Yasaman Emad, Sonja P Neef, Lynne Taylor, Ngaire Kerse, Alana Cavadino, Simon A Moyes, Kate Comber, Xiaojing S Wu, Janine Molloy, Catherine J Bacon
{"title":"照明对跌倒的影响:照明水平对长期住宿护理机构跌倒风险的影响。","authors":"Yasaman Emad, Sonja P Neef, Lynne Taylor, Ngaire Kerse, Alana Cavadino, Simon A Moyes, Kate Comber, Xiaojing S Wu, Janine Molloy, Catherine J Bacon","doi":"10.1177/07334648241302552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare lighting levels in care facilities with local recommendations and determine their cross-sectional association with fall rate, we recruited residents (<i>n</i> = 126) from 12 long-term care facilities (mean ± SD age 85.1 ± 7.9 years; 64.3% female). Lighting levels were measured at different times in various areas within facilities, according to each resident's movements and habitual use of light. Lighting fell short of focused activity recommendations in 57.7% of bedrooms and 68.5% of bathrooms (bathing and toileting areas); 22.8% and 41.9%, respectively, were also below general activity recommendations. Lower bedroom and overall lighting correlated with higher fall rates (all <i>p</i> < .05). Covariate-adjusted negative binomial models showed lighting in dining rooms (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.98; <i>p</i> = .005) for 100 lux increase), bathrooms (IRR = 0.87 [0.78-0.98]; <i>p</i> = .016), and overall (IRR = 0.91 [0.83-1.00]; <i>p</i> = .03-.04) predicted lower fall rates. Areas used by care facility residents commonly have lower than recommended lighting levels, which increases fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648241302552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding Light on Falls: The Effect of Lighting Levels on Fall Risk in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Yasaman Emad, Sonja P Neef, Lynne Taylor, Ngaire Kerse, Alana Cavadino, Simon A Moyes, Kate Comber, Xiaojing S Wu, Janine Molloy, Catherine J Bacon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07334648241302552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare lighting levels in care facilities with local recommendations and determine their cross-sectional association with fall rate, we recruited residents (<i>n</i> = 126) from 12 long-term care facilities (mean ± SD age 85.1 ± 7.9 years; 64.3% female). Lighting levels were measured at different times in various areas within facilities, according to each resident's movements and habitual use of light. Lighting fell short of focused activity recommendations in 57.7% of bedrooms and 68.5% of bathrooms (bathing and toileting areas); 22.8% and 41.9%, respectively, were also below general activity recommendations. Lower bedroom and overall lighting correlated with higher fall rates (all <i>p</i> < .05). Covariate-adjusted negative binomial models showed lighting in dining rooms (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.98; <i>p</i> = .005) for 100 lux increase), bathrooms (IRR = 0.87 [0.78-0.98]; <i>p</i> = .016), and overall (IRR = 0.91 [0.83-1.00]; <i>p</i> = .03-.04) predicted lower fall rates. Areas used by care facility residents commonly have lower than recommended lighting levels, which increases fall risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7334648241302552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241302552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241302552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shedding Light on Falls: The Effect of Lighting Levels on Fall Risk in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities.
To compare lighting levels in care facilities with local recommendations and determine their cross-sectional association with fall rate, we recruited residents (n = 126) from 12 long-term care facilities (mean ± SD age 85.1 ± 7.9 years; 64.3% female). Lighting levels were measured at different times in various areas within facilities, according to each resident's movements and habitual use of light. Lighting fell short of focused activity recommendations in 57.7% of bedrooms and 68.5% of bathrooms (bathing and toileting areas); 22.8% and 41.9%, respectively, were also below general activity recommendations. Lower bedroom and overall lighting correlated with higher fall rates (all p < .05). Covariate-adjusted negative binomial models showed lighting in dining rooms (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.98; p = .005) for 100 lux increase), bathrooms (IRR = 0.87 [0.78-0.98]; p = .016), and overall (IRR = 0.91 [0.83-1.00]; p = .03-.04) predicted lower fall rates. Areas used by care facility residents commonly have lower than recommended lighting levels, which increases fall risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.