“竞争噪音”:背景噪音如何影响轻度至中度失语症患者的沟通体验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00354
Tyson G Harmon, Riley Hegewald, Christopher Dromey
{"title":"“竞争噪音”:背景噪音如何影响轻度至中度失语症患者的沟通体验。","authors":"Tyson G Harmon, Riley Hegewald, Christopher Dromey","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the subjective experiences of people with aphasia when communicating in the presence of various types of background noise. We hypothesized that (a) people with aphasia would report greater perceived effort and stress than controls when talking in noise, (b) perceived effort and stress would be greater in noise than silence, and (c) people with aphasia would describe more negative reactions to communicating in noise than controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eleven people with aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched controls retold stories in a baseline silent condition and five background noise conditions (pink noise, cocktail party, monologue, one-sided phone call, and conversation) and rated their perceived effort and stress after each story. Participants then described their experience in a semistructured interview. Perceived effort and stress ratings were analyzed statistically using quantitative methods. Interview data were analyzed qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative findings showed that people with aphasia reported significantly greater perceived effort and stress than controls. Across groups, phone call, conversation, and monologue conditions were perceived as either more effortful or stressful than the silent baseline condition. Although both participant groups discussed cognitive and emotional challenges and strategies related to talking in noise, qualitative findings showed distinct difficulties for people with aphasia. Specifically, unlike controls, participants with aphasia mentioned difficulty ignoring background noise, decreased processing speed, fatigue, negative emotional reactions, deliberately focusing, slowing down/taking breaks, and consciously regulating their emotions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although aphasia therapy often occurs in quiet clinic environments, everyday communication does not. The increased perceived difficulty that people with aphasia have for coping with background noise should be acknowledged, and training should be designed to prepare people with aphasia to communicate in noisy environments.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27893445.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"3393-3409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Competing Noises\\\": How Background Noise Impacts the Communication Experiences of People With Mild-to-Moderate Aphasia.\",\"authors\":\"Tyson G Harmon, Riley Hegewald, Christopher Dromey\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the subjective experiences of people with aphasia when communicating in the presence of various types of background noise. We hypothesized that (a) people with aphasia would report greater perceived effort and stress than controls when talking in noise, (b) perceived effort and stress would be greater in noise than silence, and (c) people with aphasia would describe more negative reactions to communicating in noise than controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eleven people with aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched controls retold stories in a baseline silent condition and five background noise conditions (pink noise, cocktail party, monologue, one-sided phone call, and conversation) and rated their perceived effort and stress after each story. Participants then described their experience in a semistructured interview. Perceived effort and stress ratings were analyzed statistically using quantitative methods. Interview data were analyzed qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative findings showed that people with aphasia reported significantly greater perceived effort and stress than controls. Across groups, phone call, conversation, and monologue conditions were perceived as either more effortful or stressful than the silent baseline condition. Although both participant groups discussed cognitive and emotional challenges and strategies related to talking in noise, qualitative findings showed distinct difficulties for people with aphasia. Specifically, unlike controls, participants with aphasia mentioned difficulty ignoring background noise, decreased processing speed, fatigue, negative emotional reactions, deliberately focusing, slowing down/taking breaks, and consciously regulating their emotions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although aphasia therapy often occurs in quiet clinic environments, everyday communication does not. The increased perceived difficulty that people with aphasia have for coping with background noise should be acknowledged, and training should be designed to prepare people with aphasia to communicate in noisy environments.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27893445.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3393-3409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00354\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨失语症患者在不同类型的背景噪音下交流时的主观体验。我们假设(a)失语症患者在嘈杂环境中说话时比对照组表现出更大的努力和压力;(b)在嘈杂环境中比在安静环境中表现出更大的努力和压力;(c)失语症患者在嘈杂环境中交流时比对照组表现出更多的消极反应。方法:11名失语症患者和11名年龄和性别匹配的对照组在基线沉默条件和五种背景噪音条件下(粉红色噪音、鸡尾酒会、独白、单方面的电话和谈话)复述故事,并评估他们在每个故事后感知到的努力和压力。然后,参与者在半结构化访谈中描述了他们的经历。感知努力和压力评分采用定量方法进行统计分析。对访谈数据进行定性分析。结果:定量研究结果显示,失语症患者报告的感知努力和压力明显大于对照组。在小组中,打电话、谈话和独白的条件被认为比沉默的基线条件更努力或更有压力。尽管两组参与者都讨论了与在噪音中说话有关的认知和情感挑战以及策略,但定性研究结果显示,失语症患者面临着明显的困难。具体来说,与对照组不同,失语症患者提到难以忽略背景噪音、处理速度下降、疲劳、负面情绪反应、刻意集中注意力、放慢速度/休息、有意识地调节情绪。结论:虽然在安静的临床环境中经常发生失语治疗,但日常交流却不是。我们应该认识到,失语症患者在应对背景噪音方面所面临的日益明显的困难,应该设计培训,使失语症患者做好在嘈杂环境中进行交流的准备。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27893445。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Competing Noises": How Background Noise Impacts the Communication Experiences of People With Mild-to-Moderate Aphasia.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the subjective experiences of people with aphasia when communicating in the presence of various types of background noise. We hypothesized that (a) people with aphasia would report greater perceived effort and stress than controls when talking in noise, (b) perceived effort and stress would be greater in noise than silence, and (c) people with aphasia would describe more negative reactions to communicating in noise than controls.

Method: Eleven people with aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched controls retold stories in a baseline silent condition and five background noise conditions (pink noise, cocktail party, monologue, one-sided phone call, and conversation) and rated their perceived effort and stress after each story. Participants then described their experience in a semistructured interview. Perceived effort and stress ratings were analyzed statistically using quantitative methods. Interview data were analyzed qualitatively.

Results: Quantitative findings showed that people with aphasia reported significantly greater perceived effort and stress than controls. Across groups, phone call, conversation, and monologue conditions were perceived as either more effortful or stressful than the silent baseline condition. Although both participant groups discussed cognitive and emotional challenges and strategies related to talking in noise, qualitative findings showed distinct difficulties for people with aphasia. Specifically, unlike controls, participants with aphasia mentioned difficulty ignoring background noise, decreased processing speed, fatigue, negative emotional reactions, deliberately focusing, slowing down/taking breaks, and consciously regulating their emotions.

Conclusions: Although aphasia therapy often occurs in quiet clinic environments, everyday communication does not. The increased perceived difficulty that people with aphasia have for coping with background noise should be acknowledged, and training should be designed to prepare people with aphasia to communicate in noisy environments.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27893445.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
期刊最新文献
Design Characteristics of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interfaces for Children With Cortical Visual Impairment: Results From Two Focus Groups With Vision Professionals. Developing a Profile of Canadian Children With Cerebral Palsy Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Yale Swallow Protocol in Recently Extubated Patients. Seeing Into the Future: Adults' Accuracy Predicting the Vocabulary of Early Symbolic Communicators Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Development and Pilot Implementation of a Theory-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Protocol for Adults With Chronic Cognitive Complaints After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1