评价膜蛋白定量方法的有效性。

IF 4.5 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Open Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1098/rsob.240082
Jana Löptien, Sidney Vesting, Susanne Dobler, Shabnam Mohammadi
{"title":"评价膜蛋白定量方法的有效性。","authors":"Jana Löptien, Sidney Vesting, Susanne Dobler, Shabnam Mohammadi","doi":"10.1098/rsob.240082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein: Na, K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods with an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly overestimate the concentration of NKA compared with the ELISA. This is due to the samples containing a heterogeneous mix of proteins, including a significant amount of non-target proteins. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to <i>in vitro</i> assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19629,"journal":{"name":"Open Biology","volume":"14 12","pages":"240082"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins.\",\"authors\":\"Jana Löptien, Sidney Vesting, Susanne Dobler, Shabnam Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsob.240082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein: Na, K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods with an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly overestimate the concentration of NKA compared with the ELISA. This is due to the samples containing a heterogeneous mix of proteins, including a significant amount of non-target proteins. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to <i>in vitro</i> assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biology\",\"volume\":\"14 12\",\"pages\":\"240082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.240082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.240082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质定量是广泛应用于生物学的重要工具。最常见的方法包括Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA)和comasassie Bradford试验。尽管它们具有广泛的适用性,但其作用机制表明,由于蛋白质在质膜中的整合,这些方法可能不是大型跨膜蛋白的理想方法。在这里,我们通过评估这三种常见的蛋白质定量方法对候选跨膜蛋白:Na, k - atp酶(NKA)的有效性和适用性来研究这个问题。我们将这些方法与我们新开发的用于定量NKA的ELISA方法进行了比较。相对标准曲线的使用使得该ELISA可以很容易地适用于其他蛋白质和整个动物王国。结果表明,与ELISA相比,三种常规方法显著高估了NKA的浓度。这是由于样品中含有异质混合的蛋白质,包括大量的非靶蛋白。此外,通过将不同方法测定的蛋白质浓度应用于体外测定,我们发现,当根据ELISA测定的浓度制备测定反应时,结果数据的变化始终很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins.

Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein: Na, K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods with an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly overestimate the concentration of NKA compared with the ELISA. This is due to the samples containing a heterogeneous mix of proteins, including a significant amount of non-target proteins. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to in vitro assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biology
Open Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Biology is an online journal that welcomes original, high impact research in cell and developmental biology, molecular and structural biology, biochemistry, neuroscience, immunology, microbiology and genetics.
期刊最新文献
Structure of WzxE the lipid III flippase for Enterobacterial Common Antigen polysaccharide. RNA splicing: a split consensus reveals two major 5' splice site classes. A simple inland culture system provides insights into ascidian post-embryonic developmental physiology. Mitochondrial chaperonin DNAJC15 promotes vulnerability to ferroptosis of chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells. Stepwise order in protein complex assembly: approaches and emerging themes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1