耳硬化症的日间病例与住院镫骨手术的成本评估:一项随机对照试验的亚分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004378
Laura S M Derks, Digna M A Kamalski, Hans G X M Thomeer, Wilko Grolman, Robert J Stokroos, Inge Wegner
{"title":"耳硬化症的日间病例与住院镫骨手术的成本评估:一项随机对照试验的亚分析。","authors":"Laura S M Derks, Digna M A Kamalski, Hans G X M Thomeer, Wilko Grolman, Robert J Stokroos, Inge Wegner","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the difference in overall, hospital, and out-of-hospital cost difference of day-case stapes surgery, compared with inpatient stapes surgery, while maintaining equal hearing outcomes and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 112 adult patients planned for primary or revision stapes surgery for clinically suspected otosclerosis were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group. An evaluation was performed of the difference in total health care-related costs (hospital and out-of-hospital costs) from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of 1 year. Audiometric measurements included pure-tone audiometric measurements and speech audiometry measured at 2 months and 1 year postoperatively. QoL was assessed at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 cases (100 patients) were analyzed due to three dropouts. The total health care-related costs were €16,586 in the inpatient group (n = 54) and €16,904 in the day-case group (n = 55). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 0.9 days (mean costs of €854) in the inpatient group and 0.5 days (mean costs of €561) in the day-case group (both mean differences statistically significant), with a crossover rate from day-case to the inpatient group of 36% (n = 20) and a crossover rate from inpatient to the day-case group of 11% (n = 6). There were no differences in postoperative complications and objective hearing outcomes. Besides an increased number (0.2) of postoperative telephone consultations in the day-case group, there were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital costs or visits. The QoL showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A day-case approach in primary or revision stapes surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related hospital and out-of-hospital costs compared with an inpatient approach. It also does not affect the surgical outcome (objective audiometric measurements and complication rate), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital visits).Level of evidence: 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cost Evaluation of Day-Case Compared With Inpatient Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laura S M Derks, Digna M A Kamalski, Hans G X M Thomeer, Wilko Grolman, Robert J Stokroos, Inge Wegner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the difference in overall, hospital, and out-of-hospital cost difference of day-case stapes surgery, compared with inpatient stapes surgery, while maintaining equal hearing outcomes and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 112 adult patients planned for primary or revision stapes surgery for clinically suspected otosclerosis were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group. An evaluation was performed of the difference in total health care-related costs (hospital and out-of-hospital costs) from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of 1 year. Audiometric measurements included pure-tone audiometric measurements and speech audiometry measured at 2 months and 1 year postoperatively. QoL was assessed at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 cases (100 patients) were analyzed due to three dropouts. The total health care-related costs were €16,586 in the inpatient group (n = 54) and €16,904 in the day-case group (n = 55). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 0.9 days (mean costs of €854) in the inpatient group and 0.5 days (mean costs of €561) in the day-case group (both mean differences statistically significant), with a crossover rate from day-case to the inpatient group of 36% (n = 20) and a crossover rate from inpatient to the day-case group of 11% (n = 6). There were no differences in postoperative complications and objective hearing outcomes. Besides an increased number (0.2) of postoperative telephone consultations in the day-case group, there were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital costs or visits. The QoL showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A day-case approach in primary or revision stapes surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related hospital and out-of-hospital costs compared with an inpatient approach. It also does not affect the surgical outcome (objective audiometric measurements and complication rate), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital visits).Level of evidence: 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"39-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004378\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价当日镫骨手术与住院镫骨手术相比,在保持相同听力结局和生活质量(QoL)的情况下,总体、住院和院外成本差异。研究设计:一项在三级转诊中心进行的单中心、非盲、随机对照试验。方法:将112例因临床怀疑耳硬化而拟行镫骨初级或翻修手术的成年患者随机分为日间治疗组和住院治疗组。从医院和患者的角度对1年期间医疗保健相关总费用(住院和院外费用)的差异进行了评估。听力测量包括术后2个月和1年的纯音听力测量和语音听力测量。采用EQ-5D和HUI3问卷分别于术后3个月和1年评估生活质量。结果:共分析了109例(100例)因3次中途退出引起的并发症。住院病人组(n = 54)的医疗相关费用总额为16,586欧元,日间病人组(n = 55)的医疗相关费用总额为16,904欧元。住院组术后平均住院时间为0.9天(平均费用为854欧元),日间病例组术后平均住院时间为0.5天(平均费用为561欧元)(均有统计学差异),日间病例组与住院组的交叉率为36% (n = 20),住院患者与日间病例组的交叉率为11% (n = 6)。术后并发症和客观听力结果无差异。除了日间病例组术后电话咨询次数增加(0.2次)外,术后住院和院外费用或就诊没有统计学上的显著差异。生活质量差异无统计学意义。结论:与住院方法相比,初级或翻修镫骨手术的一日病例方法在统计上并没有显著降低与医疗保健相关的住院和院外费用。它也不影响手术结果(客观听力学测量和并发症发生率)、生活质量和术后病程(术后住院和院外就诊次数)。证据等级:1;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cost Evaluation of Day-Case Compared With Inpatient Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the difference in overall, hospital, and out-of-hospital cost difference of day-case stapes surgery, compared with inpatient stapes surgery, while maintaining equal hearing outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

Study design: A single-center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center.

Methods: A total of 112 adult patients planned for primary or revision stapes surgery for clinically suspected otosclerosis were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group. An evaluation was performed of the difference in total health care-related costs (hospital and out-of-hospital costs) from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of 1 year. Audiometric measurements included pure-tone audiometric measurements and speech audiometry measured at 2 months and 1 year postoperatively. QoL was assessed at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires.

Results: A total of 109 cases (100 patients) were analyzed due to three dropouts. The total health care-related costs were €16,586 in the inpatient group (n = 54) and €16,904 in the day-case group (n = 55). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 0.9 days (mean costs of €854) in the inpatient group and 0.5 days (mean costs of €561) in the day-case group (both mean differences statistically significant), with a crossover rate from day-case to the inpatient group of 36% (n = 20) and a crossover rate from inpatient to the day-case group of 11% (n = 6). There were no differences in postoperative complications and objective hearing outcomes. Besides an increased number (0.2) of postoperative telephone consultations in the day-case group, there were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital costs or visits. The QoL showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: A day-case approach in primary or revision stapes surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related hospital and out-of-hospital costs compared with an inpatient approach. It also does not affect the surgical outcome (objective audiometric measurements and complication rate), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out-of-hospital visits).Level of evidence: 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes. Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Hearing Loss. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes Using Electrical Field Imaging (EFI). Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: 3-Year Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1