Warren T. McKinney, Kareena Israni, Cory R. Schaffhausen, David P. Schladt, Grace R. Lyden, Arthur Matas, Jack Wolf, Sandra Japuntich, Ajay K. Israni
{"title":"随机对照试验评估支持移植中心患者决策的新工具","authors":"Warren T. McKinney, Kareena Israni, Cory R. Schaffhausen, David P. Schladt, Grace R. Lyden, Arthur Matas, Jack Wolf, Sandra Japuntich, Ajay K. Israni","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI >40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers\",\"authors\":\"Warren T. McKinney, Kareena Israni, Cory R. Schaffhausen, David P. Schladt, Grace R. Lyden, Arthur Matas, Jack Wolf, Sandra Japuntich, Ajay K. Israni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI >40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
患者并不总是知道列出的标准,并在移植项目中提供接受。由于各中心有不同的候选标准,年龄和体重指数等因素会影响移植的获得。因此,我们创建了一个移植中心搜索工具(transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST)来帮助患者找到移植项目的比较信息。我们进行了一项交叉随机对照试验(RCT),以评估在两个中心寻求肾脏移植的成年人中,与现有的移植接受者科学注册网站相比,TCST是否提高了理解能力。为了评估理解能力,参与者被要求使用TCST和SRTR网站来确定在预先指定的区域内哪个移植项目中70岁以上的受者最多;以及哪些项目的受助人BMI指数为40。参与者被要求提供使用这两个网站的定性反馈。68名候选人参加了随机对照试验。与现有的SRTR网站相比,使用TCST时,参与者更有可能识别正确的程序(OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87-35.33)。参与者表示他们更喜欢TCST而不是SRTR网站(分别为52.9%对25.0%,p = 0.009)。随着理解的增加,患者将更好地确定移植病人喜欢他们的项目。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03610555
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers
Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI >40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, p = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.