审查在欧盟、意大利、法国和瑞士卫生数据共享立法中纳入信任和建立信任原则:框架分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12722
Federica Zavattaro, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille
{"title":"审查在欧盟、意大利、法国和瑞士卫生数据共享立法中纳入信任和建立信任原则:框架分析。","authors":"Federica Zavattaro, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points First, policymakers can strengthen the inherent trust-building effect of legislations on citizens by incorporating trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner to explicitly signal public trust to policy implementers as one of the policy outcomes to be achieved in the implementation phase. Second, policymakers can use the proposed \"public trust in health data sharing\" framework as an initial guide to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Public trust is critical to both system legitimacy and the successful implementation of data-driven health initiatives. Legislations are an essential instrument for building public trust, as they can have a dual effect on trust: a passive effect by reinforcing the public perception of an active regulatory system that upholds the rule of law and an active effect as a tool for policymakers to signal trust-building actions to be undertaken during the implementation phase. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which health data-sharing legislations contain references to trust and trust-building principles for their practical implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By applying an evidence-based \"public trust in health data sharing\" framework, 36 legislations from the European Union (EU), Italy, France, and Switzerland on health data sharing were analyzed to assess 1) how the term \"trust\" is embedded in legislations, and 2) the presence and quality of trust-building principles within the selected legislations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine legislations incorporated references to \"trust,\" mainly within the explanatory memorandum and preambles of EU legislations. The most prevalent trust-building principles were \"agencies of accountability\" (72%) and data \"security\" (70%). In contrast, the principles \"public information\" (14%) and \"time\" (6%) were the least presented. Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that the majority of the trust-building principles were implicit in the legal text, with Swiss legislations having the highest number of explicit references.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited and implicit use of \"trust\" and trust-building principles in EU, Italian, French, and Swiss legislation emphasizes the opportunity to raise policymakers' awareness of these principles. The proposed framework provides an initial guide for policymakers to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner. This ensures that policy implementers at various stages of the policy process can implement trust-building actions, contributing to public trust building in both European and national health data-sharing initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"973-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust-Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Zavattaro, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0009.12722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policy Points First, policymakers can strengthen the inherent trust-building effect of legislations on citizens by incorporating trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner to explicitly signal public trust to policy implementers as one of the policy outcomes to be achieved in the implementation phase. Second, policymakers can use the proposed \\\"public trust in health data sharing\\\" framework as an initial guide to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Public trust is critical to both system legitimacy and the successful implementation of data-driven health initiatives. Legislations are an essential instrument for building public trust, as they can have a dual effect on trust: a passive effect by reinforcing the public perception of an active regulatory system that upholds the rule of law and an active effect as a tool for policymakers to signal trust-building actions to be undertaken during the implementation phase. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which health data-sharing legislations contain references to trust and trust-building principles for their practical implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By applying an evidence-based \\\"public trust in health data sharing\\\" framework, 36 legislations from the European Union (EU), Italy, France, and Switzerland on health data sharing were analyzed to assess 1) how the term \\\"trust\\\" is embedded in legislations, and 2) the presence and quality of trust-building principles within the selected legislations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine legislations incorporated references to \\\"trust,\\\" mainly within the explanatory memorandum and preambles of EU legislations. The most prevalent trust-building principles were \\\"agencies of accountability\\\" (72%) and data \\\"security\\\" (70%). In contrast, the principles \\\"public information\\\" (14%) and \\\"time\\\" (6%) were the least presented. Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that the majority of the trust-building principles were implicit in the legal text, with Swiss legislations having the highest number of explicit references.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited and implicit use of \\\"trust\\\" and trust-building principles in EU, Italian, French, and Swiss legislation emphasizes the opportunity to raise policymakers' awareness of these principles. The proposed framework provides an initial guide for policymakers to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner. This ensures that policy implementers at various stages of the policy process can implement trust-building actions, contributing to public trust building in both European and national health data-sharing initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"973-1003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654760/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12722\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首先,政策制定者可以加强立法对公民固有的信任建立效果,将建立信任原则以可识别和全面的方式纳入卫生数据共享立法,明确向政策执行者发出公众信任的信号,作为在实施阶段要实现的政策成果之一。其次,决策者可以利用拟议的“卫生数据共享中的公众信任”框架作为初步指南,将建立信任的原则纳入卫生数据共享立法。背景:公众信任对于系统合法性和成功实施数据驱动的卫生行动至关重要。立法是建立公众信任的重要工具,因为它们可以对信任产生双重影响:通过强化公众对维护法治的积极监管体系的看法产生被动影响,以及作为政策制定者在实施阶段表明将采取的建立信任行动的工具产生积极影响。然而,关于卫生数据共享立法在多大程度上提及信任和建立信任原则以便实际实施的证据有限。方法:采用基于证据的“卫生数据共享中的公共信任”框架,对来自欧盟、意大利、法国和瑞士的36项卫生数据共享立法进行分析,以评估1)“信任”一词如何嵌入立法,以及2)选定立法中信任建设原则的存在和质量。研究发现:九项立法主要在欧盟立法的解释性备忘录和序言中提到了“信托”。最普遍的信任建立原则是“问责机构”(72%)和数据“安全”(70%)。相比之下,“公开信息”(14%)和“时间”(6%)原则被提及的最少。此外,定性分析表明,大多数建立信任的原则都隐含在法律案文中,瑞士立法中明确提及的次数最多。结论:欧盟、意大利、法国和瑞士立法中对“信任”和信任建设原则的有限和隐含使用强调了提高政策制定者对这些原则的认识的机会。拟议的框架为决策者提供了初步指南,以便以可识别和全面的方式将建立信任原则纳入卫生数据共享立法。这确保政策执行者在政策进程的各个阶段能够执行建立信任的行动,有助于在欧洲和国家卫生数据共享倡议中建立公众信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust-Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis.

