优化急诊科插管后镇痛和镇静的给药和时机。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011
Robert Needleman, Sean Dyer, Kristen A Martinez, Joanne C Routsolias
{"title":"优化急诊科插管后镇痛和镇静的给药和时机。","authors":"Robert Needleman, Sean Dyer, Kristen A Martinez, Joanne C Routsolias","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent literature suggests pain management and sedation in ED patients after rapid sequence intubation are done inconsistently, which impacts patient outcomes negatively. The purpose of this study is to compare rates and timing of post-intubation analgesia and sedation before and after an ED pharmacy practice improvement intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of adult ED patients intubated over an 18-month period. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration before and after implementation of the post-intubation guideline and education. Secondary endpoints included time to analgesia and sedation medication after paralytic administration, comparison between paralytic drugs utilized (succinylcholine and rocuronium), and ED length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to intervention, the mean percentage of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration was 58.6% and 94.3%, respectively. After paralytic administration, the time to dose of analgesia was 63 minutes (range 0-288) and 47 minutes for sedation medication (range 0-214). The mean length of stay in the emergency department was 298 minutes (range 12-3143). Following the intervention, 35 patients met inclusion criteria, and the mean percentage of analgesia and sedation administration was 77.1% and 91.4%, respectively. The mean time to analgesia administration improved to 22 minutes (range 0-123), and sedation improved to 20 minutes (range 0-284). The mean emergency department length of stay decreased to 204 minutes (range 46-469). When comparing paralytic used, mean time to analgesia and sedation was longer in those who received rocuronium compared to succinylcholine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An educational lecture along with a novel ED post-intubation clinical guideline improved rates and timing to analgesia and sedation. This provides a unique opportunity for emergency nurses to advocate for early analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Administration and Timing of Post Intubation Analgesia and Sedation in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Needleman, Sean Dyer, Kristen A Martinez, Joanne C Routsolias\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent literature suggests pain management and sedation in ED patients after rapid sequence intubation are done inconsistently, which impacts patient outcomes negatively. The purpose of this study is to compare rates and timing of post-intubation analgesia and sedation before and after an ED pharmacy practice improvement intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of adult ED patients intubated over an 18-month period. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration before and after implementation of the post-intubation guideline and education. Secondary endpoints included time to analgesia and sedation medication after paralytic administration, comparison between paralytic drugs utilized (succinylcholine and rocuronium), and ED length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to intervention, the mean percentage of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration was 58.6% and 94.3%, respectively. After paralytic administration, the time to dose of analgesia was 63 minutes (range 0-288) and 47 minutes for sedation medication (range 0-214). The mean length of stay in the emergency department was 298 minutes (range 12-3143). Following the intervention, 35 patients met inclusion criteria, and the mean percentage of analgesia and sedation administration was 77.1% and 91.4%, respectively. The mean time to analgesia administration improved to 22 minutes (range 0-123), and sedation improved to 20 minutes (range 0-284). The mean emergency department length of stay decreased to 204 minutes (range 46-469). When comparing paralytic used, mean time to analgesia and sedation was longer in those who received rocuronium compared to succinylcholine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An educational lecture along with a novel ED post-intubation clinical guideline improved rates and timing to analgesia and sedation. This provides a unique opportunity for emergency nurses to advocate for early analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:最近的文献表明,快速顺序插管后ED患者的疼痛管理和镇静操作不一致,这对患者的预后有负面影响。本研究的目的是比较急诊科药房实践改善干预前后插管后镇痛和镇静的比率和时间。方法:我们对18个月插管的成人ED患者进行了回顾性研究。主要研究终点是实施插管后指南和教育前后插管后镇痛镇静给药的频率。次要终点包括麻痹给药后镇痛和镇静药物的时间,麻痹药物(琥珀胆碱和罗库溴铵)的比较,ED的住院时间。结果:干预前插管后镇痛和镇静的平均比例分别为58.6%和94.3%。麻痹给药后,镇痛时间为63分钟(0 ~ 288),镇静给药时间为47分钟(0 ~ 214)。在急诊科的平均住院时间为298分钟(范围12-3143分钟)。干预后,35例患者符合纳入标准,使用镇痛和镇静的平均比例分别为77.1%和91.4%。平均镇痛时间改善至22分钟(范围0-123),镇静时间改善至20分钟(范围0-284)。急诊科平均住院时间减少到204分钟(范围46-469分钟)。与使用麻醉剂的患者相比,使用罗库溴铵的患者到镇痛和镇静的平均时间比使用琥珀酰胆碱的患者长。讨论:一个教育讲座和一个新的ED插管后临床指南提高了镇痛和镇静的率和时间。这为急诊护士提供了一个独特的机会,提倡对机械通气患者进行早期镇痛和镇静。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Administration and Timing of Post Intubation Analgesia and Sedation in the Emergency Department.

Introduction: Recent literature suggests pain management and sedation in ED patients after rapid sequence intubation are done inconsistently, which impacts patient outcomes negatively. The purpose of this study is to compare rates and timing of post-intubation analgesia and sedation before and after an ED pharmacy practice improvement intervention.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult ED patients intubated over an 18-month period. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration before and after implementation of the post-intubation guideline and education. Secondary endpoints included time to analgesia and sedation medication after paralytic administration, comparison between paralytic drugs utilized (succinylcholine and rocuronium), and ED length of stay.

Results: Prior to intervention, the mean percentage of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration was 58.6% and 94.3%, respectively. After paralytic administration, the time to dose of analgesia was 63 minutes (range 0-288) and 47 minutes for sedation medication (range 0-214). The mean length of stay in the emergency department was 298 minutes (range 12-3143). Following the intervention, 35 patients met inclusion criteria, and the mean percentage of analgesia and sedation administration was 77.1% and 91.4%, respectively. The mean time to analgesia administration improved to 22 minutes (range 0-123), and sedation improved to 20 minutes (range 0-284). The mean emergency department length of stay decreased to 204 minutes (range 46-469). When comparing paralytic used, mean time to analgesia and sedation was longer in those who received rocuronium compared to succinylcholine.

Discussion: An educational lecture along with a novel ED post-intubation clinical guideline improved rates and timing to analgesia and sedation. This provides a unique opportunity for emergency nurses to advocate for early analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse in Triage of Primary Care Emergency Departments. Interpreter Modalities and Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits in Limited English Proficiency Patients. Continuous Improvement Decreases Emergency Department Patients Leaving Before Treatment Complete Rates. CPR in Traumatic Arrest: Time to Question our Practice. Exploring the Factors Promoting Nurses' Stages of Change for Patient Evacuation in Disasters: A Directed Content Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1