Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ching-Yang Wu, Howard Lim, Kei Muro, Lichao Xu, Manjiri Somashekhar, S P Sampige Prasannakumar Somashekhar, Xiaotao Zhang, Xiaoxia Qiu, Ying Fu, Mauro Pittiruti
{"title":"国际专家对癌症患者最佳中央血管通路装置的选择和管理达成共识。","authors":"Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ching-Yang Wu, Howard Lim, Kei Muro, Lichao Xu, Manjiri Somashekhar, S P Sampige Prasannakumar Somashekhar, Xiaotao Zhang, Xiaoxia Qiu, Ying Fu, Mauro Pittiruti","doi":"10.1177/11297298241300792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with cancer, the choice of an appropriate venous access device is crucial for effective treatment, minimizing complications, and reducing healthcare costs. Key management decisions, such as the timing of device removal post-therapy, can impact clinical outcomes. As current international guidelines lack specific directives for these issues, a global consensus of experts, representing different countries, was deemed appropriate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 11 experts from three continents, including oncologists and healthcare professionals, was chosen. After a comprehensive review of clinical trials and guidelines on central venous access devices (CVAD) in oncology published between January 2013 and December 2023, the panel developed and voted on specific recommendations for the selection and management of CVADs in patients with cancer, during a 2-day meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel reached consensus on 10 issues concerning (a) indications for a CVAD, (b) available options for CVADs, (c) role of the staff and patients in the choice of CVAD, (d) factors influencing the selection of a port over an external catheter, (e) logistical requirements for port and external catheter insertion, (f) stakeholders responsible for port and external catheter insertion, (g) factors determining the removal of a port after completing the definitive therapy, and (h) recommended frequency of flushing when the CVAD is not in use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the consensus may offer healthcare professionals a global view of some critical issues concerning CVADs for cancer therapy, helping to establish recommendations for local clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241300792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International experts consensus on optimal central vascular access device selection and management for patients with cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Jahanzeb, Ching-Yang Wu, Howard Lim, Kei Muro, Lichao Xu, Manjiri Somashekhar, S P Sampige Prasannakumar Somashekhar, Xiaotao Zhang, Xiaoxia Qiu, Ying Fu, Mauro Pittiruti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241300792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with cancer, the choice of an appropriate venous access device is crucial for effective treatment, minimizing complications, and reducing healthcare costs. Key management decisions, such as the timing of device removal post-therapy, can impact clinical outcomes. As current international guidelines lack specific directives for these issues, a global consensus of experts, representing different countries, was deemed appropriate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 11 experts from three continents, including oncologists and healthcare professionals, was chosen. After a comprehensive review of clinical trials and guidelines on central venous access devices (CVAD) in oncology published between January 2013 and December 2023, the panel developed and voted on specific recommendations for the selection and management of CVADs in patients with cancer, during a 2-day meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel reached consensus on 10 issues concerning (a) indications for a CVAD, (b) available options for CVADs, (c) role of the staff and patients in the choice of CVAD, (d) factors influencing the selection of a port over an external catheter, (e) logistical requirements for port and external catheter insertion, (f) stakeholders responsible for port and external catheter insertion, (g) factors determining the removal of a port after completing the definitive therapy, and (h) recommended frequency of flushing when the CVAD is not in use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the consensus may offer healthcare professionals a global view of some critical issues concerning CVADs for cancer therapy, helping to establish recommendations for local clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298241300792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241300792\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241300792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
International experts consensus on optimal central vascular access device selection and management for patients with cancer.
Background: In patients with cancer, the choice of an appropriate venous access device is crucial for effective treatment, minimizing complications, and reducing healthcare costs. Key management decisions, such as the timing of device removal post-therapy, can impact clinical outcomes. As current international guidelines lack specific directives for these issues, a global consensus of experts, representing different countries, was deemed appropriate.
Methods: A panel of 11 experts from three continents, including oncologists and healthcare professionals, was chosen. After a comprehensive review of clinical trials and guidelines on central venous access devices (CVAD) in oncology published between January 2013 and December 2023, the panel developed and voted on specific recommendations for the selection and management of CVADs in patients with cancer, during a 2-day meeting.
Results: The panel reached consensus on 10 issues concerning (a) indications for a CVAD, (b) available options for CVADs, (c) role of the staff and patients in the choice of CVAD, (d) factors influencing the selection of a port over an external catheter, (e) logistical requirements for port and external catheter insertion, (f) stakeholders responsible for port and external catheter insertion, (g) factors determining the removal of a port after completing the definitive therapy, and (h) recommended frequency of flushing when the CVAD is not in use.
Conclusions: The results of the consensus may offer healthcare professionals a global view of some critical issues concerning CVADs for cancer therapy, helping to establish recommendations for local clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.