在一项全国性队列研究中,根据配药处方序列抗抑郁药可接受性的性别差异。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.4088/JCP.23m15128
Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Nicolas Hoertel, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne
{"title":"在一项全国性队列研究中,根据配药处方序列抗抑郁药可接受性的性别差异。","authors":"Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Nicolas Hoertel, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is higher in women than in men. In contrast, there is still no clear consensus on the existence of sex-related differences in the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments for these disorders. This real-world study used filled prescription sequences to compare antidepressant medications between women and men at a medication level according to their acceptability (ie, combination of efficacy and tolerability).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> In a nationwide cohort from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users for any condition in 2011. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio over the 6- month period following the introduction of the first-line treatment. Continuation was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change was defined as at least one filled prescription of another antidepressant, an antipsychotic medication, or a mood stabilizer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, after the first prescription of an antidepressant, the continuation/ change ratio was slightly higher for women than men (aOR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.05-1.08]), with escitalopram ranking first in both. Sex-by-medication interactions were significant for paroxetine (0.91 [0.88-0.95]) and fluoxetine (1.19 [1.12-1.26]) only. Specifically, fluoxetine was significantly more acceptable in female than in male participants (0.73 [0.70-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), whereas paroxetine was more acceptable in male than in female participants (0.75 [0.72-0.78] vs 0.68 [0.66-0.70]).</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These real-world data may help practitioners and policymakers prioritize choice of antidepressant medications in women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Antidepressant Acceptability According to Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Nicolas Hoertel, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.23m15128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is higher in women than in men. In contrast, there is still no clear consensus on the existence of sex-related differences in the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments for these disorders. This real-world study used filled prescription sequences to compare antidepressant medications between women and men at a medication level according to their acceptability (ie, combination of efficacy and tolerability).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> In a nationwide cohort from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users for any condition in 2011. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio over the 6- month period following the introduction of the first-line treatment. Continuation was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change was defined as at least one filled prescription of another antidepressant, an antipsychotic medication, or a mood stabilizer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, after the first prescription of an antidepressant, the continuation/ change ratio was slightly higher for women than men (aOR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.05-1.08]), with escitalopram ranking first in both. Sex-by-medication interactions were significant for paroxetine (0.91 [0.88-0.95]) and fluoxetine (1.19 [1.12-1.26]) only. Specifically, fluoxetine was significantly more acceptable in female than in male participants (0.73 [0.70-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), whereas paroxetine was more acceptable in male than in female participants (0.75 [0.72-0.78] vs 0.68 [0.66-0.70]).</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These real-world data may help practitioners and policymakers prioritize choice of antidepressant medications in women and men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"85 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:女性抑郁和焦虑障碍的患病率高于男性。相比之下,对于抗抑郁药物治疗这些疾病的有效性是否存在与性别相关的差异,目前还没有明确的共识。这项现实世界的研究使用处方序列来比较女性和男性在药物水平上的抗抑郁药物,根据他们的可接受性(即疗效和耐受性的结合)。方法:在法国国家健康数据系统(SNDS)的全国队列中,2011年有120万人被确定为任何疾病的新抗抑郁药使用者。结果是临床可接受性,通过引入一线治疗后6个月的持续/改变比率来衡量。继续治疗定义为至少2次相同治疗的再补。改变被定义为至少服用一种抗抑郁药、抗精神病药或情绪稳定剂。通过多变量二元logistic回归计算校正优势比(aORs)。结果:总体而言,在首次服用抗抑郁药后,女性的持续/改变比略高于男性(aOR [95% CI], 1.06[1.05-1.08]),艾司西酞普兰在两者中均排名第一。仅帕罗西汀(0.91[0.88-0.95])和氟西汀(1.19[1.12-1.26])的性别-药物相互作用显著。具体来说,氟西汀在女性中的可接受度明显高于男性(0.73 [0.70-0.75]vs 0.63[0.60-0.67]),而帕罗西汀在男性中的可接受度高于女性(0.75 [0.72-0.78]vs 0.68[0.66-0.70])。结论:这些真实世界的数据可以帮助从业者和决策者优先选择女性和男性的抗抑郁药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Differences in Antidepressant Acceptability According to Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Objective: The prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is higher in women than in men. In contrast, there is still no clear consensus on the existence of sex-related differences in the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments for these disorders. This real-world study used filled prescription sequences to compare antidepressant medications between women and men at a medication level according to their acceptability (ie, combination of efficacy and tolerability).

Methods: In a nationwide cohort from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users for any condition in 2011. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio over the 6- month period following the introduction of the first-line treatment. Continuation was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change was defined as at least one filled prescription of another antidepressant, an antipsychotic medication, or a mood stabilizer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.

Results: Overall, after the first prescription of an antidepressant, the continuation/ change ratio was slightly higher for women than men (aOR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.05-1.08]), with escitalopram ranking first in both. Sex-by-medication interactions were significant for paroxetine (0.91 [0.88-0.95]) and fluoxetine (1.19 [1.12-1.26]) only. Specifically, fluoxetine was significantly more acceptable in female than in male participants (0.73 [0.70-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), whereas paroxetine was more acceptable in male than in female participants (0.75 [0.72-0.78] vs 0.68 [0.66-0.70]).

Conclusion: These real-world data may help practitioners and policymakers prioritize choice of antidepressant medications in women and men.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Target Trial Emulation: A Concept Simply Explained. Correction. Ketamine vs Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Do We Need More Data? Psychological Support Approaches in Psychedelic Therapy: Results From a Survey of Psychedelic Practitioners. The Need for Guidance on Ketamine/Esketamine Use in Real-World Clinical Settings. Association Between Suicidal Behaviors and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on the STOP-Bang Questionnaire: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1