检测舒适度、疼痛和下肢丧失个体在临床里程碑上的活动变化。

Q3 Medicine Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890
B M Pousett, C C Harasym, M S Rapaport, T Richardson, J Spellen, D W Moe, W C Miller
{"title":"检测舒适度、疼痛和下肢丧失个体在临床里程碑上的活动变化。","authors":"B M Pousett, C C Harasym, M S Rapaport, T Richardson, J Spellen, D W Moe, W C Miller","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional mobility, comfort and the absence of pain are key goals of prosthetic treatment. Outcome measures (OMs) evaluate the impact of treatment and normative and minimal detectable change (MDC) values are key to interpreting these scores and measuring treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to 1) present practice-based normative values of four commonly used OMs at four prosthetic milestones and 2) explore the MDC of the measures over the treatment period.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A chart review was conducted of OMs collected with individuals with lower limb loss between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. This included data for individuals with unilateral transtibial (TT), transfemoral (TF) and rotationplasty (RP) amputations and bilateral transtibial amputation (BTT). OMs included the Socket Comfort Score (SCS), Pain Scale (PS), 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT), and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Data were collected at four milestone time points: (1) Baseline and (2) Discharge from Rehabilitation for those in initial prosthetic rehabilitation, and (3) Initial Evaluation and (4) Definitive Delivery for those receiving a replacement socket. Normative values and MDC values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Data from 30 individuals undergoing in-patient rehabilitation and 74 individuals receiving a replacement socket were included. Practice-based normative data were different for each level of amputation and milestone and had the following ranges: SCS: 5.7 - 9.1, PS: 0.8 - 3.7, 2MWT: 68.4 - 146.3 m and PLUS-M: 38.9 - 57.3. MDC values also varied based on time in treatment (Rehabilitation: SCS = 2.5, PS = 1.6, 2MWT = 32.6, PLUS-M = 8.8; Replacement Socket: SCS = 3.1, PS = 2.6, 2MWT = 38.9, PLUS-M = 4.0). All measures had a statistically significant change over the intervention, however, no average scores changed by greater than the MDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The normative data and MDC scores demonstrate the PS & PLUS-M are useful measures of pain and mobility at all points within treatment. The 2MWT is indicated for individuals in rehabilitation, while the SCS is indicated for those receiving a replacement socket, as both effectively measure treatment goals that are particularly important for each phase of rehabilitation. This provides clinicians with practice-based evidence that enables them to interpret OM scores, a critical part of the decision-making process along the treatment journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"43890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting Changes in Comfort, Pain, and Mobility Over Clinical Milestones for Individuals With Lower Limb Loss.\",\"authors\":\"B M Pousett, C C Harasym, M S Rapaport, T Richardson, J Spellen, D W Moe, W C Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional mobility, comfort and the absence of pain are key goals of prosthetic treatment. Outcome measures (OMs) evaluate the impact of treatment and normative and minimal detectable change (MDC) values are key to interpreting these scores and measuring treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to 1) present practice-based normative values of four commonly used OMs at four prosthetic milestones and 2) explore the MDC of the measures over the treatment period.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A chart review was conducted of OMs collected with individuals with lower limb loss between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. This included data for individuals with unilateral transtibial (TT), transfemoral (TF) and rotationplasty (RP) amputations and bilateral transtibial amputation (BTT). OMs included the Socket Comfort Score (SCS), Pain Scale (PS), 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT), and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Data were collected at four milestone time points: (1) Baseline and (2) Discharge from Rehabilitation for those in initial prosthetic rehabilitation, and (3) Initial Evaluation and (4) Definitive Delivery for those receiving a replacement socket. Normative values and MDC values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Data from 30 individuals undergoing in-patient rehabilitation and 74 individuals receiving a replacement socket were included. Practice-based normative data were different for each level of amputation and milestone and had the following ranges: SCS: 5.7 - 9.1, PS: 0.8 - 3.7, 2MWT: 68.4 - 146.3 m and PLUS-M: 38.9 - 57.3. MDC values also varied based on time in treatment (Rehabilitation: SCS = 2.5, PS = 1.6, 2MWT = 32.6, PLUS-M = 8.8; Replacement Socket: SCS = 3.1, PS = 2.6, 2MWT = 38.9, PLUS-M = 4.0). All measures had a statistically significant change over the intervention, however, no average scores changed by greater than the MDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The normative data and MDC scores demonstrate the PS & PLUS-M are useful measures of pain and mobility at all points within treatment. The 2MWT is indicated for individuals in rehabilitation, while the SCS is indicated for those receiving a replacement socket, as both effectively measure treatment goals that are particularly important for each phase of rehabilitation. This provides clinicians with practice-based evidence that enables them to interpret OM scores, a critical part of the decision-making process along the treatment journey.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"43890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能活动、舒适和无疼痛是假肢治疗的关键目标。结果测量(OMs)评估治疗的影响,而规范和最小可检测变化(MDC)值是解释这些评分和衡量治疗结果的关键。目的:本研究旨在1)提出基于实践的四种常用OMs在四个假肢里程碑的规范价值,2)探索治疗期间措施的MDC。方法:对2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间收集的下肢丧失患者的OMs进行图表回顾。这包括单侧经胫骨(TT)、经股骨(TF)和旋转成形术(RP)截肢和双侧经胫骨截肢(BTT)患者的数据。OMs包括关节窝舒适评分(SCS)、疼痛量表(PS)、2分钟步行测试(2MWT)和假肢使用者活动能力调查(PLUS-M)。在四个里程碑时间点收集数据:(1)初始假肢康复患者的基线和(2)康复出院,以及(3)接受替代牙槽的患者的初始评估和(4)最终交付。计算标准值和MDC值。研究结果:数据来自30名接受住院康复治疗的患者和74名接受更换牙槽的患者。基于实践的标准数据对于每个截肢级别和里程碑都是不同的,其范围如下:SCS: 5.7 - 9.1, PS: 0.8 - 3.7, 2MWT: 68.4 - 146.3 m和PLUS-M: 38.9 - 57.3。MDC值也随治疗时间而变化(康复:SCS = 2.5, PS = 1.6, 2MWT = 32.6, PLUS-M = 8.8;更换插座:SCS = 3.1, PS = 2.6, 2MWT = 38.9, PLUS-M = 4.0)。在干预期间,所有的措施在统计上都有显著的变化,但是平均得分的变化都没有超过民主变革运动。结论:规范数据和MDC评分表明PS和PLUS-M是治疗期间所有点疼痛和活动的有用测量。2MWT用于康复中的个体,而SCS用于接受替代插座的个体,因为两者都有效地衡量治疗目标,这对康复的每个阶段都特别重要。这为临床医生提供了基于实践的证据,使他们能够解释OM评分,这是治疗过程中决策过程的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detecting Changes in Comfort, Pain, and Mobility Over Clinical Milestones for Individuals With Lower Limb Loss.