Policy Points First, policymakers can strengthen the inherent trust-building effect of legislations on citizens by incorporating trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner to explicitly signal public trust to policy implementers as one of the policy outcomes to be achieved in the implementation phase. Second, policymakers can use the proposed "public trust in health data sharing" framework as an initial guide to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations.

Context: Public trust is critical to both system legitimacy and the successful implementation of data-driven health initiatives. Legislations are an essential instrument for building public trust, as they can have a dual effect on trust: a passive effect by reinforcing the public perception of an active regulatory system that upholds the rule of law and an active effect as a tool for policymakers to signal trust-building actions to be undertaken during the implementation phase. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which health data-sharing legislations contain references to trust and trust-building principles for their practical implementation.

Methods: By applying an evidence-based "public trust in health data sharing" framework, 36 legislations from the European Union (EU), Italy, France, and Switzerland on health data sharing were analyzed to assess 1) how the term "trust" is embedded in legislations, and 2) the presence and quality of trust-building principles within the selected legislations.

Findings: Nine legislations incorporated references to "trust," mainly within the explanatory memorandum and preambles of EU legislations. The most prevalent trust-building principles were "agencies of accountability" (72%) and data "security" (70%). In contrast, the principles "public information" (14%) and "time" (6%) were the least presented. Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that the majority of the trust-building principles were implicit in the legal text, with Swiss legislations having the highest number of explicit references.

Conclusions: The limited and implicit use of "trust" and trust-building principles in EU, Italian, French, and Swiss legislation emphasizes the opportunity to raise policymakers' awareness of these principles. The proposed framework provides an initial guide for policymakers to incorporate trust-building principles within health data-sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner. This ensures that policy implementers at various stages of the policy process can implement trust-building actions, contributing to public trust building in both European and national health data-sharing initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
期刊最新文献
Innovative Insurance to Improve US Patient Access to Cell and Gene Therapy. How Are You Doing… Really? A Review of Whole Person Health Assessments. Mental Health Treatment Access: Experience, Hypotheticals, and Public Opinion. Comprehensiveness in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Reforming Physician Licensure in the United States to Improve Access to Telehealth: State, Regional, and Federal Initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1