多层硅粘聚氨酯泡沫敷料预防高危住院患者压疮的经济评价:美国和意大利的观点。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8371
Elisabetta Mezzalira, Elisa Ambrosi, Neil Askew, Leo Nherera, Richard Searle, Francis Fatoye, Cristiana Forni
{"title":"多层硅粘聚氨酯泡沫敷料预防高危住院患者压疮的经济评价:美国和意大利的观点。","authors":"Elisabetta Mezzalira, Elisa Ambrosi, Neil Askew, Leo Nherera, Richard Searle, Francis Fatoye, Cristiana Forni","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) constitute an important source of concern for healthcare systems due to their negative consequences on patient quality of life and hospital costs. This phenomenon is increasing worldwide, driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions. This economic evaluation aimed to determine whether using a multilayer, silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum area, alongside standard prevention (SP), is cost-effective in preventing HAPUs for hospitalized patients compared to SP alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the expected costs and clinical benefits of using the polyurethane foam dressing from Italian and US payor perspectives. Model inputs were taken from published studies, and uncertainty was assessed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From both US and Italian perspectives, using a foam dressing in addition to SP was found to be cost-saving in all hospital settings. That is, it reduced the incidence of HAPUs at a lower cost overall. The estimated savings were €179 per patient and $305 per patient from Italian and US perspectives. Following sensitivity analysis, the results remained cost-saving, suggesting that our findings are robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first economic analysis investigating the cost-effectiveness of preventive dressings and standard prevention for avoiding sacral pressure ulcers for at-risk hospitalized patients. This analysis suggests that using a multilayer polyurethane foam dressing to prevent sacral HAPUs in at-risk hospitalized patients is a cost-effective strategy compared with standard prevention alone and, therefore, should be considered as a strategy for PU prevention in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Evaluation of Multilayer Silicone-Adhesive Polyurethane Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in at-risk Hospitalized Patients: US and Italian Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Elisabetta Mezzalira, Elisa Ambrosi, Neil Askew, Leo Nherera, Richard Searle, Francis Fatoye, Cristiana Forni\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.8371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) constitute an important source of concern for healthcare systems due to their negative consequences on patient quality of life and hospital costs. This phenomenon is increasing worldwide, driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions. This economic evaluation aimed to determine whether using a multilayer, silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum area, alongside standard prevention (SP), is cost-effective in preventing HAPUs for hospitalized patients compared to SP alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the expected costs and clinical benefits of using the polyurethane foam dressing from Italian and US payor perspectives. Model inputs were taken from published studies, and uncertainty was assessed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From both US and Italian perspectives, using a foam dressing in addition to SP was found to be cost-saving in all hospital settings. That is, it reduced the incidence of HAPUs at a lower cost overall. The estimated savings were €179 per patient and $305 per patient from Italian and US perspectives. Following sensitivity analysis, the results remained cost-saving, suggesting that our findings are robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first economic analysis investigating the cost-effectiveness of preventive dressings and standard prevention for avoiding sacral pressure ulcers for at-risk hospitalized patients. This analysis suggests that using a multilayer polyurethane foam dressing to prevent sacral HAPUs in at-risk hospitalized patients is a cost-effective strategy compared with standard prevention alone and, therefore, should be considered as a strategy for PU prevention in hospital settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8371\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院获得性压疮(hapu)因其对患者生活质量和医院费用的负面影响而成为医疗保健系统关注的重要来源。在人口老龄化和慢性病患病率上升的推动下,这一现象在世界范围内正在增加。这项经济评估旨在确定在骶骨区域使用多层硅胶聚氨酯泡沫敷料,与标准预防(SP)相比,在预防住院患者hapu方面是否具有成本效益。方法:我们建立了决策分析模型,从意大利和美国的付款人角度估计使用聚氨酯泡沫敷料的预期成本和临床效益。模型输入来自已发表的研究,使用单向和概率敏感性分析(PSA)评估不确定性。结果:从美国和意大利的角度来看,除SP外使用泡沫敷料被发现在所有医院环境中都节省了成本。也就是说,它以较低的总体成本降低了hapu的发生率。从意大利和美国的角度来看,预计每位患者可节省179欧元,每位患者可节省305美元。在敏感性分析之后,结果仍然是节省成本的,表明我们的发现是稳健的。结论:这是第一个经济分析,调查了预防敷料和标准预防的成本效益,以避免高危住院患者的骶骨压疮。该分析表明,与单独的标准预防相比,使用多层聚氨酯泡沫敷料预防高危住院患者的骶骨hapu是一种具有成本效益的策略,因此,应考虑在医院环境中预防PU的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Evaluation of Multilayer Silicone-Adhesive Polyurethane Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in at-risk Hospitalized Patients: US and Italian Perspective.

Background: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) constitute an important source of concern for healthcare systems due to their negative consequences on patient quality of life and hospital costs. This phenomenon is increasing worldwide, driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions. This economic evaluation aimed to determine whether using a multilayer, silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum area, alongside standard prevention (SP), is cost-effective in preventing HAPUs for hospitalized patients compared to SP alone.

Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the expected costs and clinical benefits of using the polyurethane foam dressing from Italian and US payor perspectives. Model inputs were taken from published studies, and uncertainty was assessed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

Results: From both US and Italian perspectives, using a foam dressing in addition to SP was found to be cost-saving in all hospital settings. That is, it reduced the incidence of HAPUs at a lower cost overall. The estimated savings were €179 per patient and $305 per patient from Italian and US perspectives. Following sensitivity analysis, the results remained cost-saving, suggesting that our findings are robust.

Conclusion: This is the first economic analysis investigating the cost-effectiveness of preventive dressings and standard prevention for avoiding sacral pressure ulcers for at-risk hospitalized patients. This analysis suggests that using a multilayer polyurethane foam dressing to prevent sacral HAPUs in at-risk hospitalized patients is a cost-effective strategy compared with standard prevention alone and, therefore, should be considered as a strategy for PU prevention in hospital settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact". How Does Management Matter for Hospital Performance? Evidence From the Global Hospital Management Survey in China. Impact of the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform on Provider Behavior in China: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Study. Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System. Coopetition Strategy in the Healthcare: Good or Bad?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1