Benesco™对食管敏感性、粘膜屏障功能和反流症状的影响:一项机制研究

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3
Thijs Kuipers, Renske A B Oude Nijhuis, Gwen M C Masclee, Albert J Bredenoord
{"title":"Benesco™对食管敏感性、粘膜屏障功能和反流症状的影响:一项机制研究","authors":"Thijs Kuipers, Renske A B Oude Nijhuis, Gwen M C Masclee, Albert J Bredenoord","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of GERD management however a subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies. Benesco™ is an over-the-counter supplement, of which the active ingredient is quercetin and has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of benesco™ on esophageal sensitivity, mucosal barrier function, and reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GERD were evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy, and esophageal biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 patients (3 men, median age 45 (34-64)) were included. The perfusion sensitivity score (PSS) did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (90.5 (21.4-129.7) to 62.5 (16.4-96.9) p = 0.123). Esophageal sensitivity based on the maximum reported VAS score during the esophageal acid perfusion test did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (7.4 (5.3-9.8) to 7.7 (5.3-8.7) p = 0.482). Furthermore, no effects were seen on measures of mucosal barrier function such as extracellular in vivo impedance (ETIS) (6807 (5153-8883) Ω·m vs 6702 (5106-7847) Ω·m, p = 0.575), in vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (183 (153-204) Ω.cm2 vs 201 (128-250) Ω.cm2, p = 1.000), or fluorescein flux (896 (73-1922) nmol/cm<sup>2</sup>/h vs 811 (187-2693) nmol/cm<sup>2</sup>/h, p = 0.237).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not observe an improvement of acid perception, mucosal barrier function, or reflux symptoms by benesco™ in this study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Dutch Trial Register number: NL9324.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"285-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Benesco™ on Esophageal Sensitivity, Mucosal Barrier Function, and Reflux Symptoms: A Mechanistic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thijs Kuipers, Renske A B Oude Nijhuis, Gwen M C Masclee, Albert J Bredenoord\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of GERD management however a subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies. Benesco™ is an over-the-counter supplement, of which the active ingredient is quercetin and has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of benesco™ on esophageal sensitivity, mucosal barrier function, and reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GERD were evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy, and esophageal biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 patients (3 men, median age 45 (34-64)) were included. The perfusion sensitivity score (PSS) did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (90.5 (21.4-129.7) to 62.5 (16.4-96.9) p = 0.123). Esophageal sensitivity based on the maximum reported VAS score during the esophageal acid perfusion test did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (7.4 (5.3-9.8) to 7.7 (5.3-8.7) p = 0.482). Furthermore, no effects were seen on measures of mucosal barrier function such as extracellular in vivo impedance (ETIS) (6807 (5153-8883) Ω·m vs 6702 (5106-7847) Ω·m, p = 0.575), in vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (183 (153-204) Ω.cm2 vs 201 (128-250) Ω.cm2, p = 1.000), or fluorescein flux (896 (73-1922) nmol/cm<sup>2</sup>/h vs 811 (187-2693) nmol/cm<sup>2</sup>/h, p = 0.237).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not observe an improvement of acid perception, mucosal barrier function, or reflux symptoms by benesco™ in this study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Dutch Trial Register number: NL9324.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"285-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08765-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃食管反流病(GERD)是西方世界最常见的胃肠疾病之一。质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是胃食管反流治疗的基石,然而一部分患者寻求(自然)替代疗法。Benesco™是一种非处方补充剂,其活性成分是槲皮素,对食道屏障功能有积极作用。因此,本研究的目的是评估benesco™对食管敏感性、粘膜屏障功能和反流症状的影响。方法:对胃食管反流患者进行胃酸灌注试验、上胃镜电组织阻抗谱检查和食管活检。结果:纳入8例患者(3例男性,中位年龄45岁(34-64岁))。benesco™治疗后灌注敏感性评分(PSS)无显著变化(90.5(21.4-129.7)至62.5 (16.4-96.9)p = 0.123)。经benesco™治疗后,食道酸灌注试验中基于最大报告VAS评分的食管敏感性无显著变化(7.4(5.3-9.8)至7.7 (5.3-8.7)p = 0.482)。此外,对粘膜屏障功能的测量没有影响,如细胞外体内阻抗(ETIS) (6807 (5153-8883) Ω·m vs 6702 (5106-7847) Ω·m, p = 0.575),体外经上皮电阻(TEER) (183 (153-204) Ω。Cm2 vs 201 (128-250) Ω。Cm2, p = 1.000)或荧光素通量(896 (73-1922)nmol/ Cm2 /h vs 811 (187-2693) nmol/ Cm2 /h, p = 0.237)。结论:在这项研究中,我们没有观察到benesco™对酸感知、粘膜屏障功能或反流症状的改善。试验注册:荷兰试验注册编号:NL9324。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Benesco™ on Esophageal Sensitivity, Mucosal Barrier Function, and Reflux Symptoms: A Mechanistic Study.

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of GERD management however a subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies. Benesco™ is an over-the-counter supplement, of which the active ingredient is quercetin and has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of benesco™ on esophageal sensitivity, mucosal barrier function, and reflux symptoms.

Methods: Patients with GERD were evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy, and esophageal biopsies.

Results: 8 patients (3 men, median age 45 (34-64)) were included. The perfusion sensitivity score (PSS) did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (90.5 (21.4-129.7) to 62.5 (16.4-96.9) p = 0.123). Esophageal sensitivity based on the maximum reported VAS score during the esophageal acid perfusion test did not change significantly after treatment with benesco™ (7.4 (5.3-9.8) to 7.7 (5.3-8.7) p = 0.482). Furthermore, no effects were seen on measures of mucosal barrier function such as extracellular in vivo impedance (ETIS) (6807 (5153-8883) Ω·m vs 6702 (5106-7847) Ω·m, p = 0.575), in vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (183 (153-204) Ω.cm2 vs 201 (128-250) Ω.cm2, p = 1.000), or fluorescein flux (896 (73-1922) nmol/cm2/h vs 811 (187-2693) nmol/cm2/h, p = 0.237).

Conclusion: We did not observe an improvement of acid perception, mucosal barrier function, or reflux symptoms by benesco™ in this study.

Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register number: NL9324.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Ethics Consultations in Cirrhosis Care. A Residual Laterally Spreading Tumor that Regressed After Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection of Sigmoid Cancer. Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future? Cholangioscope-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy in the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain Related to the Appendix: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1