StrokeViewer were similar in the two legs of the study, measuring 91% and 93% initially and 94% and 93% finally, respectively. Efficacy was comparable to that of the junior registrar with StrokeViewer, demonstrating 92% accuracy during the first leg vs 95% by the junior registrar and 93% in the second leg vs 98% by the junior registrar. These did not show statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>This is a real-life analysis of StrokeViewer efficacy and its potential failures, showing a reduction in failure rate, accuracy rate of a junior registrar, and sensitivity and specificity values close to the advertised ones.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估人工智能(AI)软件在四级脑卒中中心的实施情况,并评估StrokeViewer软件在大血管闭塞检测中的准确性和有效性及其对放射工作流程的潜在影响。材料和方法在两个独立的三个月期间收集数据,比较StrokeViewer在检测大血管闭塞方面的准确率与初级注册器的准确率。前三个月确诊37例,第二阶段确诊47例。由于在第一阶段中出现了大量的技术故障,因此进行了第二阶段的研究,并试图通过与制造商的沟通和联合医疗保健专业人员之间的合作来改进这些故障。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。结果第一段技术故障率为25%,第二段技术故障率为17%,差异有统计学意义。StrokeViewer的特异性和敏感性在两组研究中相似,初始为91%和93%,最终为94%和93%。疗效与使用StrokeViewer的初级注册者相当,第一阶段的准确率为92%,初级注册者为95%,第二阶段为93%,初级注册者为98%。这些差异无统计学意义。结论:这是对StrokeViewer疗效及其潜在故障的现实分析,显示出故障率的降低,初级注册师的准确率,敏感性和特异性值接近广告值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction and accuracy assessment of Nicolab's StrokeViewer in a developing stroke thrombectomy UK service. a service development/improvement project

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) software in a quaternary stroke centre as well as assess the accuracy and efficacy of StrokeViewer software in large vessel occlusion detection and its potential impact on radiological workflow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected during two separate three-month periods comparing the accuracy rate of StrokeViewer in detection of large vessel occlusion to that of a junior registrar. During the first three months, 37 cases were identified and during the second leg, 47. The second leg of the study was performed due to a high number of technical failures during the first one and in an attempt to improve those via communication with the manufacturer and co-operation between allied healthcare professionals. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Technical failure rate was 25% in the first leg and reduced to 17% in the second leg, showing a trend to statistical significance. Specificity and sensitivity of StrokeViewer were similar in the two legs of the study, measuring 91% and 93% initially and 94% and 93% finally, respectively. Efficacy was comparable to that of the junior registrar with StrokeViewer, demonstrating 92% accuracy during the first leg vs 95% by the junior registrar and 93% in the second leg vs 98% by the junior registrar. These did not show statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

This is a real-life analysis of StrokeViewer efficacy and its potential failures, showing a reduction in failure rate, accuracy rate of a junior registrar, and sensitivity and specificity values close to the advertised ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "CT histogram analysis to distinguish between acute intracerebral hemorrhage and cavernous hemangioma" [Clin Radiol 79 (11) (2024) e872-e879]. Re: Utility of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for assessing bony lesions of skull base and calvarium. Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis Safety of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in patients treated for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma with the need for pre-procedural ureteral stenting: an international cohort study Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1