探索前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的检测率和筛选差异在我们所有的数据集。

Jonathan T Ryan, William Jin, Joao G Porto, Dinno Mendiola, Tarek Ajami, Hui Yu, Brandon A Mahal, Sanoj Punnen
{"title":"探索前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的检测率和筛选差异在我们所有的数据集。","authors":"Jonathan T Ryan, William Jin, Joao G Porto, Dinno Mendiola, Tarek Ajami, Hui Yu, Brandon A Mahal, Sanoj Punnen","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine prostate cancer (PCa) screening disparities among ethnic groups in the U.S. using the All of Us database.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian males ≥ 40 years old were included, excluding diagnosis's that conflict with PCa screening. We analyzed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates by age based on American Urological Association guidelines, using multivariable logistic regression (MLR) and a Cox time-to-event models that considered race, age, income, education, insurance, and home ownership as independent variables. Initial screening ages and biopsy rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 56,473 individuals, 18,088 had PSA measurements: 74% White, 15% Black, 9% Hispanic, and 2% Asian. Hispanic (20%) and Black (21%) minorities were less likely to undergo PSA screening compared to White men (39%, P < 0.001). However, minorities had their initial PSA earlier with their first test from 53-54 years old compared to White men at 58 years (P < 0.001). MLR revealed race, age, income, education, insurance type, and home ownership as screening predictors (P < 0.001). Screened Black men had higher odds of an elevated PSA (P < 0.001), but the likelihood of receiving a biopsy postelevated PSA did not significantly differ from White men (P = 0.821). Additionally, those screened at age ≥ 70 were more likely to be White, have at least a college education, and be homeowners (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>White men, despite starting at a later age, are screened with PSAs more frequently than minorities, and often undergo screening at older ages outside the recommended guidelines. Black men did not have a higher rate of biopsy after having an elevated PSA compared to White men.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Testing rates and screening disparities in the all of us dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan T Ryan, William Jin, Joao G Porto, Dinno Mendiola, Tarek Ajami, Hui Yu, Brandon A Mahal, Sanoj Punnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine prostate cancer (PCa) screening disparities among ethnic groups in the U.S. using the All of Us database.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian males ≥ 40 years old were included, excluding diagnosis's that conflict with PCa screening. We analyzed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates by age based on American Urological Association guidelines, using multivariable logistic regression (MLR) and a Cox time-to-event models that considered race, age, income, education, insurance, and home ownership as independent variables. Initial screening ages and biopsy rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 56,473 individuals, 18,088 had PSA measurements: 74% White, 15% Black, 9% Hispanic, and 2% Asian. Hispanic (20%) and Black (21%) minorities were less likely to undergo PSA screening compared to White men (39%, P < 0.001). However, minorities had their initial PSA earlier with their first test from 53-54 years old compared to White men at 58 years (P < 0.001). MLR revealed race, age, income, education, insurance type, and home ownership as screening predictors (P < 0.001). Screened Black men had higher odds of an elevated PSA (P < 0.001), but the likelihood of receiving a biopsy postelevated PSA did not significantly differ from White men (P = 0.821). Additionally, those screened at age ≥ 70 were more likely to be White, have at least a college education, and be homeowners (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>White men, despite starting at a later age, are screened with PSAs more frequently than minorities, and often undergo screening at older ages outside the recommended guidelines. Black men did not have a higher rate of biopsy after having an elevated PSA compared to White men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用All of Us数据库研究美国不同种族前列腺癌(PCa)筛查的差异。材料和方法:包括白人、黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲男性,年龄≥40岁,排除与PCa筛查相冲突的诊断。我们根据美国泌尿学会指南,使用多变量logistic回归(MLR)和Cox时间-事件模型,将种族、年龄、收入、教育、保险和房屋所有权作为独立变量,分析前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查率。还比较了初始筛查年龄和活检率。结果:在56,473人中,18,088人进行了PSA检测:白人占74%,黑人占15%,西班牙裔占9%,亚洲人占2%。与白人男性相比,西班牙裔(20%)和黑人(21%)少数族裔接受PSA筛查的可能性较低(39%,P < 0.001)。然而,与白人男性在58岁时首次检测PSA相比,少数族裔在53-54岁时首次检测PSA较早(P < 0.001)。MLR显示种族、年龄、收入、教育程度、保险类型和房屋所有权是筛选预测因子(P < 0.001)。筛查后的黑人男性PSA升高的几率更高(P < 0.001),但PSA升高后接受活检的可能性与白人男性没有显著差异(P = 0.821)。此外,年龄≥70岁的筛查者更有可能是白人,至少受过大学教育,并且是房主(P < 0.001)。结论:白人男性尽管开始年龄较晚,但接受psa筛查的频率高于少数民族男性,而且通常在推荐指南之外的年龄进行筛查。与白人男性相比,黑人男性PSA升高后的活检率并不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Testing rates and screening disparities in the all of us dataset.

Purpose: To examine prostate cancer (PCa) screening disparities among ethnic groups in the U.S. using the All of Us database.

Material and methods: White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian males ≥ 40 years old were included, excluding diagnosis's that conflict with PCa screening. We analyzed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates by age based on American Urological Association guidelines, using multivariable logistic regression (MLR) and a Cox time-to-event models that considered race, age, income, education, insurance, and home ownership as independent variables. Initial screening ages and biopsy rates were also compared.

Results: Of 56,473 individuals, 18,088 had PSA measurements: 74% White, 15% Black, 9% Hispanic, and 2% Asian. Hispanic (20%) and Black (21%) minorities were less likely to undergo PSA screening compared to White men (39%, P < 0.001). However, minorities had their initial PSA earlier with their first test from 53-54 years old compared to White men at 58 years (P < 0.001). MLR revealed race, age, income, education, insurance type, and home ownership as screening predictors (P < 0.001). Screened Black men had higher odds of an elevated PSA (P < 0.001), but the likelihood of receiving a biopsy postelevated PSA did not significantly differ from White men (P = 0.821). Additionally, those screened at age ≥ 70 were more likely to be White, have at least a college education, and be homeowners (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: White men, despite starting at a later age, are screened with PSAs more frequently than minorities, and often undergo screening at older ages outside the recommended guidelines. Black men did not have a higher rate of biopsy after having an elevated PSA compared to White men.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Functional, oncological, regret and complications following partial gland cryo-ablation for low-risk prostate cancer associated with MPMRI targets. Cumulative smoking exposure impacts oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Impact of baseline PD-L1 status in BCG naive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer on outcomes and changes after BCG exposure. Safety and efficacy of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation for superficial recurrence following bladder-sparing therapy of muscle invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study. Reducing infectious complications and healthcare costs in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with single-dose cefmetazole and levofloxacin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1