低收入和中等收入国家的围产期姑息治疗:范围审查

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21037/apm-24-87
Sharla Rent, Daniela Titchiner, Erin Rholl, Allison Lyle, Ellen Diego, Krysten North, Sahar Rahiem, Avery Garmon, Raziya Gaffur, Aisa Shayo, Ana Lucia Diez Recinos, Monica Lemmon, Sharron L Docherty
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家的围产期姑息治疗:范围审查","authors":"Sharla Rent, Daniela Titchiner, Erin Rholl, Allison Lyle, Ellen Diego, Krysten North, Sahar Rahiem, Avery Garmon, Raziya Gaffur, Aisa Shayo, Ana Lucia Diez Recinos, Monica Lemmon, Sharron L Docherty","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>2.4 million neonatal deaths and 2.6 million stillbirths occur each year. Over 98% of perinatal loss occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the global burden of perinatal loss, access to relevant perinatal palliative and psychosocial care is poor and understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this review, we synthesize perinatal palliative care literature from low- and middle-income countries. We focus on the clinical practice of perinatal palliative care and educational models being used in resource-constrained settings. We used a systematic scoping review approach, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Global Health (embsco) databases were searched. There were no date or language restrictions placed during the search. Study selection was conducted using Covidence to facilitate a staged review process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,145 articles remained after removing duplicate studies. Following the three-staged review, 81 studies were included in our analysis. The largest portion of published perinatal palliative care literature focused on clinical care (n=44). Nine studies focused on provider training in perinatal palliative care and 28 studies addressed parent or family experience. Of the included studies, 84.9% had a first or last author from a low- or middle-income country and 91.8% included an author from the country of focus in the manuscript. The findings presented in this scoping review reveal that healthcare workers and families desire improved guidelines about perinatal palliative care that reflect the realities of local culture and resources. Additionally, providers need enhanced training in perinatal palliative care techniques and management approaches that can be applied in a range of clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Global perinatal palliative care strategies must encompass compassionate communication with families, psychosocial support after stillbirth or neonatal death, and emotional and mental health support for healthcare workers who provide perinatal palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"1420-1448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Sharla Rent, Daniela Titchiner, Erin Rholl, Allison Lyle, Ellen Diego, Krysten North, Sahar Rahiem, Avery Garmon, Raziya Gaffur, Aisa Shayo, Ana Lucia Diez Recinos, Monica Lemmon, Sharron L Docherty\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/apm-24-87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>2.4 million neonatal deaths and 2.6 million stillbirths occur each year. Over 98% of perinatal loss occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the global burden of perinatal loss, access to relevant perinatal palliative and psychosocial care is poor and understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this review, we synthesize perinatal palliative care literature from low- and middle-income countries. We focus on the clinical practice of perinatal palliative care and educational models being used in resource-constrained settings. We used a systematic scoping review approach, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Global Health (embsco) databases were searched. There were no date or language restrictions placed during the search. Study selection was conducted using Covidence to facilitate a staged review process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,145 articles remained after removing duplicate studies. Following the three-staged review, 81 studies were included in our analysis. The largest portion of published perinatal palliative care literature focused on clinical care (n=44). Nine studies focused on provider training in perinatal palliative care and 28 studies addressed parent or family experience. Of the included studies, 84.9% had a first or last author from a low- or middle-income country and 91.8% included an author from the country of focus in the manuscript. The findings presented in this scoping review reveal that healthcare workers and families desire improved guidelines about perinatal palliative care that reflect the realities of local culture and resources. Additionally, providers need enhanced training in perinatal palliative care techniques and management approaches that can be applied in a range of clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Global perinatal palliative care strategies must encompass compassionate communication with families, psychosocial support after stillbirth or neonatal death, and emotional and mental health support for healthcare workers who provide perinatal palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"1420-1448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-87\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-87","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每年发生240万新生儿死亡和260万死产。98%以上的围产期损失发生在低收入和中等收入国家。尽管围产期损失是全球负担,但相关的围产期姑息治疗和社会心理护理的可及性很差,且研究不足。方法:在这篇综述中,我们综合了来自低收入和中等收入国家的围产期姑息治疗文献。我们专注于临床实践围产期姑息治疗和教育模式正在使用的资源有限的设置。我们使用了系统的范围审查方法,遵循系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的元分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)清单。检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL和Global Health (embsco)数据库。搜索过程中没有日期或语言限制。研究选择使用covid进行,以促进分阶段审查过程。结果:剔除重复研究后,共保留10145篇文献。经过三个阶段的回顾,我们的分析纳入了81项研究。已发表的围产期姑息治疗文献中,大部分集中在临床护理方面(n=44)。9项研究侧重于围产期姑息治疗的提供者培训,28项研究涉及父母或家庭经验。在纳入的研究中,84.9%的第一或最后作者来自低收入或中等收入国家,91.8%的研究包括来自手稿重点国家的作者。在这个范围审查中提出的研究结果表明,卫生保健工作者和家庭希望改善围产期姑息治疗的指导方针,反映当地文化和资源的现实。此外,提供者需要加强围产期姑息治疗技术和管理方法的培训,这些技术和管理方法可以应用于一系列临床环境。结论:全球围产期姑息治疗策略必须包括与家庭进行富有同情心的沟通,死胎或新生儿死亡后的社会心理支持,以及为提供围产期姑息治疗的卫生保健工作者提供情感和心理健康支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perinatal palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Background: 2.4 million neonatal deaths and 2.6 million stillbirths occur each year. Over 98% of perinatal loss occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the global burden of perinatal loss, access to relevant perinatal palliative and psychosocial care is poor and understudied.

Methods: In this review, we synthesize perinatal palliative care literature from low- and middle-income countries. We focus on the clinical practice of perinatal palliative care and educational models being used in resource-constrained settings. We used a systematic scoping review approach, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Global Health (embsco) databases were searched. There were no date or language restrictions placed during the search. Study selection was conducted using Covidence to facilitate a staged review process.

Results: A total of 10,145 articles remained after removing duplicate studies. Following the three-staged review, 81 studies were included in our analysis. The largest portion of published perinatal palliative care literature focused on clinical care (n=44). Nine studies focused on provider training in perinatal palliative care and 28 studies addressed parent or family experience. Of the included studies, 84.9% had a first or last author from a low- or middle-income country and 91.8% included an author from the country of focus in the manuscript. The findings presented in this scoping review reveal that healthcare workers and families desire improved guidelines about perinatal palliative care that reflect the realities of local culture and resources. Additionally, providers need enhanced training in perinatal palliative care techniques and management approaches that can be applied in a range of clinical settings.

Conclusions: Global perinatal palliative care strategies must encompass compassionate communication with families, psychosocial support after stillbirth or neonatal death, and emotional and mental health support for healthcare workers who provide perinatal palliative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
The current landscape of oncologic emergencies: the role of radiotherapy. The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from hospital-based specialized palliative care teams in Japan. Childhood cancer in Bangladesh: a qualitative evaluation. Physical symptoms in prolonged grief disorder: a case report. Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for existential distress: practical considerations for therapeutic application-a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1