夏威夷高中橄榄球运动员头盔冲击特性的位置差异。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0068.24
Kiera D Glodowski, Bret Freemyer, Jay L Myers, Jong Soo Lee, Steven P Broglio, Troy Furutani, Nathan Murata, Cris Stickley, Erik E Swartz
{"title":"夏威夷高中橄榄球运动员头盔冲击特性的位置差异。","authors":"Kiera D Glodowski, Bret Freemyer, Jay L Myers, Jong Soo Lee, Steven P Broglio, Troy Furutani, Nathan Murata, Cris Stickley, Erik E Swartz","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0068.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The importance of analyzing head impact exposure among football players is well established, yet few studies have explored the differences across position groups in high school athletes. Better understanding of these differences may provide optimized intervention strategies for coaches and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the difference of head impacts per exposure (Imp/E) and impact burden high school football player position groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>High school athletic fields during Fall sports seasons.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>200 football players from three high school varsity teams including 69 offensive/defensive linemen, 51 linebackers/running backs/tight ends and 80 cornerbacks/safeties/wide receivers (16.1±0.9yrs, 177.9±7.8cm, 86.4±22.7) categorized as linemen, backers, and skills players respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Imp/E across positions, teams, session type, and seasons. Cumulative head impact burden per location (front, top, right, left, back) across position groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in Imp/E were found between position groups (P<0.001), where the backers group, (3.77[95% CI: 3.146, 4.395]) experienced higher total Imp/E compared to linemen (1.47[ 95% CI: 0.983, 1.96]) and skill players (1.56[95% CI: 1.11, 2.01]). Total accumulated burden of head impacts was significant (F(2,194) = 4.938, P<0.008), with backers (4622.85g's [95% CI: 3077.43, 6168.27]) significantly (P=0.011) higher than linemen (2657.70g's [95% CI: 2045.61, 3269.19 ]) and skill players (2875.7g's [95% CI: 2216.38, 3535.01]) (P=0.022). Front location impact burden (F(2, 194) = 7.784, P<0.001) revealed backers (1606.24g's [95% CI: 977.89, 2234.58]) also significantly (P=0.008) higher than both linemen (768.24g's [95% CI: 433.84, 1102.64]) and skill players (567.75g's [95% CI: 360.71, 774.78]) (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linebackers, tight ends, and running backs experienced more Imp/E and higher cumulative burden than other positions, which highlights the potential influence of specific positional requirements during football participation. Coaches and healthcare providers should be aware that a position's role during play may directly relate to changes in head impact risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hawaiian High School Football Player Positional Differences in Helmet Impact Characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Kiera D Glodowski, Bret Freemyer, Jay L Myers, Jong Soo Lee, Steven P Broglio, Troy Furutani, Nathan Murata, Cris Stickley, Erik E Swartz\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0068.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The importance of analyzing head impact exposure among football players is well established, yet few studies have explored the differences across position groups in high school athletes. Better understanding of these differences may provide optimized intervention strategies for coaches and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the difference of head impacts per exposure (Imp/E) and impact burden high school football player position groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>High school athletic fields during Fall sports seasons.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>200 football players from three high school varsity teams including 69 offensive/defensive linemen, 51 linebackers/running backs/tight ends and 80 cornerbacks/safeties/wide receivers (16.1±0.9yrs, 177.9±7.8cm, 86.4±22.7) categorized as linemen, backers, and skills players respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Imp/E across positions, teams, session type, and seasons. Cumulative head impact burden per location (front, top, right, left, back) across position groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in Imp/E were found between position groups (P<0.001), where the backers group, (3.77[95% CI: 3.146, 4.395]) experienced higher total Imp/E compared to linemen (1.47[ 95% CI: 0.983, 1.96]) and skill players (1.56[95% CI: 1.11, 2.01]). Total accumulated burden of head impacts was significant (F(2,194) = 4.938, P<0.008), with backers (4622.85g's [95% CI: 3077.43, 6168.27]) significantly (P=0.011) higher than linemen (2657.70g's [95% CI: 2045.61, 3269.19 ]) and skill players (2875.7g's [95% CI: 2216.38, 3535.01]) (P=0.022). Front location impact burden (F(2, 194) = 7.784, P<0.001) revealed backers (1606.24g's [95% CI: 977.89, 2234.58]) also significantly (P=0.008) higher than both linemen (768.24g's [95% CI: 433.84, 1102.64]) and skill players (567.75g's [95% CI: 360.71, 774.78]) (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linebackers, tight ends, and running backs experienced more Imp/E and higher cumulative burden than other positions, which highlights the potential influence of specific positional requirements during football participation. Coaches and healthcare providers should be aware that a position's role during play may directly relate to changes in head impact risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0068.24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0068.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:分析足球运动员头部撞击暴露的重要性是众所周知的,但很少有研究探讨高中运动员不同位置组的差异。更好地了解这些差异可以为教练和医疗保健提供者提供优化的干预策略。目的:量化高中橄榄球运动员位置组每次暴露头部撞击量(Imp/E)和冲击负担的差异。设计:前瞻性观察。背景:秋季运动季节的高中运动场。患者和参与者:来自三个高中校队的200名橄榄球运动员,其中进攻/防守前锋69人,线卫/跑卫/近端锋51人,角卫/安全/外接80人(16.1±0.9岁,177.9±7.8厘米,86.4±22.7),分别分为线卫,后卫和技术运动员。主要结果度量:跨职位、团队、会话类型和赛季的Imp/E。每个位置(前、上、右、左、后)的累积头部冲击负荷。结果:不同位置组之间Imp/E存在显著差异(p)。结论:中后卫、近端锋和跑卫的Imp/E和累积负担高于其他位置,这突出了特定位置要求对足球参与的潜在影响。教练和医疗保健提供者应该意识到,一个位置在比赛中的作用可能直接关系到头部撞击风险的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hawaiian High School Football Player Positional Differences in Helmet Impact Characteristics.

