《通货膨胀削减法案》最大限度地提高公平价格会伤害患者吗?

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.125251
Anne M Sydor, Esteban Rivera, Robert Popovian
{"title":"《通货膨胀削减法案》最大限度地提高公平价格会伤害患者吗?","authors":"Anne M Sydor, Esteban Rivera, Robert Popovian","doi":"10.36469/001c.125251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the U.S. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto) could impact patients financially and clinically. <b>Methods:</b> Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for apixaban and rivaroxaban managed by the 3 largest PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts International, and Optum Rx, were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. <b>Results:</b> If the 3 largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients' copay amount would increase by <math><mn>235</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 482 million for apixaban and <math><mn>105</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 206 million for rivaroxaban. Such an increase could lead to 169 000 to 228 000 patients abandoning apixaban and 71 000 to 93 000 abandoning rivaroxaban. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145 000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97 000 more deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures should be considered to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations, leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Anne M Sydor, Esteban Rivera, Robert Popovian\",\"doi\":\"10.36469/001c.125251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the U.S. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto) could impact patients financially and clinically. <b>Methods:</b> Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for apixaban and rivaroxaban managed by the 3 largest PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts International, and Optum Rx, were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. <b>Results:</b> If the 3 largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients' copay amount would increase by <math><mn>235</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 482 million for apixaban and <math><mn>105</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 206 million for rivaroxaban. Such an increase could lead to 169 000 to 228 000 patients abandoning apixaban and 71 000 to 93 000 abandoning rivaroxaban. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145 000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97 000 more deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures should be considered to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations, leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"154-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.125251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.125251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:《减少通货膨胀法案》的医疗保险药品价格谈判项目允许联邦政府就选定药品的价格上限进行谈判。这些价格上限可能会减少在美国协商药品实际支付价格的药品福利管理机构(PBMs)的收入。为了抵消由此对其利润率造成的压力,PBMs可能会反过来增加患者购买价格上限药品的自付费用。本文提出的模型评估了抗凝药物阿哌沙班(Eliquis)和利伐沙班(Xarelto)的自付费用增加对患者经济和临床的影响。方法:使用CVS Caremark、Express Scripts International和Optum Rx这3家最大的药品管理公司管理的所有2023种阿哌沙班和利伐沙班处方的共付分布来估计当前的共付成本。增加的自付费用被建模为所有阿哌沙班和利伐沙班处方转移到最高的共付等级。已知的共同支付费用和放弃治疗之间的线性关系被用来计算可能导致的放弃治疗的增加。已知的因放弃抗凝剂而导致的发病率和死亡率被用来估计由此导致的发病率和死亡率的增加。结果:如果最大的3家pbm将所有阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的处方全部转移到最高处方级第6层,将成本转移到患者身上,阿哌沙班患者的共付金额将增加2.35亿至4.82亿美元,利伐沙班患者的共付金额将增加1.05亿至2.06亿美元。这种增加可能导致16.9万至22.8万名患者放弃阿哌沙班,7.1万至9.3万名患者放弃利伐沙班。由此造成的发病率和死亡率可能包括多达14.5万例重大心血管事件和多达9.7万例死亡。结论:医疗保险价格谈判项目如果导致药品管理机构增加患者自付药品费用,可能会对患者产生负面影响。政策制定者应密切监测总体可负担性的变化,包括该计划中所有患者的自付费用。应考虑采取先发制人的措施,确保最脆弱的公民不会处于不稳定的境地,从而导致较差的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?

Background: The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the U.S. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto) could impact patients financially and clinically. Methods: Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for apixaban and rivaroxaban managed by the 3 largest PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts International, and Optum Rx, were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. Results: If the 3 largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients' copay amount would increase by 235 t o 482 million for apixaban and 105 t o 206 million for rivaroxaban. Such an increase could lead to 169 000 to 228 000 patients abandoning apixaban and 71 000 to 93 000 abandoning rivaroxaban. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145 000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97 000 more deaths. Conclusion: The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures should be considered to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations, leading to poorer health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Complications, Resource Utilization, and Cost of Care. Exploring Quality of Life in Adults Living With Late-onset Pompe Disease: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perceptions from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Cannabidiol vs Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome in the Netherlands. The Effects of Adverse Events and Associated Costs on Value-Based Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1