护理人员对长期PICU住院期间提供者连续性的看法:一项单中心定性研究,2021-2022。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626
Patricia Peña Jiménez, Wendy Leatherman Phipps, Elizabeth Jacob-Files, Elizabeth Lindo, Lauren C Rakes, Joan S Roberts, Jonna D Clark, Emily R Berkman, Katie R Nielsen
{"title":"护理人员对长期PICU住院期间提供者连续性的看法:一项单中心定性研究,2021-2022。","authors":"Patricia Peña Jiménez, Wendy Leatherman Phipps, Elizabeth Jacob-Files, Elizabeth Lindo, Lauren C Rakes, Joan S Roberts, Jonna D Clark, Emily R Berkman, Katie R Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve continuity of care, some PICUs assign a continuity attending (CA) physician for children with prolonged hospitalizations. Little is known about how this intervention impacts familial caregivers' experiences. The objective of this study was to provide in-depth descriptions of family perspectives about continuity of care during prolonged PICU hospitalizations for children with and without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center cohort, from October 2021 to December 2022, at an academic PICU in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Familial caregivers (n = 39) of critically ill children hospitalized in the PICU for greater than or equal to 14 days were purposively sampled, stratified by group: 18 with a PICU CA and 21 without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in the context of the continuity of care model using a realist thematic approach. Familial caregivers described six themes related to relational, informational, and management continuity: 1) familiar providers who demonstrate empathy for the child improve family members' comfort and trust (Relational); 2) providers who know and use a child's baseline health status to inform clinical decision-making alleviate family members' stress (Relational, Management); 3) information loss during care team transitions frustrates families (Informational, Management); 4) known providers enhance caregiver communication (Informational); 5) familiar providers who value a family's expertise about their child's care (Relational, Management); and 6) take responsibility for the child's long-term care plan (Management) decrease parental stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As PICU patient medical complexity and length of stay increase, familial caregivers' needs transition from understanding day-to-day management to navigating care team transitions and partnering with providers to develop long-term care plans. Targeted interventions to increase provider continuity that consider relational, informational, and management continuity are needed to optimize patient outcomes and family experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"25 12","pages":"1159-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caregiver Perspectives on Provider Continuity During Prolonged PICU Hospitalizations: A Single-Center Qualitative Study, 2021-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Peña Jiménez, Wendy Leatherman Phipps, Elizabeth Jacob-Files, Elizabeth Lindo, Lauren C Rakes, Joan S Roberts, Jonna D Clark, Emily R Berkman, Katie R Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve continuity of care, some PICUs assign a continuity attending (CA) physician for children with prolonged hospitalizations. Little is known about how this intervention impacts familial caregivers' experiences. The objective of this study was to provide in-depth descriptions of family perspectives about continuity of care during prolonged PICU hospitalizations for children with and without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center cohort, from October 2021 to December 2022, at an academic PICU in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Familial caregivers (n = 39) of critically ill children hospitalized in the PICU for greater than or equal to 14 days were purposively sampled, stratified by group: 18 with a PICU CA and 21 without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in the context of the continuity of care model using a realist thematic approach. Familial caregivers described six themes related to relational, informational, and management continuity: 1) familiar providers who demonstrate empathy for the child improve family members' comfort and trust (Relational); 2) providers who know and use a child's baseline health status to inform clinical decision-making alleviate family members' stress (Relational, Management); 3) information loss during care team transitions frustrates families (Informational, Management); 4) known providers enhance caregiver communication (Informational); 5) familiar providers who value a family's expertise about their child's care (Relational, Management); and 6) take responsibility for the child's long-term care plan (Management) decrease parental stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As PICU patient medical complexity and length of stay increase, familial caregivers' needs transition from understanding day-to-day management to navigating care team transitions and partnering with providers to develop long-term care plans. Targeted interventions to increase provider continuity that consider relational, informational, and management continuity are needed to optimize patient outcomes and family experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"1159-1167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了提高护理的连续性,一些picu为长期住院的儿童分配了一名连续性主治医师。人们对这种干预如何影响家庭照顾者的经历知之甚少。本研究的目的是深入描述有和没有PICU ca的儿童在PICU长期住院期间护理连续性的家庭观点。设计:定性半结构化访谈。环境:单中心队列,2021年10月至2022年12月,在美国的一个学术PICU。参与者:有目的地对在PICU住院大于等于14天的危重儿童的家庭照顾者(n = 39)进行抽样,按组分层:18人有PICU CA, 21人没有PICU CA。干预措施:无。测量和主要结果:半结构化访谈录音,转录,编码,并在护理模型的连续性背景下使用现实主义主题方法进行分析。家庭照护者描述了与关系、信息和管理连续性相关的六个主题:1)对儿童表现出同理心的熟悉的照护者提高了家庭成员的舒适度和信任度(关系);2)了解并使用儿童基线健康状况为临床决策提供信息的提供者减轻了家庭成员的压力(关系,管理);3)护理团队过渡过程中的信息丢失会使家庭感到沮丧(information, Management);4)已知提供者加强照顾者沟通(信息);5)熟悉的提供者,他们重视家庭在照顾孩子方面的专业知识(关系,管理);6)负责孩子的长期护理计划(管理)减轻父母的压力。结论:随着PICU患者医疗复杂性和住院时间的增加,家庭护理人员的需求从理解日常管理转变为引导护理团队过渡并与提供者合作制定长期护理计划。有针对性的干预措施,以提高提供者的连续性,考虑关系,信息和管理的连续性,需要优化患者的结果和家庭的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caregiver Perspectives on Provider Continuity During Prolonged PICU Hospitalizations: A Single-Center Qualitative Study, 2021-2022.

