打破车轮、可信度和解释学上的不公正:对哈里斯的回应。

Q1 Arts and Humanities Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7
Taylor Matthews
{"title":"打破车轮、可信度和解释学上的不公正:对哈里斯的回应。","authors":"Taylor Matthews","doi":"10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper \"Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof\". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the \"reactive\" and \"proactive\" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"37 4","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the Wheel, Credibility, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Harris.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper \\\"Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof\\\". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the \\\"reactive\\\" and \\\"proactive\\\" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇短文中,我回应了Keith Raymond Harris的论文“合成媒体、车轮和举证责任”。特别是,我研究了他反对两种主要方法的论点,这些方法用于处理合成媒体,如深度伪造和其他GenAI内容,即“反应性”和“前瞻性”方法。在第一部分中,我提出了哈里斯对被动方法问题的担忧,然后提供了一种建设性的方法来扩展他对主动方法的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breaking the Wheel, Credibility, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Harris.

In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper "Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the "reactive" and "proactive" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
期刊最新文献
What is the Point of Social Media? Corporate Purpose and Digital Democratization. Can AI Rely on the Systematicity of Truth? The Challenge of Modelling Normative Domains. Track Thyself? The Value and Ethics of Self-knowledge Through Technology. The Incalculability of the Generated Text. Authorship and ChatGPT: a Conservative View.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1