随机对照试验评估支持移植中心患者决策的新工具

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70043
Warren T. McKinney, Kareena Israni, Cory R. Schaffhausen, David P. Schladt, Grace R. Lyden, Arthur Matas, Jack Wolf, Sandra Japuntich, Ajay K. Israni
{"title":"随机对照试验评估支持移植中心患者决策的新工具","authors":"Warren T. McKinney,&nbsp;Kareena Israni,&nbsp;Cory R. Schaffhausen,&nbsp;David P. Schladt,&nbsp;Grace R. Lyden,&nbsp;Arthur Matas,&nbsp;Jack Wolf,&nbsp;Sandra Japuntich,&nbsp;Ajay K. Israni","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI &gt;40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers\",\"authors\":\"Warren T. McKinney,&nbsp;Kareena Israni,&nbsp;Cory R. Schaffhausen,&nbsp;David P. Schladt,&nbsp;Grace R. Lyden,&nbsp;Arthur Matas,&nbsp;Jack Wolf,&nbsp;Sandra Japuntich,&nbsp;Ajay K. Israni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI &gt;40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者并不总是知道列出的标准,并在移植项目中提供接受。由于各中心有不同的候选标准,年龄和体重指数等因素会影响移植的获得。因此,我们创建了一个移植中心搜索工具(transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST)来帮助患者找到移植项目的比较信息。我们进行了一项交叉随机对照试验(RCT),以评估在两个中心寻求肾脏移植的成年人中,与现有的移植接受者科学注册网站相比,TCST是否提高了理解能力。为了评估理解能力,参与者被要求使用TCST和SRTR网站来确定在预先指定的区域内哪个移植项目中70岁以上的受者最多;以及哪些项目的受助人BMI指数为40。参与者被要求提供使用这两个网站的定性反馈。68名候选人参加了随机对照试验。与现有的SRTR网站相比,使用TCST时,参与者更有可能识别正确的程序(OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87-35.33)。参与者表示他们更喜欢TCST而不是SRTR网站(分别为52.9%对25.0%,p = 0.009)。随着理解的增加,患者将更好地确定移植病人喜欢他们的项目。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03610555
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers

Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI >40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87–35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, p = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1