慢性肾脏疾病患者摘除设备对肾脏替代治疗和心脏植入式电子设备感染的影响。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.052
Ashraf Alzahrani, Lillie Lamont, Mohammed Mhanna, Peter Farjo, E Michael Powers, Steven Bailin, Paari Dominic
{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病患者摘除设备对肾脏替代治疗和心脏植入式电子设备感染的影响。","authors":"Ashraf Alzahrani, Lillie Lamont, Mohammed Mhanna, Peter Farjo, E Michael Powers, Steven Bailin, Paari Dominic","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) are at high risk for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Although device extraction is standard management, it is often avoided in these patients because of high procedural risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the outcomes of CIED extraction in CKD on RRT patients with device infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the TriNetX research network. The International Classification of Diseases-10<sup>th</sup> Revision-Clinical Modification coding system was used to identify patients. Adults with a history of CKD on RRT and CIED infection were included. Patients with renal transplantation and prosthetic heart valves were excluded. Patients were stratified by device extraction. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 patients were identified, of whom 30% (n = 159) underwent device extraction. After propensity score matching (PSM), 302 patients remained, with 151 in each group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant 1-year survival benefit for patients in the device extraction group (59.2%) compared with the no-extraction group (48.8%, P = .043; hazard ratio [HR], 0.696; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.489-0.991). Freedom from complications such as pericardial effusion was similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis using Cox proportional hazards, adjusted for baseline confounders, confirmed the survival benefit of extraction, with a reduced mortality risk (HR, 0.581; 95% CI, 0.382-0.883; P = .011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CKD on RRT patients with CIED infection, device extraction is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality at 1 year. However, the rate of device extraction is low in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of device extraction in patients with chronic kidney disease on renal replacement therapy and cardiac implantable electronic devicead infections.\",\"authors\":\"Ashraf Alzahrani, Lillie Lamont, Mohammed Mhanna, Peter Farjo, E Michael Powers, Steven Bailin, Paari Dominic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) are at high risk for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Although device extraction is standard management, it is often avoided in these patients because of high procedural risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the outcomes of CIED extraction in CKD on RRT patients with device infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the TriNetX research network. The International Classification of Diseases-10<sup>th</sup> Revision-Clinical Modification coding system was used to identify patients. Adults with a history of CKD on RRT and CIED infection were included. Patients with renal transplantation and prosthetic heart valves were excluded. Patients were stratified by device extraction. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 patients were identified, of whom 30% (n = 159) underwent device extraction. After propensity score matching (PSM), 302 patients remained, with 151 in each group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant 1-year survival benefit for patients in the device extraction group (59.2%) compared with the no-extraction group (48.8%, P = .043; hazard ratio [HR], 0.696; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.489-0.991). Freedom from complications such as pericardial effusion was similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis using Cox proportional hazards, adjusted for baseline confounders, confirmed the survival benefit of extraction, with a reduced mortality risk (HR, 0.581; 95% CI, 0.382-0.883; P = .011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In CKD on RRT patients with CIED infection, device extraction is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality at 1 year. However, the rate of device extraction is low in this group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者发生心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)感染的风险较高。虽然器械取出是标准的管理,但由于手术风险高,这些患者往往避免。目的:评价CKD合并器械感染患者行CIED拔除术的效果。方法:本研究利用TriNetX研究网络的数据。采用《国际疾病分类-第十版-临床修改》编码系统识别患者。包括有RRT和CIED感染的CKD病史的成年人。排除肾移植和人工心脏瓣膜患者。通过器械取出对患者进行分层。主要终点是一年时的死亡率。结果:共发现530例患者,其中30% (n=159)接受了器械拔除。根据倾向评分匹配(PSM), 302例患者保留,每组151例。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,与未拔牙组(48.8%,p=0.043, HR 0.696, 95% CI 0.489-0.991)相比,拔牙组患者的一年生存率显著提高(59.2%)。两组间无心包积液等并发症。采用Cox比例风险进行敏感性分析,校正了基线混杂因素,证实了提取的生存益处,降低了死亡风险(HR 0.581, 95% CI 0.382-0.883, p=0.011)。“结论:在CKD合并CIED感染的RRT患者中,拔出器械与一年内全因死亡率的降低有关。然而,在这一组中,设备提取率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of device extraction in patients with chronic kidney disease on renal replacement therapy and cardiac implantable electronic devicead infections.

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) are at high risk for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Although device extraction is standard management, it is often avoided in these patients because of high procedural risks.

Objectives: Evaluate the outcomes of CIED extraction in CKD on RRT patients with device infection.

Methods: This study used data from the TriNetX research network. The International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification coding system was used to identify patients. Adults with a history of CKD on RRT and CIED infection were included. Patients with renal transplantation and prosthetic heart valves were excluded. Patients were stratified by device extraction. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 year.

Results: A total of 530 patients were identified, of whom 30% (n = 159) underwent device extraction. After propensity score matching (PSM), 302 patients remained, with 151 in each group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant 1-year survival benefit for patients in the device extraction group (59.2%) compared with the no-extraction group (48.8%, P = .043; hazard ratio [HR], 0.696; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.489-0.991). Freedom from complications such as pericardial effusion was similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis using Cox proportional hazards, adjusted for baseline confounders, confirmed the survival benefit of extraction, with a reduced mortality risk (HR, 0.581; 95% CI, 0.382-0.883; P = .011).

Conclusion: In CKD on RRT patients with CIED infection, device extraction is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality at 1 year. However, the rate of device extraction is low in this group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Protective Effect of Prior Cardiac Surgery in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction. Pulsed Field Ablation in the Elderly via a Pentaspline Multielectrode Catheter: Safety, Efficacy, and Comparison with Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Devices. To the Editor-Impact of mavacamten on atrial fibrillation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Author's Reply to Impact of Mavacamten on Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Between Scylla and Charybdis - The unanswered conundrum of antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1