Context: The importance of analyzing head impact exposure among football players is well established, yet few studies have explored the differences across position groups in high school athletes. Better understanding of these differences may provide optimized intervention strategies for coaches and healthcare providers.

Objective: To quantify the difference of head impacts per exposure (Imp/E) and impact burden high school football player position groups.

Design: Prospective observational.

Setting: High school athletic fields during Fall sports seasons.

Patients and participants: 200 football players from three high school varsity teams including 69 offensive/defensive linemen, 51 linebackers/running backs/tight ends and 80 cornerbacks/safeties/wide receivers (16.1±0.9yrs, 177.9±7.8cm, 86.4±22.7) categorized as linemen, backers, and skills players respectively.

Main outcome measures: Imp/E across positions, teams, session type, and seasons. Cumulative head impact burden per location (front, top, right, left, back) across position groups.

Results: Significant differences in Imp/E were found between position groups (P<0.001), where the backers group, (3.77[95% CI: 3.146, 4.395]) experienced higher total Imp/E compared to linemen (1.47[ 95% CI: 0.983, 1.96]) and skill players (1.56[95% CI: 1.11, 2.01]). Total accumulated burden of head impacts was significant (F(2,194) = 4.938, P<0.008), with backers (4622.85g's [95% CI: 3077.43, 6168.27]) significantly (P=0.011) higher than linemen (2657.70g's [95% CI: 2045.61, 3269.19 ]) and skill players (2875.7g's [95% CI: 2216.38, 3535.01]) (P=0.022). Front location impact burden (F(2, 194) = 7.784, P<0.001) revealed backers (1606.24g's [95% CI: 977.89, 2234.58]) also significantly (P=0.008) higher than both linemen (768.24g's [95% CI: 433.84, 1102.64]) and skill players (567.75g's [95% CI: 360.71, 774.78]) (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Linebackers, tight ends, and running backs experienced more Imp/E and higher cumulative burden than other positions, which highlights the potential influence of specific positional requirements during football participation. Coaches and healthcare providers should be aware that a position's role during play may directly relate to changes in head impact risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
The Running Readiness Scale and Injury in Collegiate Track & Field and Cross Country Athletes. Non-linear interactions of lower limb clinical measures associated with asymptomatic Achilles tendon pathology in ballet dancers. The Association between the Social Vulnerability Index and Access to California High School Athletic Trainers. Don't Sleep on Sleep: A Case Report from a Division I Heptathlete. Service Utilization and Value at an Athletic Training Student Run Clinic for University Employees and Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1