基质辅助自体软骨细胞移植在中长期治疗膝关节病变是有效的:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/ksa.12549
Alessandra Colombini, Vincenzo Raffo, Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Giuseppe Filardo, Silvia Lopa, Matteo Moretti, Laura de Girolamo
{"title":"基质辅助自体软骨细胞移植在中长期治疗膝关节病变是有效的:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alessandra Colombini, Vincenzo Raffo, Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Giuseppe Filardo, Silvia Lopa, Matteo Moretti, Laura de Girolamo","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) in terms of functional scores using scaffolds made of hyaluronic acid (HA) or collagen (C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen articles met the eligibility criteria for the analysis. Fourteen studies focused on patients treated with MACT with HA-based scaffolds, four studies with C-based scaffolds, and one study compared both scaffold types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher percentage of patients in the HA subgroup had undergone previous cartilage repair procedures, whereas multiple lesions were more common in the C subgroup. Both HA- and C-treated patients showed significant functional improvement in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee with overall mean differences at 2 and 5 years, and for HA-treated patients at 10 years. Likewise, concerning the Tegner activity scale, both subgroups demonstrated significant improvement at 2 years, with the HA subgroup showing more sustained improvement up to 10 years. The HA subgroup also had EQ-VAS reduction at 2, 5 and 10 years. Failure rates were similar between and within groups, with a range from 0% to 42% at different follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients experienced mid-term benefits from MACT, using both HA-based and C-based scaffolds, and long-term benefits from using HA-based scaffolds. The low failure rate and the fact that most patients did not require knee replacement surgery are encouraging. Accordingly, despite their complexity and high costs, regenerative techniques like MACT are effective, as they can significantly delay or even prevent the need for total knee replacement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation is effective at mid/long-term for knee lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Colombini, Vincenzo Raffo, Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Giuseppe Filardo, Silvia Lopa, Matteo Moretti, Laura de Girolamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) in terms of functional scores using scaffolds made of hyaluronic acid (HA) or collagen (C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen articles met the eligibility criteria for the analysis. Fourteen studies focused on patients treated with MACT with HA-based scaffolds, four studies with C-based scaffolds, and one study compared both scaffold types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher percentage of patients in the HA subgroup had undergone previous cartilage repair procedures, whereas multiple lesions were more common in the C subgroup. Both HA- and C-treated patients showed significant functional improvement in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee with overall mean differences at 2 and 5 years, and for HA-treated patients at 10 years. Likewise, concerning the Tegner activity scale, both subgroups demonstrated significant improvement at 2 years, with the HA subgroup showing more sustained improvement up to 10 years. The HA subgroup also had EQ-VAS reduction at 2, 5 and 10 years. Failure rates were similar between and within groups, with a range from 0% to 42% at different follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients experienced mid-term benefits from MACT, using both HA-based and C-based scaffolds, and long-term benefits from using HA-based scaffolds. The low failure rate and the fact that most patients did not require knee replacement surgery are encouraging. Accordingly, despite their complexity and high costs, regenerative techniques like MACT are effective, as they can significantly delay or even prevent the need for total knee replacement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12549\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述采用荟萃分析评估基质辅助自体软骨细胞移植(MACT)使用透明质酸(HA)或胶原蛋白(C)支架的长期疗效。方法:19篇文章符合分析的资格标准。14项研究集中于使用ha基支架治疗MACT的患者,4项研究使用c基支架,1项研究比较了两种支架类型。结果:HA亚组中较高比例的患者曾接受过软骨修复手术,而C亚组中多发病变更为常见。根据国际膝关节文献委员会,HA和c治疗的患者在2年和5年以及HA治疗的患者在10年的总体平均差异中均显示出显著的功能改善。同样,关于Tegner活动量表,两个亚组在2年时都表现出显著的改善,HA亚组在10年时表现出更持续的改善。HA亚组在2年、5年和10年时也有EQ-VAS降低。各组之间和组内的失败率相似,在不同的随访中从0%到42%不等。结论:患者使用ha基支架和c基支架均可从MACT获得中期获益,使用ha基支架可获得长期获益。低失败率和大多数患者不需要膝关节置换手术的事实令人鼓舞。因此,尽管其复杂性和高成本,像MACT这样的再生技术是有效的,因为它们可以显著延迟甚至避免全膝关节置换术的需要。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation is effective at mid/long-term for knee lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) in terms of functional scores using scaffolds made of hyaluronic acid (HA) or collagen (C).

Methods: Nineteen articles met the eligibility criteria for the analysis. Fourteen studies focused on patients treated with MACT with HA-based scaffolds, four studies with C-based scaffolds, and one study compared both scaffold types.

Results: A higher percentage of patients in the HA subgroup had undergone previous cartilage repair procedures, whereas multiple lesions were more common in the C subgroup. Both HA- and C-treated patients showed significant functional improvement in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee with overall mean differences at 2 and 5 years, and for HA-treated patients at 10 years. Likewise, concerning the Tegner activity scale, both subgroups demonstrated significant improvement at 2 years, with the HA subgroup showing more sustained improvement up to 10 years. The HA subgroup also had EQ-VAS reduction at 2, 5 and 10 years. Failure rates were similar between and within groups, with a range from 0% to 42% at different follow-ups.

Conclusion: Patients experienced mid-term benefits from MACT, using both HA-based and C-based scaffolds, and long-term benefits from using HA-based scaffolds. The low failure rate and the fact that most patients did not require knee replacement surgery are encouraging. Accordingly, despite their complexity and high costs, regenerative techniques like MACT are effective, as they can significantly delay or even prevent the need for total knee replacement.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
418
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication. The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance. Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards. Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
期刊最新文献
Welcoming Dr. Hany Bedair as an Associate Editor for KSSTA. Combined use of cleft and truncated triangle signs helps improve the preoperative MRI diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in patients with ACL injuries. Return to competition after ACL reconstruction: Factors influencing rates and timing in Swedish football players. Improved outcomes of proximal hamstring avulsion surgery in patients both under and over 50 years, with greater gains in the younger group: A matched comparative study of the PHAS cohort. No difference in ACL revision rates between hamstring and patellar tendon autograft in patients with ACL-R and a concurrent meniscal injury irrespective of meniscal treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1