疫苗不平等的心理前因:提高疫苗接种率的关键。

Mohamed F Hussein, Sarah A Ibrahim, Suzan Abdel-Rahman, Abdelhamid Elshabrawy, Haqema A A Nasr, Saja Yazbek, Abdul Jabbar, Cinaria T Albadri, Mariam Alsanafi, Narjiss Aji, Naglaa Youssef, Hammad M Hammad, Fatimah S A Abdullah, Ehab Elrewany, Mohamed M Tahoun, Mahmoud Tolba, Mohamed K Abo Salama, Ramy M Ghazy
{"title":"疫苗不平等的心理前因:提高疫苗接种率的关键。","authors":"Mohamed F Hussein, Sarah A Ibrahim, Suzan Abdel-Rahman, Abdelhamid Elshabrawy, Haqema A A Nasr, Saja Yazbek, Abdul Jabbar, Cinaria T Albadri, Mariam Alsanafi, Narjiss Aji, Naglaa Youssef, Hammad M Hammad, Fatimah S A Abdullah, Ehab Elrewany, Mohamed M Tahoun, Mahmoud Tolba, Mohamed K Abo Salama, Ramy M Ghazy","doi":"10.1186/s42506-024-00175-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses the importance of worldwide vaccine coverage of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) vaccination. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence on the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and inequity in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study investigated the determinants of psychological antecedents and other factors behind COVID-19 vaccination and their role in vaccine coverage in MENA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted in 11 MENA countries (Egypt, Sudan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Libya, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). The minimum required sample size from each country was 307, which was increased to 330 to accommodate a non-response rate of 7%. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to capture the clustering of observations in each country and estimate the explanatory variables' effects on each item of the 5C components of the psychological antecedents scale namely (confidence, constraints, complacency, calculation, and collective responsibility).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of respondents was 3630, 40.5% of them were between the ages of 18 and 25 years, 61.1% were females, 54.0% completed university education, 55.8% were unmarried, 19.5% had chronic diseases, 43.7% reported a previous COVID-19 and 42.4% had relatives who died from COVID-19. Much of the variation in the log of the odds in each item of the 5Cs was due to heterogeneity between different countries (intraclass correlation > 0.05). Therefore, this variability confirms the various effects of psychological antecedents on vaccination coverage, stimulating vaccination inequity among them. Increasing confidence in vaccines and collective responsibility towards relatives and the community is related to increasing acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reduction in complacency, calculations, and constraints was found to be associated with acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is novel in shedding light on the importance of psychological determinants as hidden causes of vaccine inequities by using a multilevel logistic regression model for COVID-19 vaccination intention. The findings suggest that targeted interventions addressing socio-demographic factors, psychological antecedents, and accessibility barriers are essential to mitigate vaccine inequity and improve vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"99 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed F Hussein, Sarah A Ibrahim, Suzan Abdel-Rahman, Abdelhamid Elshabrawy, Haqema A A Nasr, Saja Yazbek, Abdul Jabbar, Cinaria T Albadri, Mariam Alsanafi, Narjiss Aji, Naglaa Youssef, Hammad M Hammad, Fatimah S A Abdullah, Ehab Elrewany, Mohamed M Tahoun, Mahmoud Tolba, Mohamed K Abo Salama, Ramy M Ghazy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42506-024-00175-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses the importance of worldwide vaccine coverage of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) vaccination. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence on the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and inequity in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study investigated the determinants of psychological antecedents and other factors behind COVID-19 vaccination and their role in vaccine coverage in MENA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted in 11 MENA countries (Egypt, Sudan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Libya, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). The minimum required sample size from each country was 307, which was increased to 330 to accommodate a non-response rate of 7%. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to capture the clustering of observations in each country and estimate the explanatory variables' effects on each item of the 5C components of the psychological antecedents scale namely (confidence, constraints, complacency, calculation, and collective responsibility).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of respondents was 3630, 40.5% of them were between the ages of 18 and 25 years, 61.1% were females, 54.0% completed university education, 55.8% were unmarried, 19.5% had chronic diseases, 43.7% reported a previous COVID-19 and 42.4% had relatives who died from COVID-19. Much of the variation in the log of the odds in each item of the 5Cs was due to heterogeneity between different countries (intraclass correlation > 0.05). Therefore, this variability confirms the various effects of psychological antecedents on vaccination coverage, stimulating vaccination inequity among them. Increasing confidence in vaccines and collective responsibility towards relatives and the community is related to increasing acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reduction in complacency, calculations, and constraints was found to be associated with acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is novel in shedding light on the importance of psychological determinants as hidden causes of vaccine inequities by using a multilevel logistic regression model for COVID-19 vaccination intention. The findings suggest that targeted interventions addressing socio-demographic factors, psychological antecedents, and accessibility barriers are essential to mitigate vaccine inequity and improve vaccination rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-024-00175-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-024-00175-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)强调全球冠状病毒19 (COVID-19)疫苗接种覆盖率的重要性。本研究为中东和北非地区影响COVID-19疫苗犹豫和不公平的因素提供了经验证据,填补了文献中的一个关键空白。本研究调查了中东和北非地区COVID-19疫苗接种背后的心理前因和其他因素的决定因素及其在疫苗覆盖率中的作用。方法:在11个中东和北非国家(埃及、苏丹、科威特、沙特阿拉伯、摩洛哥、伊拉克、也门、黎巴嫩、利比亚、阿富汗和巴基斯坦)进行匿名在线横断面调查。每个国家所需的最小样本量为307份,为适应7%的无反应率,样本量增加到330份。我们使用了一个多水平逻辑回归模型来捕捉每个国家的观察结果聚类,并估计解释变量对心理前因量表5C个分量项的影响,即(信心、约束、自满、计算和集体责任)。结果:调查对象3630人,年龄在18 ~ 25岁之间的占40.5%,女性占61.1%,大学学历占54.0%,未婚占55.8%,慢性病患者占19.5%,43.7%曾感染新冠肺炎,42.4%有亲属死于新冠肺炎。5个c项中每项的概率对数的大部分变化是由于不同国家之间的异质性(类内相关性0.05)。因此,这种可变性证实了心理因素对疫苗接种覆盖率的各种影响,刺激了它们之间的疫苗接种不平等。增强对疫苗的信心和对亲属和社区的集体责任与提高COVID-19疫苗的接受度有关。研究发现,自满情绪、计算和限制因素的减少与COVID-19疫苗的接受程度有关。结论:本研究通过使用COVID-19疫苗接种意向的多水平逻辑回归模型,揭示了心理决定因素作为疫苗不公平隐藏原因的重要性,这是一项新颖的研究。研究结果表明,针对社会人口因素、心理因素和可及性障碍的有针对性的干预措施对于减轻疫苗不平等和提高疫苗接种率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses the importance of worldwide vaccine coverage of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) vaccination. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence on the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and inequity in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study investigated the determinants of psychological antecedents and other factors behind COVID-19 vaccination and their role in vaccine coverage in MENA.

