Suja S. Rajan PhD, Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD, Mengxi Wang PhD, MS, Jeffrey L. Saver MD, Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH, Nicole R. Gonzales MD, Nneka Ifejika MD, Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN, Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS, Michael O. Gonzalez MS, David R. Lairson PhD, Patti L. Bratina RN, William J. Jones MD, Jason S. Mackey MD, Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW, Babak B. Navi MD, Ann W. Alexandrov PhD, Andrei Alexandrov MD, May Nour MD, PhD, Ilana Spokoyny MD, Ritvij Bowry MD, Alexandra L. Czap MD, James C. Grotta MD
{"title":"一项前瞻性多中心分析移动卒中单元成本-效果。","authors":"Suja S. Rajan PhD, Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD, Mengxi Wang PhD, MS, Jeffrey L. Saver MD, Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH, Nicole R. Gonzales MD, Nneka Ifejika MD, Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN, Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS, Michael O. Gonzalez MS, David R. Lairson PhD, Patti L. Bratina RN, William J. Jones MD, Jason S. Mackey MD, Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW, Babak B. Navi MD, Ann W. Alexandrov PhD, Andrei Alexandrov MD, May Nour MD, PhD, Ilana Spokoyny MD, Ritvij Bowry MD, Alexandra L. Czap MD, James C. Grotta MD","doi":"10.1002/ana.27105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":"97 2","pages":"209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Suja S. Rajan PhD, Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD, Mengxi Wang PhD, MS, Jeffrey L. Saver MD, Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH, Nicole R. Gonzales MD, Nneka Ifejika MD, Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN, Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS, Michael O. Gonzalez MS, David R. Lairson PhD, Patti L. Bratina RN, William J. Jones MD, Jason S. Mackey MD, Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW, Babak B. Navi MD, Ann W. Alexandrov PhD, Andrei Alexandrov MD, May Nour MD, PhD, Ilana Spokoyny MD, Ritvij Bowry MD, Alexandra L. Czap MD, James C. Grotta MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.27105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"97 2\",\"pages\":\"209-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.27105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.27105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness
Objective
Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).
Methods
This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.
Results
The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.
Interpretation
MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221
期刊介绍:
Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.