Background: Functional mobility, comfort and the absence of pain are key goals of prosthetic treatment. Outcome measures (OMs) evaluate the impact of treatment and normative and minimal detectable change (MDC) values are key to interpreting these scores and measuring treatment outcomes.

Objectives: This study seeks to 1) present practice-based normative values of four commonly used OMs at four prosthetic milestones and 2) explore the MDC of the measures over the treatment period.

Methodology: A chart review was conducted of OMs collected with individuals with lower limb loss between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. This included data for individuals with unilateral transtibial (TT), transfemoral (TF) and rotationplasty (RP) amputations and bilateral transtibial amputation (BTT). OMs included the Socket Comfort Score (SCS), Pain Scale (PS), 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT), and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Data were collected at four milestone time points: (1) Baseline and (2) Discharge from Rehabilitation for those in initial prosthetic rehabilitation, and (3) Initial Evaluation and (4) Definitive Delivery for those receiving a replacement socket. Normative values and MDC values were calculated.

Findings: Data from 30 individuals undergoing in-patient rehabilitation and 74 individuals receiving a replacement socket were included. Practice-based normative data were different for each level of amputation and milestone and had the following ranges: SCS: 5.7 - 9.1, PS: 0.8 - 3.7, 2MWT: 68.4 - 146.3 m and PLUS-M: 38.9 - 57.3. MDC values also varied based on time in treatment (Rehabilitation: SCS = 2.5, PS = 1.6, 2MWT = 32.6, PLUS-M = 8.8; Replacement Socket: SCS = 3.1, PS = 2.6, 2MWT = 38.9, PLUS-M = 4.0). All measures had a statistically significant change over the intervention, however, no average scores changed by greater than the MDC.

Conclusions: The normative data and MDC scores demonstrate the PS & PLUS-M are useful measures of pain and mobility at all points within treatment. The 2MWT is indicated for individuals in rehabilitation, while the SCS is indicated for those receiving a replacement socket, as both effectively measure treatment goals that are particularly important for each phase of rehabilitation. This provides clinicians with practice-based evidence that enables them to interpret OM scores, a critical part of the decision-making process along the treatment journey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Active, Actuated, and Assistive: a Scoping Review of Exoskeletons for the Hands and Wrists. The Effect of a Modified Tenodesis Wrist-hand Orthosis on Hand Function in Patients With Tetraplegia. Detecting Changes in Comfort, Pain, and Mobility Over Clinical Milestones for Individuals With Lower Limb Loss. Feasibility of a Yoga Intervention in an Inpatient Limb Loss Rehabilitation Program. Invisible Struggles: Exploring Challenges Faced by Women With Amputation in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1