Methods: An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted in 11 MENA countries (Egypt, Sudan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Libya, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). The minimum required sample size from each country was 307, which was increased to 330 to accommodate a non-response rate of 7%. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to capture the clustering of observations in each country and estimate the explanatory variables' effects on each item of the 5C components of the psychological antecedents scale namely (confidence, constraints, complacency, calculation, and collective responsibility).

Results: The total number of respondents was 3630, 40.5% of them were between the ages of 18 and 25 years, 61.1% were females, 54.0% completed university education, 55.8% were unmarried, 19.5% had chronic diseases, 43.7% reported a previous COVID-19 and 42.4% had relatives who died from COVID-19. Much of the variation in the log of the odds in each item of the 5Cs was due to heterogeneity between different countries (intraclass correlation > 0.05). Therefore, this variability confirms the various effects of psychological antecedents on vaccination coverage, stimulating vaccination inequity among them. Increasing confidence in vaccines and collective responsibility towards relatives and the community is related to increasing acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reduction in complacency, calculations, and constraints was found to be associated with acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Conclusions: This study is novel in shedding light on the importance of psychological determinants as hidden causes of vaccine inequities by using a multilevel logistic regression model for COVID-19 vaccination intention. The findings suggest that targeted interventions addressing socio-demographic factors, psychological antecedents, and accessibility barriers are essential to mitigate vaccine inequity and improve vaccination rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of sleep apnea among children and its impact on academic performance. Antimicrobial use in animal farms in Egypt: rates, patterns, and determinants. Metabolic syndrome prediction based on body composition indices. Pattern of antibiotic use among children caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Correction: Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1