评估新抗菌剂的价值:对Cefiderocol和Ceftazidime-Avibactam的评估,以告知英国NHS的非相关支付。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x
Beth Woods, Ben Kearns, Laetitia Schmitt, Dina Jankovic, Claire Rothery, Sue Harnan, Jean Hamilton, Alison Scope, Shijie Ren, Laura Bojke, Mark Wilcox, William Hope, Colm Leonard, Philip Howard, David Jenkins, Alan Ashworth, Andrew Bentley, Mark Sculpher
{"title":"评估新抗菌剂的价值:对Cefiderocol和Ceftazidime-Avibactam的评估,以告知英国NHS的非相关支付。","authors":"Beth Woods,&nbsp;Ben Kearns,&nbsp;Laetitia Schmitt,&nbsp;Dina Jankovic,&nbsp;Claire Rothery,&nbsp;Sue Harnan,&nbsp;Jean Hamilton,&nbsp;Alison Scope,&nbsp;Shijie Ren,&nbsp;Laura Bojke,&nbsp;Mark Wilcox,&nbsp;William Hope,&nbsp;Colm Leonard,&nbsp;Philip Howard,&nbsp;David Jenkins,&nbsp;Alan Ashworth,&nbsp;Andrew Bentley,&nbsp;Mark Sculpher","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The UK has recently established subscription-payment agreements for two antimicrobials: cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam. This article summarises the novel value assessments that informed this process and lessons learned for future pricing and funding decisions.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The evaluations used decision modelling to predict population incremental net health effects (INHEs), informed by systematic reviews, evidence syntheses, national surveillance data and structured expert elicitation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant challenges faced during the development of the evaluations led to profound uncertainty in the estimates of INHEs. The value assessment required definition of the population expected to receive the new antimicrobials; estimating value within this heterogenous population; assessing comparative efficacy using antimicrobial susceptibility data due to the absence of relevant clinical data; and predicting population-level benefits despite poor data on current numbers of drug-resistant infections and uncertainties around emerging resistance. Though both antimicrobials offer the potential to treat multi-drug resistant infections, the benefits estimated were modest due to the rarity of true pan-resistance, low life expectancy of the patient population and difficulty of identifying and quantifying additional sources of value.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assessing the population INHEs of new antimicrobials was complex and resource intensive. Future evaluations should continue to assemble evidence relating to areas of expected usage, patient numbers over time and comparative effectiveness and safety. Projections of patient numbers could be greatly enhanced by the development of national level linked clinical, prescribing and laboratory data. A practical approach to synthesising these data would be to combine expert assessments of key parameters with a simple generic decision model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":"23 1","pages":"5 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Value of New Antimicrobials: Evaluations of Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime-Avibactam to Inform Delinked Payments by the NHS in England\",\"authors\":\"Beth Woods,&nbsp;Ben Kearns,&nbsp;Laetitia Schmitt,&nbsp;Dina Jankovic,&nbsp;Claire Rothery,&nbsp;Sue Harnan,&nbsp;Jean Hamilton,&nbsp;Alison Scope,&nbsp;Shijie Ren,&nbsp;Laura Bojke,&nbsp;Mark Wilcox,&nbsp;William Hope,&nbsp;Colm Leonard,&nbsp;Philip Howard,&nbsp;David Jenkins,&nbsp;Alan Ashworth,&nbsp;Andrew Bentley,&nbsp;Mark Sculpher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The UK has recently established subscription-payment agreements for two antimicrobials: cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam. This article summarises the novel value assessments that informed this process and lessons learned for future pricing and funding decisions.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The evaluations used decision modelling to predict population incremental net health effects (INHEs), informed by systematic reviews, evidence syntheses, national surveillance data and structured expert elicitation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant challenges faced during the development of the evaluations led to profound uncertainty in the estimates of INHEs. The value assessment required definition of the population expected to receive the new antimicrobials; estimating value within this heterogenous population; assessing comparative efficacy using antimicrobial susceptibility data due to the absence of relevant clinical data; and predicting population-level benefits despite poor data on current numbers of drug-resistant infections and uncertainties around emerging resistance. Though both antimicrobials offer the potential to treat multi-drug resistant infections, the benefits estimated were modest due to the rarity of true pan-resistance, low life expectancy of the patient population and difficulty of identifying and quantifying additional sources of value.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assessing the population INHEs of new antimicrobials was complex and resource intensive. Future evaluations should continue to assemble evidence relating to areas of expected usage, patient numbers over time and comparative effectiveness and safety. Projections of patient numbers could be greatly enhanced by the development of national level linked clinical, prescribing and laboratory data. A practical approach to synthesising these data would be to combine expert assessments of key parameters with a simple generic decision model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"5 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:联合王国最近建立了两种抗菌剂的订阅支付协议:头孢地罗和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦。本文总结了为这一过程提供信息的新型价值评估,以及为未来定价和融资决策提供的经验教训。方法:在系统评价、证据综合、国家监测数据和结构化专家启发的基础上,采用决策模型预测人口增量净健康效应(INHEs)。结果:在评估的发展过程中面临的重大挑战导致了INHEs估计的深刻不确定性。价值评估需要确定预期接受新抗微生物药物的人群;在这个异质群体内的估计值;由于缺乏相关临床数据,使用抗菌药物敏感性数据评估比较疗效;尽管关于当前耐药感染数量的数据不足,以及围绕新出现的耐药性的不确定性,但预测人口水平的益处。尽管这两种抗菌素都具有治疗多重耐药感染的潜力,但由于真正的泛耐药罕见,患者群体的预期寿命较低,以及难以确定和量化其他价值来源,估计的益处并不大。结论:对新型抗菌素的人群INHEs进行评估是一项复杂且资源密集的工作。未来的评估应继续收集与预期使用领域、长期患者数量以及相对有效性和安全性相关的证据。通过发展国家级的临床、处方和实验室数据,可以大大加强对患者人数的预测。综合这些数据的一个实际方法是将关键参数的专家评估与一个简单的通用决策模型结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Value of New Antimicrobials: Evaluations of Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime-Avibactam to Inform Delinked Payments by the NHS in England

