住院戒酒和戒毒:病人与工作人员关系的定性研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00523-0
Joanne Neale, Beth Cairns, Kevin Gardiner, Wulf Livingston, Trevor McCarthy, Andrew Perkins
{"title":"住院戒酒和戒毒:病人与工作人员关系的定性研究。","authors":"Joanne Neale, Beth Cairns, Kevin Gardiner, Wulf Livingston, Trevor McCarthy, Andrew Perkins","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00523-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapeutic alliance is an important predictor of treatment outcomes but people who use alcohol and other drugs report mixed views of treatment providers. We analysed patients' accounts of inpatient detoxification staff to ascertain whether, and if so how, relationships with them, and thus the therapeutic alliance, might be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (in 2022/2023) with 20 people (14 males; 6 females) who had just completed inpatient detoxification in sixteen different facilities. Interviews were part of a larger longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an initiative to increase inpatient detoxification capacity across England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients described how treatment was delivered by professionals with diverse roles. They rated staff highly and appreciated their personal qualities; the standard of medical care and non-medical services they provided; their willingness to provide privacy, freedom and choice; the support given at key points in the treatment journey; and the positive impact staff relationships had on their substance use and lives more generally. Criticisms of staff were infrequent, mostly related to specific individuals or events, and potentially more common when detoxification occurred within general hospitals rather than within specialist services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' accounts of staff in this study were more positive than documented in previous literature. However, the characteristics that patients appreciated (and disliked) were consistent with earlier research. There was scope to improve in some services and patient groups not interviewed may have held more negative views of staff. Overall, the holistic and patient-centred approach that staff adopted, and patients valued, appears to contribute to a good therapeutic alliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient detoxification for alcohol and other drug use: qualitative study of patients' accounts of their relationships with staff.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Neale, Beth Cairns, Kevin Gardiner, Wulf Livingston, Trevor McCarthy, Andrew Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-024-00523-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapeutic alliance is an important predictor of treatment outcomes but people who use alcohol and other drugs report mixed views of treatment providers. We analysed patients' accounts of inpatient detoxification staff to ascertain whether, and if so how, relationships with them, and thus the therapeutic alliance, might be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (in 2022/2023) with 20 people (14 males; 6 females) who had just completed inpatient detoxification in sixteen different facilities. Interviews were part of a larger longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an initiative to increase inpatient detoxification capacity across England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients described how treatment was delivered by professionals with diverse roles. They rated staff highly and appreciated their personal qualities; the standard of medical care and non-medical services they provided; their willingness to provide privacy, freedom and choice; the support given at key points in the treatment journey; and the positive impact staff relationships had on their substance use and lives more generally. Criticisms of staff were infrequent, mostly related to specific individuals or events, and potentially more common when detoxification occurred within general hospitals rather than within specialist services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' accounts of staff in this study were more positive than documented in previous literature. However, the characteristics that patients appreciated (and disliked) were consistent with earlier research. There was scope to improve in some services and patient groups not interviewed may have held more negative views of staff. Overall, the holistic and patient-centred approach that staff adopted, and patients valued, appears to contribute to a good therapeutic alliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00523-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00523-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗联盟是治疗结果的重要预测因素,但使用酒精和其他药物的人报告治疗提供者的观点不一。我们分析了患者对住院戒毒人员的描述,以确定是否,如果是,如何与他们建立关系,从而改善治疗联盟。方法:采用半结构化定性访谈法(2022/2023年)对20人(男性14人;6名女性),她们刚刚在16个不同的机构完成了住院戒毒。访谈是一项更大的纵向定性评估的一部分,该评估旨在提高整个英格兰的住院戒毒能力。结果:患者描述了不同角色的专业人员如何提供治疗。他们高度评价员工,欣赏员工的个人素质;他们提供的医疗和非医疗服务的标准;他们愿意提供隐私、自由和选择;在治疗过程的关键阶段给予的支持;员工关系对他们的药物使用和生活产生了积极影响。对工作人员的批评并不多见,大多与具体的个人或事件有关,而在综合医院而不是专科医院进行戒毒时,批评可能更为常见。结论:在这项研究中,患者对医护人员的描述比以往文献中记载的更为积极。然而,患者欣赏(和不喜欢)的特征与早期的研究一致。一些服务仍有改进的余地,未接受采访的患者群体可能对工作人员持更负面的看法。总的来说,工作人员采用的整体和以患者为中心的方法,以及患者的重视,似乎有助于良好的治疗联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inpatient detoxification for alcohol and other drug use: qualitative study of patients' accounts of their relationships with staff.

Background: The therapeutic alliance is an important predictor of treatment outcomes but people who use alcohol and other drugs report mixed views of treatment providers. We analysed patients' accounts of inpatient detoxification staff to ascertain whether, and if so how, relationships with them, and thus the therapeutic alliance, might be improved.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (in 2022/2023) with 20 people (14 males; 6 females) who had just completed inpatient detoxification in sixteen different facilities. Interviews were part of a larger longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an initiative to increase inpatient detoxification capacity across England.

Results: Patients described how treatment was delivered by professionals with diverse roles. They rated staff highly and appreciated their personal qualities; the standard of medical care and non-medical services they provided; their willingness to provide privacy, freedom and choice; the support given at key points in the treatment journey; and the positive impact staff relationships had on their substance use and lives more generally. Criticisms of staff were infrequent, mostly related to specific individuals or events, and potentially more common when detoxification occurred within general hospitals rather than within specialist services.

Conclusions: Patients' accounts of staff in this study were more positive than documented in previous literature. However, the characteristics that patients appreciated (and disliked) were consistent with earlier research. There was scope to improve in some services and patient groups not interviewed may have held more negative views of staff. Overall, the holistic and patient-centred approach that staff adopted, and patients valued, appears to contribute to a good therapeutic alliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in treatment effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: a moderation analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Patient characteristics associated with their level of twelve-step attendance prior to entry into treatment for substance use disorders. A stakeholder-driven approach to designing a peer recovery coach role for implementation in community-oriented primary care teams in South Africa. Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder. Comparison of heroin and fentanyl use in US nationally representative surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1