一项前瞻性多中心分析移动卒中单元成本-效果。

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/ana.27105
Suja S. Rajan PhD, Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD, Mengxi Wang PhD, MS, Jeffrey L. Saver MD, Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH, Nicole R. Gonzales MD, Nneka Ifejika MD, Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN, Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS, Michael O. Gonzalez MS, David R. Lairson PhD, Patti L. Bratina RN, William J. Jones MD, Jason S. Mackey MD, Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW, Babak B. Navi MD, Ann W. Alexandrov PhD, Andrei Alexandrov MD, May Nour MD, PhD, Ilana Spokoyny MD, Ritvij Bowry MD, Alexandra L. Czap MD, James C. Grotta MD
{"title":"一项前瞻性多中心分析移动卒中单元成本-效果。","authors":"Suja S. Rajan PhD,&nbsp;Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD,&nbsp;Mengxi Wang PhD, MS,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Saver MD,&nbsp;Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH,&nbsp;Nicole R. Gonzales MD,&nbsp;Nneka Ifejika MD,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN,&nbsp;Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS,&nbsp;Michael O. Gonzalez MS,&nbsp;David R. Lairson PhD,&nbsp;Patti L. Bratina RN,&nbsp;William J. Jones MD,&nbsp;Jason S. Mackey MD,&nbsp;Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW,&nbsp;Babak B. Navi MD,&nbsp;Ann W. Alexandrov PhD,&nbsp;Andrei Alexandrov MD,&nbsp;May Nour MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ilana Spokoyny MD,&nbsp;Ritvij Bowry MD,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Czap MD,&nbsp;James C. Grotta MD","doi":"10.1002/ana.27105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":"97 2","pages":"209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Suja S. Rajan PhD,&nbsp;Jose-Miguel Yamal PhD,&nbsp;Mengxi Wang PhD, MS,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Saver MD,&nbsp;Asha P. Jacob MD, MPH,&nbsp;Nicole R. Gonzales MD,&nbsp;Nneka Ifejika MD,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Parker MHA, BSN, RN,&nbsp;Christopher Ganey PharmD, MS,&nbsp;Michael O. Gonzalez MS,&nbsp;David R. Lairson PhD,&nbsp;Patti L. Bratina RN,&nbsp;William J. Jones MD,&nbsp;Jason S. Mackey MD,&nbsp;Mackenzie P. Lerario MD, LMSW,&nbsp;Babak B. Navi MD,&nbsp;Ann W. Alexandrov PhD,&nbsp;Andrei Alexandrov MD,&nbsp;May Nour MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ilana Spokoyny MD,&nbsp;Ritvij Bowry MD,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Czap MD,&nbsp;James C. Grotta MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.27105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"97 2\",\"pages\":\"209-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.27105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.27105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:鉴于缺血性脑卒中的高疾病负担和费用负担,评估预防和治疗缺血性脑卒中新方法的临床疗效和成本效益至关重要。有效的缺血性卒中管理取决于卒中发作后及时使用溶栓药物。与通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)进行的标准管理相比,本研究评估了与使用移动卒中单元(msu)加快组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)给药相关的成本效益。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、隔周、集群对照的MSU与EMS对照试验。采用增量成本-效果比(ICER)方法,从CMS医疗保险的角度进行1年和终生成本-效果分析。使用患者报告的EQ-5D-5L数据估计的质量调整生命年(QALYs)作为有效性度量。利用全国医疗保险平均报销额将医疗保健利用转换为成本。ICERs排除了已有残疾的患者,并且仅限于中风相关的费用。结果:使用MSU组和EMS组之间的总成本差异,所有符合tpa条件的患者的第一年ICER为238,873美元/QALY;无既往残疾的患者为61,199美元/QALY。所有符合tpa条件的患者和没有预先存在残疾的患者的终生ICERs分别为94,710美元/QALY和31,259美元/QALY。当仅限于卒中相关费用时,所有ICERs都较低,并且高度依赖于每年在MSU治疗的患者数量。解释:如果我们考虑所有符合tpa条件的患者第一年的总成本和结果,MSUs的成本效益是边缘的。当计算基于没有预先存在的残疾的患者、患者的生命周期、卒中相关费用和每年在MSU治疗的患者数量时,MSU具有成本效益到高度成本效益。Ann neurol 2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness

Objective

Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).

Methods

This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.

Results

The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.

Interpretation

MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209–221

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
A Multicenter Study of Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis in China. Brain Metabolic Features of FUS-ALS: A 2-[18F]FDG-PET Study. Longitudinal Metabolomics in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Implicates Impaired Lipid Metabolism. Post-Dissection Double Carotid Lumen With Inversed Slow Flow in the False Lumen Associated with Stroke. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1