Objectives: To improve continuity of care, some PICUs assign a continuity attending (CA) physician for children with prolonged hospitalizations. Little is known about how this intervention impacts familial caregivers' experiences. The objective of this study was to provide in-depth descriptions of family perspectives about continuity of care during prolonged PICU hospitalizations for children with and without a PICU CA.

Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Single center cohort, from October 2021 to December 2022, at an academic PICU in the United States.

Participants: Familial caregivers (n = 39) of critically ill children hospitalized in the PICU for greater than or equal to 14 days were purposively sampled, stratified by group: 18 with a PICU CA and 21 without a PICU CA.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in the context of the continuity of care model using a realist thematic approach. Familial caregivers described six themes related to relational, informational, and management continuity: 1) familiar providers who demonstrate empathy for the child improve family members' comfort and trust (Relational); 2) providers who know and use a child's baseline health status to inform clinical decision-making alleviate family members' stress (Relational, Management); 3) information loss during care team transitions frustrates families (Informational, Management); 4) known providers enhance caregiver communication (Informational); 5) familiar providers who value a family's expertise about their child's care (Relational, Management); and 6) take responsibility for the child's long-term care plan (Management) decrease parental stress.

Conclusions: As PICU patient medical complexity and length of stay increase, familial caregivers' needs transition from understanding day-to-day management to navigating care team transitions and partnering with providers to develop long-term care plans. Targeted interventions to increase provider continuity that consider relational, informational, and management continuity are needed to optimize patient outcomes and family experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Sedation and Ventilator Weaning Bundle and Time to Extubation in Infants With Bronchiolitis: Secondary Analysis of the Sedation AND Weaning in Children (SANDWICH) Trial. Subtherapeutic Meropenem Antibiotic Exposure in Children With Septic Shock Assessed by Noncompartmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis in a Prospective Dataset. The Caring Intensively Study: Three-Year Follow-Up Findings From a Mixed Methods Study of Children's Psychological and Behavioral Responses After PICU Hospitalization. Diagnostic Stewardship of Endotracheal Aspirate Cultures in Hospitalized Children With Artificial Airways: Expert Consensus Statements From the BrighT STAR (Testing STewardship for Antibiotic Reduction) Respiratory Collaborative. Airway Occlusion Pressure and P0.1 to Estimate Inspiratory Effort and Respiratory Drive in Ventilated Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1