四钩定位针与双钩定位针在术前肺结节定位中的比较:疗效、安全性和患者感知。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1
Nan Wang, Kai Xie, Haitao Ma, Gaoming Wang, Wei Song
{"title":"四钩定位针与双钩定位针在术前肺结节定位中的比较:疗效、安全性和患者感知。","authors":"Nan Wang, Kai Xie, Haitao Ma, Gaoming Wang, Wei Song","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise preoperative localization is crucial for improving the success rate and reducing the duration of thoracoscopic surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient perception of the four-hook localization needle compared to the traditional double-hook localization needle in the localization of pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 207 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Seventy-six patients used a four-hook localization needle preoperatively, while 121 patients used the traditional double-hook needle. Propensity score matching was employed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups and minimize confounding bias. We compared the surgery success rate, surgical field success rate, complication rate, and post-localization respiratory pain score between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both localization methods achieved a 100% success rate. The four-hook needle had a statistically significant shorter localization time (20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046) and a lower preoperative displacement rate (5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014) compared to the double-hook needle. Both before and after propensity score matching, the postoperative respiratory pain score was significantly lower in the four-hook group compared to the double-hook group (P < 0.001). After balancing baseline characteristics, univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate (P = 0.039) logistic regression analyses indicated that the four-hook group had a significantly lower risk of localization complications compared to the double-hook group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The four-hook localization needle outperforms the traditional double-hook needle due to its shorter localization time, lower post-localization respiratory pain score, and reduced displacement rate, making it a simpler and safer option. Furthermore, the four-hook needle effectively reduces the risk of complications, presenting a promising method for preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing four-hook and double-hook localization needles in preoperative pulmonary nodule positioning: efficacy, safety, and patient perception.\",\"authors\":\"Nan Wang, Kai Xie, Haitao Ma, Gaoming Wang, Wei Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise preoperative localization is crucial for improving the success rate and reducing the duration of thoracoscopic surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient perception of the four-hook localization needle compared to the traditional double-hook localization needle in the localization of pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 207 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Seventy-six patients used a four-hook localization needle preoperatively, while 121 patients used the traditional double-hook needle. Propensity score matching was employed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups and minimize confounding bias. We compared the surgery success rate, surgical field success rate, complication rate, and post-localization respiratory pain score between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both localization methods achieved a 100% success rate. The four-hook needle had a statistically significant shorter localization time (20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046) and a lower preoperative displacement rate (5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014) compared to the double-hook needle. Both before and after propensity score matching, the postoperative respiratory pain score was significantly lower in the four-hook group compared to the double-hook group (P < 0.001). After balancing baseline characteristics, univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate (P = 0.039) logistic regression analyses indicated that the four-hook group had a significantly lower risk of localization complications compared to the double-hook group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The four-hook localization needle outperforms the traditional double-hook needle due to its shorter localization time, lower post-localization respiratory pain score, and reduced displacement rate, making it a simpler and safer option. Furthermore, the four-hook needle effectively reduces the risk of complications, presenting a promising method for preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03593-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术前精确定位是提高胸腔镜手术成功率和缩短手术时间的关键。本研究旨在评价四钩定位针与传统双钩定位针在肺结节定位中的疗效、安全性和患者感知。方法:我们对207例接受电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者进行回顾性分析。术前使用四钩定位针76例,使用传统双钩定位针121例。采用倾向评分匹配来平衡两组的基线特征,并尽量减少混杂偏倚。比较两组手术成功率、手术野成功率、并发症发生率及定位后呼吸疼痛评分。结果:两种定位方法的成功率均为100%。与双钩针相比,四钩针定位时间短(20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046),术前移位率低(5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014),具有统计学意义。倾向评分匹配前后,四钩组术后呼吸痛评分均明显低于双钩组(P结论:四钩定位针定位时间短,定位后呼吸痛评分低,移位率低,优于传统双钩针,是一种更简单、更安全的选择。此外,四钩针有效地降低了并发症的风险,为术前定位肺结节提供了一种很有前景的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing four-hook and double-hook localization needles in preoperative pulmonary nodule positioning: efficacy, safety, and patient perception.

Background: Precise preoperative localization is crucial for improving the success rate and reducing the duration of thoracoscopic surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient perception of the four-hook localization needle compared to the traditional double-hook localization needle in the localization of pulmonary nodules.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 207 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Seventy-six patients used a four-hook localization needle preoperatively, while 121 patients used the traditional double-hook needle. Propensity score matching was employed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups and minimize confounding bias. We compared the surgery success rate, surgical field success rate, complication rate, and post-localization respiratory pain score between the two groups.

Results: Both localization methods achieved a 100% success rate. The four-hook needle had a statistically significant shorter localization time (20.00 min vs. 21.00 min, P = 0.046) and a lower preoperative displacement rate (5.81% vs. 17.36%, P = 0.014) compared to the double-hook needle. Both before and after propensity score matching, the postoperative respiratory pain score was significantly lower in the four-hook group compared to the double-hook group (P < 0.001). After balancing baseline characteristics, univariate (P = 0.036) and multivariate (P = 0.039) logistic regression analyses indicated that the four-hook group had a significantly lower risk of localization complications compared to the double-hook group.

Conclusions: The four-hook localization needle outperforms the traditional double-hook needle due to its shorter localization time, lower post-localization respiratory pain score, and reduced displacement rate, making it a simpler and safer option. Furthermore, the four-hook needle effectively reduces the risk of complications, presenting a promising method for preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective, comparative study. Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study. Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Efficacy comparison of optimal natural orifice specimen extraction for robotic middle rectal cancer resection in women: transanal or transvaginal orifice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1