出血部位的动态变化:评估骨盆骨折的计算机断层和血管造影造影剂外渗。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004506
Fumi Inamasu, Shokei Matsumoto, Satomi Senoo, Masayuki Shimizu
{"title":"出血部位的动态变化:评估骨盆骨折的计算机断层和血管造影造影剂外渗。","authors":"Fumi Inamasu, Shokei Matsumoto, Satomi Senoo, Masayuki Shimizu","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast extravasation (\"blush\") on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicates active bleeding, but diagnostic angiography (AG) following CECT sometimes differs from the CECT findings in patients with pelvic fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG based on pelvic anatomical location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients (18 years or older) with pelvic fractures between 2015 and 2023 who had AG after CECT. Angiography was performed in patients with blush or hematoma on CECT, or unstable hemodynamics due to pelvic fracture. Pelvic bleeding regions were categorized separately into left and right as anterior internal iliac artery and posterior internal iliac artery based on pelvic arterial anatomy. The concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG was assessed using the k statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 patients with pelvic fractures were included. Among these, 75 (86%) had blush on CECT, and 12 (14%) had no blush on CECT. The concordance rate was 83% (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.57; k = 0.30) when assessed on an individual patient basis and 53% (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.44; k = 0.34) when evaluated by anatomical regions on a unilateral half of the pelvis. The concordance rate for the anatomical hemipelvis evaluation was significantly lower compared with the individual evaluation ( p < 0.001). Thirty-three percent of patients with unilateral blush on CECT showed new contralateral blushes during AG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The location of active bleeding often differs between CECT and AG, indicating that bleeding may change intermittently and at various sites over time. This suggests the importance of evaluating both sides of the pelvic arteries during AG rather than solely relying on CECT findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic changes in bleeding sites: Evaluating contrast extravasation on computed tomography and angiography in pelvic fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Fumi Inamasu, Shokei Matsumoto, Satomi Senoo, Masayuki Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast extravasation (\\\"blush\\\") on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicates active bleeding, but diagnostic angiography (AG) following CECT sometimes differs from the CECT findings in patients with pelvic fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG based on pelvic anatomical location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients (18 years or older) with pelvic fractures between 2015 and 2023 who had AG after CECT. Angiography was performed in patients with blush or hematoma on CECT, or unstable hemodynamics due to pelvic fracture. Pelvic bleeding regions were categorized separately into left and right as anterior internal iliac artery and posterior internal iliac artery based on pelvic arterial anatomy. The concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG was assessed using the k statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 patients with pelvic fractures were included. Among these, 75 (86%) had blush on CECT, and 12 (14%) had no blush on CECT. The concordance rate was 83% (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.57; k = 0.30) when assessed on an individual patient basis and 53% (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.44; k = 0.34) when evaluated by anatomical regions on a unilateral half of the pelvis. The concordance rate for the anatomical hemipelvis evaluation was significantly lower compared with the individual evaluation ( p < 0.001). Thirty-three percent of patients with unilateral blush on CECT showed new contralateral blushes during AG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The location of active bleeding often differs between CECT and AG, indicating that bleeding may change intermittently and at various sites over time. This suggests the importance of evaluating both sides of the pelvic arteries during AG rather than solely relying on CECT findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"48-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)上的造影剂外渗(“脸红”)表明活动性出血,但CECT后的诊断性血管造影(AG)有时与骨盆骨折患者的CECT结果不同。本研究旨在评估基于骨盆解剖位置的CECT腮红与AG的一致性。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2015年至2023年期间骨盆骨折患者(18岁及以上),这些患者在CECT后发生了AG。在CECT上出现脸红或血肿,或骨盆骨折导致血流动力学不稳定的患者进行血管造影。根据盆腔动脉解剖,将盆腔出血区分为左、右髂内前动脉和髂内后动脉。使用k统计量评估CECT上腮红与AG之间的一致性率。结果:共纳入87例骨盆骨折患者。其中,75人(86%)在CECT上脸红,12人(14%)在CECT上没有脸红。一致性率为83%(95%置信区间,0.03-0.57;K = 0.30), 53%(95%可信区间,0.24-0.44;K = 0.34),通过对骨盆单侧的解剖区域进行评估。与个体评估相比,半骨盆解剖评估的一致性率显著降低(p < 0.001)。33%的CECT单侧腮红患者在手术期间出现新的对侧腮红。结论:活动性出血的位置在CECT和AG之间经常不同,表明出血可能是间歇性的,随着时间的推移在不同部位发生变化。这表明在造影期间评估盆腔两侧动脉的重要性,而不是仅仅依靠CECT的发现。证据水平:预后和流行病学;IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic changes in bleeding sites: Evaluating contrast extravasation on computed tomography and angiography in pelvic fractures.

Background: Contrast extravasation ("blush") on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) indicates active bleeding, but diagnostic angiography (AG) following CECT sometimes differs from the CECT findings in patients with pelvic fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG based on pelvic anatomical location.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients (18 years or older) with pelvic fractures between 2015 and 2023 who had AG after CECT. Angiography was performed in patients with blush or hematoma on CECT, or unstable hemodynamics due to pelvic fracture. Pelvic bleeding regions were categorized separately into left and right as anterior internal iliac artery and posterior internal iliac artery based on pelvic arterial anatomy. The concordance rate between blush on CECT and AG was assessed using the k statistic.

Results: A total of 87 patients with pelvic fractures were included. Among these, 75 (86%) had blush on CECT, and 12 (14%) had no blush on CECT. The concordance rate was 83% (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.57; k = 0.30) when assessed on an individual patient basis and 53% (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.44; k = 0.34) when evaluated by anatomical regions on a unilateral half of the pelvis. The concordance rate for the anatomical hemipelvis evaluation was significantly lower compared with the individual evaluation ( p < 0.001). Thirty-three percent of patients with unilateral blush on CECT showed new contralateral blushes during AG.

Conclusion: The location of active bleeding often differs between CECT and AG, indicating that bleeding may change intermittently and at various sites over time. This suggests the importance of evaluating both sides of the pelvic arteries during AG rather than solely relying on CECT findings.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers. How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know. Not all call is created equally: The impact of culture and sex on burnout related to in-house call. Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1