大麻使用、烟草使用与突发焦虑、情绪和精神障碍的关联:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724002587
Chloe Burke, Tom P Freeman, Hannah Sallis, Robyn E Wootton, Annabel Burnley, Jonas Lange, Rachel Lees, Katherine Sawyer, Gemma M J Taylor
{"title":"大麻使用、烟草使用与突发焦虑、情绪和精神障碍的关联:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chloe Burke, Tom P Freeman, Hannah Sallis, Robyn E Wootton, Annabel Burnley, Jonas Lange, Rachel Lees, Katherine Sawyer, Gemma M J Taylor","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies consistently report associations between tobacco use, cannabis use and mental illness. However, the extent to which this association reflects an increased risk of new-onset mental illness is unclear and may be biased by unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42021243903). Electronic databases were searched until November 2022. Longitudinal studies in general population samples assessing tobacco and/or cannabis use and reporting the association (e.g. risk ratio [RR]) with incident anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders were included. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Bias was explored using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, confounder matrix, <i>E</i>-values, and Doi plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five studies were included. Tobacco use was associated with mood disorders (<i>K</i> = 43; RR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.47), but not anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68) and evidence for psychotic disorders was influenced by treatment of outliers (<i>K</i> = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53; <i>K</i> = 5, RR: 2.06, 95% CI 0.98-4.29). Cannabis use was associated with psychotic disorders (<i>K</i> = 4; RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90), but not mood (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86) or anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.22). Confounder matrices and <i>E</i>-values suggested potential overestimation of effects. Only 27% of studies were rated as high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both substances were associated with psychotic disorders and tobacco use was associated with mood disorders. There was no clear evidence of an association between cannabis use and mood or anxiety disorders. Limited high-quality studies underscore the need for future research using robust causal inference approaches (e.g. evidence triangulation).</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use, and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Burke, Tom P Freeman, Hannah Sallis, Robyn E Wootton, Annabel Burnley, Jonas Lange, Rachel Lees, Katherine Sawyer, Gemma M J Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291724002587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies consistently report associations between tobacco use, cannabis use and mental illness. However, the extent to which this association reflects an increased risk of new-onset mental illness is unclear and may be biased by unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42021243903). Electronic databases were searched until November 2022. Longitudinal studies in general population samples assessing tobacco and/or cannabis use and reporting the association (e.g. risk ratio [RR]) with incident anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders were included. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Bias was explored using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, confounder matrix, <i>E</i>-values, and Doi plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five studies were included. Tobacco use was associated with mood disorders (<i>K</i> = 43; RR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.47), but not anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68) and evidence for psychotic disorders was influenced by treatment of outliers (<i>K</i> = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53; <i>K</i> = 5, RR: 2.06, 95% CI 0.98-4.29). Cannabis use was associated with psychotic disorders (<i>K</i> = 4; RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90), but not mood (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86) or anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.22). Confounder matrices and <i>E</i>-values suggested potential overestimation of effects. Only 27% of studies were rated as high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both substances were associated with psychotic disorders and tobacco use was associated with mood disorders. There was no clear evidence of an association between cannabis use and mood or anxiety disorders. Limited high-quality studies underscore the need for future research using robust causal inference approaches (e.g. evidence triangulation).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察性研究一致报告了烟草使用、大麻使用与精神疾病之间的关联。然而,这种关联在多大程度上反映了新发精神疾病风险的增加尚不清楚,并且可能受到未测量的混杂因素的影响。方法:系统评价和荟萃分析(CRD42021243903)。到2022年11月为止,一直在搜索电子数据库。纳入了对一般人群样本进行的纵向研究,评估烟草和/或大麻的使用情况,并报告其与突发焦虑、情绪或精神障碍的关联(如风险比[RR])。使用随机效应荟萃分析对估计值进行合并。使用改进的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表、混杂矩阵、e值和Doi图探讨偏差。结果:纳入75项研究。吸烟与情绪障碍相关(K = 43;RR: 1.39, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.30-1.47),但没有焦虑障碍(K = 7;相对危险度:1.21,95% CI 0.87-1.68),精神障碍的证据受到异常值治疗的影响(K = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53;K = 5, rr: 2.06, 95% ci 0.98-4.29)。大麻使用与精神障碍相关(K = 4;RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90),但与情绪无关(K = 7;RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86)或焦虑症(K = 7;Rr: 1.10, 95% ci 0.99-1.22)。混杂矩阵和e值表明可能高估了效果。只有27%的研究被评为高质量。结论:这两种物质与精神障碍有关,吸烟与情绪障碍有关。没有明确的证据表明大麻使用与情绪或焦虑障碍之间存在关联。有限的高质量研究强调了使用可靠的因果推理方法(例如证据三角测量)进行未来研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use, and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Observational studies consistently report associations between tobacco use, cannabis use and mental illness. However, the extent to which this association reflects an increased risk of new-onset mental illness is unclear and may be biased by unmeasured confounding.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42021243903). Electronic databases were searched until November 2022. Longitudinal studies in general population samples assessing tobacco and/or cannabis use and reporting the association (e.g. risk ratio [RR]) with incident anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders were included. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Bias was explored using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, confounder matrix, E-values, and Doi plots.

Results: Seventy-five studies were included. Tobacco use was associated with mood disorders (K = 43; RR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.47), but not anxiety disorders (K = 7; RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68) and evidence for psychotic disorders was influenced by treatment of outliers (K = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53; K = 5, RR: 2.06, 95% CI 0.98-4.29). Cannabis use was associated with psychotic disorders (K = 4; RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90), but not mood (K = 7; RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86) or anxiety disorders (K = 7; RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.22). Confounder matrices and E-values suggested potential overestimation of effects. Only 27% of studies were rated as high quality.

Conclusions: Both substances were associated with psychotic disorders and tobacco use was associated with mood disorders. There was no clear evidence of an association between cannabis use and mood or anxiety disorders. Limited high-quality studies underscore the need for future research using robust causal inference approaches (e.g. evidence triangulation).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Discussion on the suicide risk of CCB drugs: based on real-world drug safety surveillance. Trauma exposure, contextual stressors, and PTSD symptoms: patterns in racially and ethnically diverse, low-income postpartum women. Overlapping and differential neuropharmacological mechanisms of stimulants and nonstimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparative neuroimaging analysis. Early adversity and inflammation at midlife: the moderating role of internalizing psychopathology. Prefrontally mediated inhibition of memory systems in dissociative amnesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1