慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入磷酸二酯酶抑制剂的必要性

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1080/17512433.2024.2438187
Mario Cazzola, Luigino Calzetta, Paola Rogliani, Maria Gabriella Matera
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入磷酸二酯酶抑制剂的必要性","authors":"Mario Cazzola, Luigino Calzetta, Paola Rogliani, Maria Gabriella Matera","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2438187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The therapeutic implications of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors have attracted interest because PDEs are regarded as an intracellular target to be exploited for therapeutic advancements in the treatment of COPD. At present, the only approved approach for the treatment of COPD with PDE inhibitors is the use of an oral PDE4 inhibitor. However, this treatment is not widely employed, primarily due to the narrow therapeutic index associated with oral PDE4 inhibitors, which significantly limits the tolerable dose. The inhalation route represents a viable alternative to the oral route for improving the therapeutic index of PDE4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The development of inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, with a focus on tanimilast and ensifentrine, the latter of which is a dual PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The inhalation route offers several advantages regarding the delivery of PDE inhibitors for the management of COPD. Tanimilast and ensifentrine have been shown to improve lung function, reduce exacerbations and enhance quality of life in COPD patients. However, it has not yet been determined which type of COPD patient might benefit more from inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, and it remains unclear whether concomitant inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 confers a significant benefit compared to blocking PDE4 alone in COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The need for inhaled phosphodiesterase inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Cazzola, Luigino Calzetta, Paola Rogliani, Maria Gabriella Matera\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2024.2438187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The therapeutic implications of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors have attracted interest because PDEs are regarded as an intracellular target to be exploited for therapeutic advancements in the treatment of COPD. At present, the only approved approach for the treatment of COPD with PDE inhibitors is the use of an oral PDE4 inhibitor. However, this treatment is not widely employed, primarily due to the narrow therapeutic index associated with oral PDE4 inhibitors, which significantly limits the tolerable dose. The inhalation route represents a viable alternative to the oral route for improving the therapeutic index of PDE4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The development of inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, with a focus on tanimilast and ensifentrine, the latter of which is a dual PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The inhalation route offers several advantages regarding the delivery of PDE inhibitors for the management of COPD. Tanimilast and ensifentrine have been shown to improve lung function, reduce exacerbations and enhance quality of life in COPD patients. However, it has not yet been determined which type of COPD patient might benefit more from inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, and it remains unclear whether concomitant inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 confers a significant benefit compared to blocking PDE4 alone in COPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2438187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2438187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磷酸二酯酶(PDE)抑制剂的治疗意义引起了人们的兴趣,因为PDE被认为是一种细胞内靶点,可以用于COPD的治疗进展。目前,唯一被批准的使用PDE抑制剂治疗COPD的方法是使用口服PDE4抑制剂。然而,这种治疗并没有被广泛应用,主要是因为口服PDE4抑制剂的治疗指数较窄,这在很大程度上限制了允许的剂量。吸入途径是改善PDE4抑制剂治疗指标的可行替代口服途径。涉及领域:吸入性PDE4抑制剂的开发,重点是tanimilast和ensifentrine,后者是双重PDE3/PDE4抑制剂。专家意见:吸入途径在给药PDE抑制剂治疗COPD方面有几个优势。他尼司特和恩西芬汀已被证明可以改善COPD患者的肺功能,减少急性加重,提高生活质量。然而,目前尚未确定哪种类型的COPD患者可能从吸入PDE4抑制剂中获益更多,并且仍然不清楚在COPD中,与单独阻断PDE4相比,PDE3和PDE4的联合抑制是否能带来显著的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The need for inhaled phosphodiesterase inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Introduction: The therapeutic implications of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors have attracted interest because PDEs are regarded as an intracellular target to be exploited for therapeutic advancements in the treatment of COPD. At present, the only approved approach for the treatment of COPD with PDE inhibitors is the use of an oral PDE4 inhibitor. However, this treatment is not widely employed, primarily due to the narrow therapeutic index associated with oral PDE4 inhibitors, which significantly limits the tolerable dose. The inhalation route represents a viable alternative to the oral route for improving the therapeutic index of PDE4 inhibitors.

Areas covered: The development of inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, with a focus on tanimilast and ensifentrine, the latter of which is a dual PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor.

Expert opinion: The inhalation route offers several advantages regarding the delivery of PDE inhibitors for the management of COPD. Tanimilast and ensifentrine have been shown to improve lung function, reduce exacerbations and enhance quality of life in COPD patients. However, it has not yet been determined which type of COPD patient might benefit more from inhaled PDE4 inhibitors, and it remains unclear whether concomitant inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 confers a significant benefit compared to blocking PDE4 alone in COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
期刊最新文献
The ketamine chameleon: history, pharmacology, and the contested value of experience. A systematic review and meta-analysis of users versus non-users: unveiling the influence of proton pump inhibitors on capecitabine efficacy in colorectal cancer. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and exposure-response analysis of anrikefon: insights and implications in clinical analgesia. Person-centeredness in medication management with people living with dementia. Analysis of serum concentrations of metoprolol and its metabolite α-hydroxymetoprolol in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a pilot study in routine health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1