Objectives

The UK has recently established subscription-payment agreements for two antimicrobials: cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam. This article summarises the novel value assessments that informed this process and lessons learned for future pricing and funding decisions.

Methods

The evaluations used decision modelling to predict population incremental net health effects (INHEs), informed by systematic reviews, evidence syntheses, national surveillance data and structured expert elicitation.

Results

Significant challenges faced during the development of the evaluations led to profound uncertainty in the estimates of INHEs. The value assessment required definition of the population expected to receive the new antimicrobials; estimating value within this heterogenous population; assessing comparative efficacy using antimicrobial susceptibility data due to the absence of relevant clinical data; and predicting population-level benefits despite poor data on current numbers of drug-resistant infections and uncertainties around emerging resistance. Though both antimicrobials offer the potential to treat multi-drug resistant infections, the benefits estimated were modest due to the rarity of true pan-resistance, low life expectancy of the patient population and difficulty of identifying and quantifying additional sources of value.

Conclusions

Assessing the population INHEs of new antimicrobials was complex and resource intensive. Future evaluations should continue to assemble evidence relating to areas of expected usage, patient numbers over time and comparative effectiveness and safety. Projections of patient numbers could be greatly enhanced by the development of national level linked clinical, prescribing and laboratory data. A practical approach to synthesising these data would be to combine expert assessments of key parameters with a simple generic decision model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Utility Analysis of Genomic Profiling in Directing Targeted Therapy in Advanced NSCLC in Thailand. Predicting Health Utilities Using Health Administrative Data: Leveraging Survey-linked Health Administrative Data from Ontario, Canada. Health Economic Evaluations of Obesity Interventions: Expert Views on How We Can Identify, Interpret, Analyse and Translate Effects Contextual Factors that Influence Antibiotic Prescribing: A Discrete Choice Experiment of GP Registrars Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1