数字社会中的研究数据使用:审慎的公众参与。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2372
Kimberlyn M McGrail, Jack Teng, Colene Bentley, Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess
{"title":"数字社会中的研究数据使用:审慎的公众参与。","authors":"Kimberlyn M McGrail, Jack Teng, Colene Bentley, Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sources of public and private data and ways to link them continue to evolve. This offers new opportunities for research, and new reasons for data-holding organisations to form partnerships. While research using these data can be beneficial, there is also a potential for negative consequences for some individuals or groups, including unintended or unanticipated effects. It is important to consult the public on how we might achieve both opportunities to link different types of data for research purposes, and protections against the misuse of data and the possibility of negative consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Combining data sources for research was the topic of four days of deliberation held in British Columbia, Canada in late 2019. Public deliberation events bring diverse groups of people together to give direct input to policy makers, through carefully structured in-depth discussion on issues that are controversial and/or a source of public concern. Participants discussed whether data from electronic medical records should be used for research purposes, whether it is acceptable to combine data from public and private sources, who should authorise its use in research, and how a public advisory group on data use might be structured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over four days, 29 residents of BC developed 17 deliberative conclusions that can be grouped into four broad topic areas: balancing benefit and potential harms when linking data; the protections that are expected to govern use of data; the type of authorisation required; and how the public should be involved in an ongoing way. Overall, the public is very supportive of research as long as oversight and controls are in place, including ongoing input from members of the public.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deliberative conclusions from this event provide essential public input on the use of linked data for research, in particular when those data come from multiple sources. This is important information as policy-makers continue to develop legislation and practices around the use and linkage of both public and private sources of data.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"2372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberlyn M McGrail, Jack Teng, Colene Bentley, Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sources of public and private data and ways to link them continue to evolve. This offers new opportunities for research, and new reasons for data-holding organisations to form partnerships. While research using these data can be beneficial, there is also a potential for negative consequences for some individuals or groups, including unintended or unanticipated effects. It is important to consult the public on how we might achieve both opportunities to link different types of data for research purposes, and protections against the misuse of data and the possibility of negative consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Combining data sources for research was the topic of four days of deliberation held in British Columbia, Canada in late 2019. Public deliberation events bring diverse groups of people together to give direct input to policy makers, through carefully structured in-depth discussion on issues that are controversial and/or a source of public concern. Participants discussed whether data from electronic medical records should be used for research purposes, whether it is acceptable to combine data from public and private sources, who should authorise its use in research, and how a public advisory group on data use might be structured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over four days, 29 residents of BC developed 17 deliberative conclusions that can be grouped into four broad topic areas: balancing benefit and potential harms when linking data; the protections that are expected to govern use of data; the type of authorisation required; and how the public should be involved in an ongoing way. Overall, the public is very supportive of research as long as oversight and controls are in place, including ongoing input from members of the public.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deliberative conclusions from this event provide essential public input on the use of linked data for research, in particular when those data come from multiple sources. This is important information as policy-makers continue to develop legislation and practices around the use and linkage of both public and private sources of data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"2372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606539/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公共和私人数据的来源以及连接它们的方式在不断发展。这为研究提供了新的机会,也为数据持有组织建立伙伴关系提供了新的理由。虽然使用这些数据进行研究可能是有益的,但也可能对某些个人或群体产生负面影响,包括意想不到或未预料到的影响。重要的是,我们应该咨询公众,了解我们如何既能有机会将不同类型的数据联系起来用于研究目的,又能防止数据滥用和可能产生的负面后果。方法:结合数据来源进行研究是2019年底在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省举行的为期四天的审议主题。公众审议活动将不同群体聚集在一起,通过对有争议和/或公众关注的问题进行精心组织的深入讨论,向政策制定者提供直接意见。与会者讨论了电子医疗记录的数据是否应用于研究目的,将公共和私人来源的数据结合起来是否可以接受,谁应授权在研究中使用这些数据,以及如何组织一个关于数据使用的公共咨询小组。结果:在四天的时间里,不列颠哥伦比亚省的29名居民得出了17个经过审议的结论,这些结论可以分为四个广泛的主题领域:在连接数据时平衡利益和潜在危害;管理数据使用的保护措施;所需的授权类型;以及公众应该如何持续参与。总的来说,只要监督和控制到位,包括公众成员的持续投入,公众就非常支持研究。结论:本次活动的审慎结论为使用关联数据进行研究提供了重要的公众意见,特别是当这些数据来自多个来源时。这是重要的信息,因为决策者继续围绕公共和私人数据来源的使用和联系制定立法和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.

Background: Sources of public and private data and ways to link them continue to evolve. This offers new opportunities for research, and new reasons for data-holding organisations to form partnerships. While research using these data can be beneficial, there is also a potential for negative consequences for some individuals or groups, including unintended or unanticipated effects. It is important to consult the public on how we might achieve both opportunities to link different types of data for research purposes, and protections against the misuse of data and the possibility of negative consequences.

Methods: Combining data sources for research was the topic of four days of deliberation held in British Columbia, Canada in late 2019. Public deliberation events bring diverse groups of people together to give direct input to policy makers, through carefully structured in-depth discussion on issues that are controversial and/or a source of public concern. Participants discussed whether data from electronic medical records should be used for research purposes, whether it is acceptable to combine data from public and private sources, who should authorise its use in research, and how a public advisory group on data use might be structured.

Results: Over four days, 29 residents of BC developed 17 deliberative conclusions that can be grouped into four broad topic areas: balancing benefit and potential harms when linking data; the protections that are expected to govern use of data; the type of authorisation required; and how the public should be involved in an ongoing way. Overall, the public is very supportive of research as long as oversight and controls are in place, including ongoing input from members of the public.

Conclusion: Deliberative conclusions from this event provide essential public input on the use of linked data for research, in particular when those data come from multiple sources. This is important information as policy-makers continue to develop legislation and practices around the use and linkage of both public and private sources of data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neonates With In-Utero SSRI Exposure (NeoWISE): a retrospective cohort study examining the effect of newborn feeding method on newborn withdrawal. Secondary use of routinely collected administrative health data for epidemiologic research: Answering research questions using data collected for a different purpose. Validity of heart failure diagnoses, treatments, and readmissions in the Danish National Patient Registry. Creating an 11-year longitudinal substance use harm cohort from linked health and census data to analyse social drivers of health. Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1