参与以社区为基础的外出活动与Kihon检查表评估的身体虚弱的关系:一项队列研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1159/000542089
Masanori Morikawa, Kenji Harada, Satoshi Kurita, Chiharu Nishijima, Kazuya Fujii, Daisuke Kakita, Yukari Yamashiro, Naoto Takayanagi, Motoki Sudo, Hiroyuki Shimada
{"title":"参与以社区为基础的外出活动与Kihon检查表评估的身体虚弱的关系:一项队列研究。","authors":"Masanori Morikawa, Kenji Harada, Satoshi Kurita, Chiharu Nishijima, Kazuya Fujii, Daisuke Kakita, Yukari Yamashiro, Naoto Takayanagi, Motoki Sudo, Hiroyuki Shimada","doi":"10.1159/000542089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In efforts to address the public health concern of physical frailty prevention, community-based programs without supervision are anticipated, yet efficacy has not been shown. We aimed to investigate the association of engaging in an unsupervised, community-based going-out program on the incidence of physical frailty among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort observational study was employed. Following a baseline assessment during 2015 and 2017 in Japan, we observed 1,350 older adults engage in a community-based going-out program for 12 months. Participants were categorized into either a non-engaged or engaged group via propensity score matching. A follow-up survey (mean period = 920 ± 76 days) was conducted to investigate the occurrence of physical frailty using the Kihon Checklist. The incidence of frailty, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat for program engagement were calculated. The odds ratio (OR) in engaged group compared with the non-engaged group was determined in a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of frailty was 15.1% in non-engaged group (n = 107 out of 628) and 8.3% in the engaged group (n = 53 out of 628). The number needed to treat and its 95% confidence interval were 21 (12-63) after matching. Compared with matched non-engaged group (OR 1.0), the OR and 95% confidence interval of matched engaged group for occurrence of physical frailty were 0.61 (0.42-0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging in the unsupervised community-based going-out program could prevent one incidence of physical frailty in every 21 participants and may thus contribute to preventing physical frailty at the population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement in the Community-Based Going-Out Programs and the Association with Physical Frailty Assessed by the Kihon Checklist: A Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Masanori Morikawa, Kenji Harada, Satoshi Kurita, Chiharu Nishijima, Kazuya Fujii, Daisuke Kakita, Yukari Yamashiro, Naoto Takayanagi, Motoki Sudo, Hiroyuki Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In efforts to address the public health concern of physical frailty prevention, community-based programs without supervision are anticipated, yet efficacy has not been shown. We aimed to investigate the association of engaging in an unsupervised, community-based going-out program on the incidence of physical frailty among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort observational study was employed. Following a baseline assessment during 2015 and 2017 in Japan, we observed 1,350 older adults engage in a community-based going-out program for 12 months. Participants were categorized into either a non-engaged or engaged group via propensity score matching. A follow-up survey (mean period = 920 ± 76 days) was conducted to investigate the occurrence of physical frailty using the Kihon Checklist. The incidence of frailty, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat for program engagement were calculated. The odds ratio (OR) in engaged group compared with the non-engaged group was determined in a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of frailty was 15.1% in non-engaged group (n = 107 out of 628) and 8.3% in the engaged group (n = 53 out of 628). The number needed to treat and its 95% confidence interval were 21 (12-63) after matching. Compared with matched non-engaged group (OR 1.0), the OR and 95% confidence interval of matched engaged group for occurrence of physical frailty were 0.61 (0.42-0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging in the unsupervised community-based going-out program could prevent one incidence of physical frailty in every 21 participants and may thus contribute to preventing physical frailty at the population level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在努力解决身体虚弱预防的公共卫生问题,以社区为基础的项目,没有监督,但尚未显示效力。我们的目的是调查参与一个无监督的、以社区为基础的外出活动与老年人身体虚弱发生率的关系。方法:采用队列观察研究。根据2015年和2017年在日本进行的基线评估,我们观察了1350名老年人参加了为期12个月的社区外出计划。通过倾向得分匹配,将参与者分为非投入组和投入组。随访时间(平均920±76天),采用Kihon检查表调查身体虚弱的发生情况。计算了虚弱发生率、绝对风险降低率和参与项目所需治疗的人数。采用logistic回归模型确定敬业组与非敬业组的比值比(OR)。结果:在628例患者中,未参与组的衰弱发生率为15.1% (n = 107),参与组为8.3% (n = 53)。匹配后需要治疗的人数及其95%置信区间为21(12-63)。与匹配的非工作组比较(OR 1.0),匹配的工作组身体虚弱发生的OR和95%置信区间为0.61(0.42 ~ 0.87)。结论:参与无监督的社区外出计划可以预防每21名参与者中的1人发生身体虚弱,因此可能有助于在人群水平上预防身体虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engagement in the Community-Based Going-Out Programs and the Association with Physical Frailty Assessed by the Kihon Checklist: A Cohort Study.

Introduction: In efforts to address the public health concern of physical frailty prevention, community-based programs without supervision are anticipated, yet efficacy has not been shown. We aimed to investigate the association of engaging in an unsupervised, community-based going-out program on the incidence of physical frailty among older adults.

Methods: A cohort observational study was employed. Following a baseline assessment during 2015 and 2017 in Japan, we observed 1,350 older adults engage in a community-based going-out program for 12 months. Participants were categorized into either a non-engaged or engaged group via propensity score matching. A follow-up survey (mean period = 920 ± 76 days) was conducted to investigate the occurrence of physical frailty using the Kihon Checklist. The incidence of frailty, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat for program engagement were calculated. The odds ratio (OR) in engaged group compared with the non-engaged group was determined in a logistic regression model.

Results: Incidence of frailty was 15.1% in non-engaged group (n = 107 out of 628) and 8.3% in the engaged group (n = 53 out of 628). The number needed to treat and its 95% confidence interval were 21 (12-63) after matching. Compared with matched non-engaged group (OR 1.0), the OR and 95% confidence interval of matched engaged group for occurrence of physical frailty were 0.61 (0.42-0.87).

Conclusions: Engaging in the unsupervised community-based going-out program could prevent one incidence of physical frailty in every 21 participants and may thus contribute to preventing physical frailty at the population level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
期刊最新文献
Foot and Footwear Considerations for Older People: A Special Article Collection for Gerontology. Engagement in the Community-Based Going-Out Programs and the Association with Physical Frailty Assessed by the Kihon Checklist: A Cohort Study. Chronic Nf-κB Inhibition Prevents Experimental Aging Nephropathy. Does the digital divide accelerate cognitive function decline related to the poor management of diabetes in later life? Views of Aging and Subjective Cognition in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1