超声心动图衍生的局部应变评估非罪魁祸首狭窄和预测急性STEMI收缩功能恢复。

Soufiane El Kadi, Thomas R Porter, Luuk H G A Hopman, Niels C Verouden, Albert C van Rossum, Ibrahim Danad, Otto Kamp
{"title":"超声心动图衍生的局部应变评估非罪魁祸首狭窄和预测急性STEMI收缩功能恢复。","authors":"Soufiane El Kadi, Thomas R Porter, Luuk H G A Hopman, Niels C Verouden, Albert C van Rossum, Ibrahim Danad, Otto Kamp","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03287-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare echocardiographic regional longitudinal strain with quantitative coronary angiography and assess temporal changes in regional strain in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Thirty-two patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease underwent coronary angiography with 3D quantification and baseline echocardiography. Regional longitudinal strain was measured as the average strain of three adjacent myocardial segments (RLS-3S) with the most impaired strain values. Forty-one stenosed vessels were identified (9 LAD [19%], 21 LCx [50%] and 11 RCA [31%]). RLS-3S did not correlate with diameter stenosis, area stenosis or minimal luminal diameter. Receiver operating curve analysis of RLS-3S for hemodynamic significant lesions (defined as positive fractional flow reserve or composite of ≥ 70% diameter stenosis and minimal luminal diameter < 1.2 mm) demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% CI 0.45-0.76) with an optimal cut-off value of < 9.8%. Sensitivity and specificity of RLS-3S was 86% (42-100) and 48% (31-66). RLS-3S < 9.8% at baseline in remote myocardium subtended by the stenosed coronary vessel predicted benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of regional functional recovery. RLS-3S does not correlate with individual coronary angiography measures and moderately predicts hemodynamically significant lesions. RLS-3S could be used to predict regional functional recovery after additional revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echocardiography-derived regional strain for assessment of non-culprit stenosis and prediction of systolic function recovery in acute STEMI.\",\"authors\":\"Soufiane El Kadi, Thomas R Porter, Luuk H G A Hopman, Niels C Verouden, Albert C van Rossum, Ibrahim Danad, Otto Kamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03287-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare echocardiographic regional longitudinal strain with quantitative coronary angiography and assess temporal changes in regional strain in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Thirty-two patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease underwent coronary angiography with 3D quantification and baseline echocardiography. Regional longitudinal strain was measured as the average strain of three adjacent myocardial segments (RLS-3S) with the most impaired strain values. Forty-one stenosed vessels were identified (9 LAD [19%], 21 LCx [50%] and 11 RCA [31%]). RLS-3S did not correlate with diameter stenosis, area stenosis or minimal luminal diameter. Receiver operating curve analysis of RLS-3S for hemodynamic significant lesions (defined as positive fractional flow reserve or composite of ≥ 70% diameter stenosis and minimal luminal diameter < 1.2 mm) demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% CI 0.45-0.76) with an optimal cut-off value of < 9.8%. Sensitivity and specificity of RLS-3S was 86% (42-100) and 48% (31-66). RLS-3S < 9.8% at baseline in remote myocardium subtended by the stenosed coronary vessel predicted benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of regional functional recovery. RLS-3S does not correlate with individual coronary angiography measures and moderately predicts hemodynamically significant lesions. RLS-3S could be used to predict regional functional recovery after additional revascularization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"63-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03287-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03287-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较超声心动图区域纵向应变与定量冠状动脉造影,评估STEMI合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者区域应变的时间变化。32例STEMI合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者行冠状动脉造影,三维量化和基线超声心动图。区域纵向应变测量为应变值受损最严重的相邻3个心肌节段(RLS-3S)的平均应变。发现41条狭窄血管(LAD 9条[19%],LCx 21条[50%],RCA 11条[31%])。RLS-3S与管径狭窄、面积狭窄或最小管径无关。RLS-3S对血流动力学显著病变(定义为正分数血流储备或≥70%管径狭窄和最小管径的组合)的受试者工作曲线分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Echocardiography-derived regional strain for assessment of non-culprit stenosis and prediction of systolic function recovery in acute STEMI.

To compare echocardiographic regional longitudinal strain with quantitative coronary angiography and assess temporal changes in regional strain in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Thirty-two patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease underwent coronary angiography with 3D quantification and baseline echocardiography. Regional longitudinal strain was measured as the average strain of three adjacent myocardial segments (RLS-3S) with the most impaired strain values. Forty-one stenosed vessels were identified (9 LAD [19%], 21 LCx [50%] and 11 RCA [31%]). RLS-3S did not correlate with diameter stenosis, area stenosis or minimal luminal diameter. Receiver operating curve analysis of RLS-3S for hemodynamic significant lesions (defined as positive fractional flow reserve or composite of ≥ 70% diameter stenosis and minimal luminal diameter < 1.2 mm) demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% CI 0.45-0.76) with an optimal cut-off value of < 9.8%. Sensitivity and specificity of RLS-3S was 86% (42-100) and 48% (31-66). RLS-3S < 9.8% at baseline in remote myocardium subtended by the stenosed coronary vessel predicted benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of regional functional recovery. RLS-3S does not correlate with individual coronary angiography measures and moderately predicts hemodynamically significant lesions. RLS-3S could be used to predict regional functional recovery after additional revascularization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1