Saif Al-Chalabi, Sally Alezergawi, Darren Green, Smeeta Sinha, Philip A Kalra
{"title":"总体纵向应变与糖尿病患者和接受血液透析的人的死亡率相关性较差。","authors":"Saif Al-Chalabi, Sally Alezergawi, Darren Green, Smeeta Sinha, Philip A Kalra","doi":"10.1159/000542964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Haemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease. However, the risk of mortality remains significantly higher compared to the general population, even when matched for age and sex. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from speckle tracking echocardiography, has shown promise as a predictor of mortality in HD patients. However, its prognostic utility in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and receiving HD remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of GLS in HD patients, with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was a long-term follow-up extension study of an earlier published study that investigated a cohort of HD patients from a single centre with a comprehensive cardiovascular imaging protocol. All patients had an echocardiography with the use of speckle tracking software to determine GLS. Patients were divided into group A (with DM) and group B (without DM). Patients were followed up until death, major adverse cardiovascular events, transplantation, or the censoring date (29 February 2024). Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 184 patients receiving HD were included in the analysis. Patients with DM (group A) had significantly higher all-cause mortality (ACM) (47.1% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) and a lower chance of receiving a kidney transplant (13.2% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001). In group A, GLS did not predict ACM, whereas in group B, a GLS cut-off of -15.76% correlated with higher 5-year ACM (p = 0.036). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was a significant predictor of ACM in group A (HR 0.98; p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLS is a poor predictor of adverse outcomes in HD patients with DM, likely due to their high cardiovascular risk. In contrast, GLS was a significant predictor of mortality in non-diabetic HD patients. LVEF may be a more reliable prognostic indicator in high-risk diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Longitudinal Strain Correlates Poorly with Mortality in People with Diabetes Mellitus and Receiving Haemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Saif Al-Chalabi, Sally Alezergawi, Darren Green, Smeeta Sinha, Philip A Kalra\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Haemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease. However, the risk of mortality remains significantly higher compared to the general population, even when matched for age and sex. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from speckle tracking echocardiography, has shown promise as a predictor of mortality in HD patients. However, its prognostic utility in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and receiving HD remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of GLS in HD patients, with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was a long-term follow-up extension study of an earlier published study that investigated a cohort of HD patients from a single centre with a comprehensive cardiovascular imaging protocol. All patients had an echocardiography with the use of speckle tracking software to determine GLS. Patients were divided into group A (with DM) and group B (without DM). Patients were followed up until death, major adverse cardiovascular events, transplantation, or the censoring date (29 February 2024). Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 184 patients receiving HD were included in the analysis. Patients with DM (group A) had significantly higher all-cause mortality (ACM) (47.1% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) and a lower chance of receiving a kidney transplant (13.2% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001). In group A, GLS did not predict ACM, whereas in group B, a GLS cut-off of -15.76% correlated with higher 5-year ACM (p = 0.036). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was a significant predictor of ACM in group A (HR 0.98; p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLS is a poor predictor of adverse outcomes in HD patients with DM, likely due to their high cardiovascular risk. In contrast, GLS was a significant predictor of mortality in non-diabetic HD patients. LVEF may be a more reliable prognostic indicator in high-risk diabetic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiorenal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"61-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiorenal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血液透析(HD)是终末期肾脏疾病(ESKD)患者的一种维持生命的治疗方法。然而,即使在年龄和性别相匹配的情况下,与一般人群相比,死亡风险仍然明显更高。总体纵向应变(GLS),源自斑点跟踪超声心动图,已显示出预测HD患者死亡率的希望。然而,对于有多种心血管危险因素的患者,如糖尿病(DM)和接受HD治疗的患者,其预后效用尚不清楚。该研究旨在评估GLS在患有和不患有糖尿病的HD患者中的预后价值。方法:该前瞻性研究是早期发表的一项研究的长期随访扩展研究,该研究调查了来自单一中心的血液透析患者队列,并采用了全面的心血管成像方案。所有患者均行超声心动图,并使用斑点跟踪软件确定GLS。将患者分为A组(有糖尿病)和B组(无糖尿病)。随访患者至死亡、主要心血管不良事件(MACE)、移植或审查日期(2024年2月29日)。采用单变量Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。结果:184例HD患者被纳入分析。糖尿病患者(A组)的全因死亡率(ACM)显著高于糖尿病患者(47.1% vs. 20.7%)。结论:GLS是HD合并糖尿病患者不良结局的不良预测指标,可能是由于他们的心血管风险较高。相比之下,GLS是非糖尿病性HD患者死亡率的重要预测因子。LVEF可能是高风险糖尿病患者更可靠的预后指标。
Global Longitudinal Strain Correlates Poorly with Mortality in People with Diabetes Mellitus and Receiving Haemodialysis.
Introduction: Haemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease. However, the risk of mortality remains significantly higher compared to the general population, even when matched for age and sex. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from speckle tracking echocardiography, has shown promise as a predictor of mortality in HD patients. However, its prognostic utility in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and receiving HD remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of GLS in HD patients, with and without DM.
Methods: This prospective study was a long-term follow-up extension study of an earlier published study that investigated a cohort of HD patients from a single centre with a comprehensive cardiovascular imaging protocol. All patients had an echocardiography with the use of speckle tracking software to determine GLS. Patients were divided into group A (with DM) and group B (without DM). Patients were followed up until death, major adverse cardiovascular events, transplantation, or the censoring date (29 February 2024). Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: A total of 184 patients receiving HD were included in the analysis. Patients with DM (group A) had significantly higher all-cause mortality (ACM) (47.1% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) and a lower chance of receiving a kidney transplant (13.2% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001). In group A, GLS did not predict ACM, whereas in group B, a GLS cut-off of -15.76% correlated with higher 5-year ACM (p = 0.036). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was a significant predictor of ACM in group A (HR 0.98; p = 0.036).
Conclusion: GLS is a poor predictor of adverse outcomes in HD patients with DM, likely due to their high cardiovascular risk. In contrast, GLS was a significant predictor of mortality in non-diabetic HD patients. LVEF may be a more reliable prognostic indicator in high-risk diabetic patients.
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.