{"title":"RHOF高表达是原发性纵隔大b细胞淋巴瘤的有效诊断标志和潜在预后指标。","authors":"Xinyi Zhu, Lin Nong, Xuemin Xue, Xiaoli Feng","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03993-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the overlap of histological and molecular features of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) with other lymphomas and its low incidence, the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of PMBL pose certain challenges. This study included 51 PMBL and 375 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS) from the GEO database and 65 PMBL and 117 DLBCL-NOS from a single center. At the transcriptional and protein levels, RHOF expression in PMBL was significantly higher than in DLBCL-NOS (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis suggested that high RHOF expression had a high discriminative diagnostic ability for PMBL and DLBCL-NOS (transcriptional level, AUC = 0.913-0.940; protein level, AUC = 0.878). Comparing RHOF with commonly used PMBL diagnostic markers CD23, CD30, and PD-L1, it was found that high RHOF expression is a more useful diagnostic marker for PMBL (AUC (RHOF) = 0.878 > AUC (CD23) = 0.818 > AUC (CD30) = 0.756 > AUC (PD-L1) = 0.590). The diagnostic model based on CD23, CD30, and RHOF exhibits higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of PMBL than any of the individual markers mentioned above. Concerning prognosis, high RHOF transcriptional expression was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in PMBL (P = 0.00037), while high RHOF protein expression was significantly associated with poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in PMBL (P = 0.034; P = 0.034). This study indicates that high RHOF expression in PMBL is closely associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical pathological features of the disease. High RHOF expression demonstrates a superior diagnostic ability in distinguishing PMBL from DLBCL-NOS compared to existing markers. Furthermore, research on RHOF expression in PMBL holds promise for providing new targets and insights for prognosis assessment and treatment of PMBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High expression of RHOF is an effective diagnostic marker and a potential prognostic indicator for primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Zhu, Lin Nong, Xuemin Xue, Xiaoli Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03993-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to the overlap of histological and molecular features of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) with other lymphomas and its low incidence, the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of PMBL pose certain challenges. This study included 51 PMBL and 375 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS) from the GEO database and 65 PMBL and 117 DLBCL-NOS from a single center. At the transcriptional and protein levels, RHOF expression in PMBL was significantly higher than in DLBCL-NOS (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis suggested that high RHOF expression had a high discriminative diagnostic ability for PMBL and DLBCL-NOS (transcriptional level, AUC = 0.913-0.940; protein level, AUC = 0.878). Comparing RHOF with commonly used PMBL diagnostic markers CD23, CD30, and PD-L1, it was found that high RHOF expression is a more useful diagnostic marker for PMBL (AUC (RHOF) = 0.878 > AUC (CD23) = 0.818 > AUC (CD30) = 0.756 > AUC (PD-L1) = 0.590). The diagnostic model based on CD23, CD30, and RHOF exhibits higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of PMBL than any of the individual markers mentioned above. Concerning prognosis, high RHOF transcriptional expression was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in PMBL (P = 0.00037), while high RHOF protein expression was significantly associated with poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in PMBL (P = 0.034; P = 0.034). This study indicates that high RHOF expression in PMBL is closely associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical pathological features of the disease. High RHOF expression demonstrates a superior diagnostic ability in distinguishing PMBL from DLBCL-NOS compared to existing markers. Furthermore, research on RHOF expression in PMBL holds promise for providing new targets and insights for prognosis assessment and treatment of PMBL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03993-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03993-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High expression of RHOF is an effective diagnostic marker and a potential prognostic indicator for primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.
Due to the overlap of histological and molecular features of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) with other lymphomas and its low incidence, the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of PMBL pose certain challenges. This study included 51 PMBL and 375 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS) from the GEO database and 65 PMBL and 117 DLBCL-NOS from a single center. At the transcriptional and protein levels, RHOF expression in PMBL was significantly higher than in DLBCL-NOS (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis suggested that high RHOF expression had a high discriminative diagnostic ability for PMBL and DLBCL-NOS (transcriptional level, AUC = 0.913-0.940; protein level, AUC = 0.878). Comparing RHOF with commonly used PMBL diagnostic markers CD23, CD30, and PD-L1, it was found that high RHOF expression is a more useful diagnostic marker for PMBL (AUC (RHOF) = 0.878 > AUC (CD23) = 0.818 > AUC (CD30) = 0.756 > AUC (PD-L1) = 0.590). The diagnostic model based on CD23, CD30, and RHOF exhibits higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of PMBL than any of the individual markers mentioned above. Concerning prognosis, high RHOF transcriptional expression was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in PMBL (P = 0.00037), while high RHOF protein expression was significantly associated with poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in PMBL (P = 0.034; P = 0.034). This study indicates that high RHOF expression in PMBL is closely associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical pathological features of the disease. High RHOF expression demonstrates a superior diagnostic ability in distinguishing PMBL from DLBCL-NOS compared to existing markers. Furthermore, research on RHOF expression in PMBL holds promise for providing new targets and insights for prognosis assessment and treatment of PMBL.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.