[膝动脉栓塞治疗继发性膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析]。

Y Q Li, G G Wang, Y J Wang, T Tao, Z Y Zhang, D Zheng, Y Chen, Z Z Jia, J W Zhao
{"title":"[膝动脉栓塞治疗继发性膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析]。","authors":"Y Q Li, G G Wang, Y J Wang, T Tao, Z Y Zhang, D Zheng, Y Chen, Z Z Jia, J W Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). <b>Methods:</b> Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect literatures related to KOA, GAE and therapeutic effects. The search period was from the inception of the databases to July 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. Data extracted included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, and the incidence of adverse events, followed by a meta-analysis using STATA 15.1 software. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 papers involving 332 patients (419 knees) from 11 studies were included according to the Na-row criteria. The technical success rate was 100%. The standardized mean differences of VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were -2.42(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.89--1.95), -2.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.94--1.93), -2.57(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.13--2.01), and -2.60(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.37--1.84), respectively, all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001); the weighted mean difference of WOMAC total score at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were -24.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-29.13--19.75), -28.30(95%<i>CI</i>:-31.47--25.12), -30.66(95%<i>CI</i>:-32.94--28.37), and -34.23(95%<i>CI</i>:-44.39--24.07), all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001). The incidence of adverse events mainly included skin color changes of 16.4%(95%<i>CI</i>: 5.5%-31.0%, <i>P</i><0.001) and hematoma at the puncture site 3.8%(95%<i>CI</i>: 1.1%-7.6%, <i>P</i><0.001), with the majority being mild and self-resolving. <b>Conclusions:</b> GAE treatment for KOA secondary pain has good efficacy and safety, providing a new treatment option for KOA patients as a minimally invasive procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 45","pages":"4162-4170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization for the treatment of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis].\",\"authors\":\"Y Q Li, G G Wang, Y J Wang, T Tao, Z Y Zhang, D Zheng, Y Chen, Z Z Jia, J W Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). <b>Methods:</b> Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect literatures related to KOA, GAE and therapeutic effects. The search period was from the inception of the databases to July 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. Data extracted included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, and the incidence of adverse events, followed by a meta-analysis using STATA 15.1 software. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 papers involving 332 patients (419 knees) from 11 studies were included according to the Na-row criteria. The technical success rate was 100%. The standardized mean differences of VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were -2.42(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.89--1.95), -2.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.94--1.93), -2.57(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.13--2.01), and -2.60(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.37--1.84), respectively, all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001); the weighted mean difference of WOMAC total score at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were -24.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-29.13--19.75), -28.30(95%<i>CI</i>:-31.47--25.12), -30.66(95%<i>CI</i>:-32.94--28.37), and -34.23(95%<i>CI</i>:-44.39--24.07), all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001). The incidence of adverse events mainly included skin color changes of 16.4%(95%<i>CI</i>: 5.5%-31.0%, <i>P</i><0.001) and hematoma at the puncture site 3.8%(95%<i>CI</i>: 1.1%-7.6%, <i>P</i><0.001), with the majority being mild and self-resolving. <b>Conclusions:</b> GAE treatment for KOA secondary pain has good efficacy and safety, providing a new treatment option for KOA patients as a minimally invasive procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"104 45\",\"pages\":\"4162-4170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价膝动脉栓塞(GAE)治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)继发疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、万方等数据库进行文献检索,收集KOA、GAE及疗效相关文献。搜索期从数据库建立到2024年7月。由两名研究者按照纳入和排除标准独立进行文献筛选和资料提取,采用非随机研究方法学指标评价纳入文献的质量。提取的数据包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、安大略省西部大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎总指数(WOMAC)评分和不良事件发生率,随后使用STATA 15.1软件进行meta分析。结果:根据Na-row标准,共纳入11项研究的11篇论文,涉及332例患者(419个膝关节)。技术成功率100%。脉管分数的标准化意味着差异1、3、6和12个月术后分别为-2.42(95%可信区间:-2.89 - 1.95),-2.44(95%可信区间:-2.94 - 1.93),-2.57(95%可信区间:-3.13 - 2.01),和-2.60(95%可信区间:-3.37 - 1.84),分别显示所有减少(所有PCI: -29.13 - 19.75), -28.30(95%可信区间:-31.47 - 25.12),-30.66(95%可信区间:-32.94 - 28.37),和-34.23(95%可信区间:-44.39 - 24.07),所有显示减少(所有PCI: 5.5% - -31.0%, PCI: 1.1% - -7.6%, PConclusions:GAE治疗KOA继发性疼痛具有良好的疗效和安全性,作为微创手术为KOA患者提供了新的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization for the treatment of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis].

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect literatures related to KOA, GAE and therapeutic effects. The search period was from the inception of the databases to July 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. Data extracted included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, and the incidence of adverse events, followed by a meta-analysis using STATA 15.1 software. Results: A total of 11 papers involving 332 patients (419 knees) from 11 studies were included according to the Na-row criteria. The technical success rate was 100%. The standardized mean differences of VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were -2.42(95%CI:-2.89--1.95), -2.44(95%CI:-2.94--1.93), -2.57(95%CI:-3.13--2.01), and -2.60(95%CI:-3.37--1.84), respectively, all showing decreases (all P<0.001); the weighted mean difference of WOMAC total score at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were -24.44(95%CI:-29.13--19.75), -28.30(95%CI:-31.47--25.12), -30.66(95%CI:-32.94--28.37), and -34.23(95%CI:-44.39--24.07), all showing decreases (all P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events mainly included skin color changes of 16.4%(95%CI: 5.5%-31.0%, P<0.001) and hematoma at the puncture site 3.8%(95%CI: 1.1%-7.6%, P<0.001), with the majority being mild and self-resolving. Conclusions: GAE treatment for KOA secondary pain has good efficacy and safety, providing a new treatment option for KOA patients as a minimally invasive procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[Clinical outcomes of endoscopic stapedotomy under continuous irrigating mode for otosclerosis]. [Application value of surface respiratory muscle electromyography and its ratio to tidal volume in the assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness in bronchial asthma patients]. [Call for the standardized application of ascites/peritoneal flushing fluid cytology in the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer]. [Clinical effect and influencing factors of endoscopic type I tympanoplasty]. [Comparison between transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with"chopstick technique"and conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1