心脏手术中凝血酶原复合物或血浆输注后凝血酶的产生。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s11239-024-03061-3
Ian J Welsby, Darrell R Schroeder, Kamrouz Ghadimi, Gregory A Nuttall, Mark M Smith
{"title":"心脏手术中凝血酶原复合物或血浆输注后凝血酶的产生。","authors":"Ian J Welsby, Darrell R Schroeder, Kamrouz Ghadimi, Gregory A Nuttall, Mark M Smith","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-03061-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombin generation (TG) is reduced after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), contributing to coagulopathy and bleeding. Plasma transfusion or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) are commonly used to treat coagulopathic bleeding after CPB without knowledge of how each may restore TG. To determine the effect of PCC infusion on restoration of thrombin generation compared with plasma transfusion, we performed a laboratory-based secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery to assess efficacy and safety of 4 F-PCC versus plasma for treatment of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding after CPB. Participants were randomized to receive either PCC (15 IU/kg) or plasma (10-15 ml/kg) after separation from CPB. Participant blood samples were obtained at pre-specified serial timepoints, with laboratory assays for TG and factor levels subsequently performed. The primary outcome was change in thrombin generation (TG) parameters after each randomized treatment through postoperative day 5. Secondary outcomes included serially derived clotting factor levels. Of 100 randomized participants, 99 were included in this laboratory analysis (PCC group, N = 51; plasma group, N = 48). After treatment, participants in the PCC group compared with those in the plasma group showed higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, Median, Interquartile range, IQR: 688 [371-1069] vs. 1088 [550-1691] nM minutes, P = 0.01), a greater increase din ETP (P = 0.002) and peak TG (P = 0.01) in the timepoints between heparin reversal and after treatment administration. Both groups demonstrated similar values in all TG assays by postoperative day 1 (P > 0.05). The PCC group also demonstrated higher levels of proteins C, S, and Factors II, VII, IX and X, early after treatment (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Antithrombin levels were initially higher in the plasma group after treatment (Median, IQR: 66% [61-71%] vs. 56% [51-65%], P = 0.002) but differences did not persist beyond postoperative day 3. In this laboratory analysis from a recent randomized trial in adult cardiac surgery, PCC administration restored thrombin generation more rapidly than plasma in the early postoperative period without laboratory evidence of hypercoagulability. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02557672 [1].</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombin generation after prothrombin complex concentrate or plasma transfusion during cardiac surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Ian J Welsby, Darrell R Schroeder, Kamrouz Ghadimi, Gregory A Nuttall, Mark M Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-024-03061-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thrombin generation (TG) is reduced after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), contributing to coagulopathy and bleeding. Plasma transfusion or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) are commonly used to treat coagulopathic bleeding after CPB without knowledge of how each may restore TG. To determine the effect of PCC infusion on restoration of thrombin generation compared with plasma transfusion, we performed a laboratory-based secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery to assess efficacy and safety of 4 F-PCC versus plasma for treatment of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding after CPB. Participants were randomized to receive either PCC (15 IU/kg) or plasma (10-15 ml/kg) after separation from CPB. Participant blood samples were obtained at pre-specified serial timepoints, with laboratory assays for TG and factor levels subsequently performed. The primary outcome was change in thrombin generation (TG) parameters after each randomized treatment through postoperative day 5. Secondary outcomes included serially derived clotting factor levels. Of 100 randomized participants, 99 were included in this laboratory analysis (PCC group, N = 51; plasma group, N = 48). After treatment, participants in the PCC group compared with those in the plasma group showed higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, Median, Interquartile range, IQR: 688 [371-1069] vs. 1088 [550-1691] nM minutes, P = 0.01), a greater increase din ETP (P = 0.002) and peak TG (P = 0.01) in the timepoints between heparin reversal and after treatment administration. Both groups demonstrated similar values in all TG assays by postoperative day 1 (P > 0.05). The PCC group also demonstrated higher levels of proteins C, S, and Factors II, VII, IX and X, early after treatment (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Antithrombin levels were initially higher in the plasma group after treatment (Median, IQR: 66% [61-71%] vs. 56% [51-65%], P = 0.002) but differences did not persist beyond postoperative day 3. In this laboratory analysis from a recent randomized trial in adult cardiac surgery, PCC administration restored thrombin generation more rapidly than plasma in the early postoperative period without laboratory evidence of hypercoagulability. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02557672 [1].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-03061-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-03061-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用体外循环(CPB)的心脏手术后凝血酶生成(TG)减少,导致凝血功能障碍和出血。血浆输注或四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)通常用于治疗CPB后凝血性出血,但不知道它们如何恢复TG。为了确定输注PCC与血浆输注相比对恢复凝血酶生成的影响,我们对一项随机对照试验进行了基于实验室的二次分析,以评估4 F-PCC与血浆治疗CPB后围手术期凝血性出血的有效性和安全性。参与者在CPB分离后随机接受PCC (15 IU/kg)或血浆(10-15 ml/kg)。在预先指定的连续时间点获得参与者的血液样本,随后进行TG和因子水平的实验室分析。主要终点是术后第5天每次随机治疗后凝血酶生成(TG)参数的变化。次要结局包括连续导出的凝血因子水平。在100名随机受试者中,99名纳入本实验室分析(PCC组,N = 51;血浆组,N = 48)。治疗后,与血浆组相比,PCC组的参与者表现出更高的内源凝血酶电位(ETP,中位数,四分位数范围,IQR: 688[371-1069]对1088 [550-1691]nM分钟,P = 0.01),在肝素逆转和治疗后的时间点上,ETP (P = 0.002)和TG峰值(P = 0.01)的增加更大。术后第1天,两组TG指标相近(P < 0.05)。PCC组在治疗后早期也表现出较高的蛋白C、S和因子II、VII、IX和X水平(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thrombin generation after prothrombin complex concentrate or plasma transfusion during cardiac surgery.

Thrombin generation (TG) is reduced after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), contributing to coagulopathy and bleeding. Plasma transfusion or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) are commonly used to treat coagulopathic bleeding after CPB without knowledge of how each may restore TG. To determine the effect of PCC infusion on restoration of thrombin generation compared with plasma transfusion, we performed a laboratory-based secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery to assess efficacy and safety of 4 F-PCC versus plasma for treatment of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding after CPB. Participants were randomized to receive either PCC (15 IU/kg) or plasma (10-15 ml/kg) after separation from CPB. Participant blood samples were obtained at pre-specified serial timepoints, with laboratory assays for TG and factor levels subsequently performed. The primary outcome was change in thrombin generation (TG) parameters after each randomized treatment through postoperative day 5. Secondary outcomes included serially derived clotting factor levels. Of 100 randomized participants, 99 were included in this laboratory analysis (PCC group, N = 51; plasma group, N = 48). After treatment, participants in the PCC group compared with those in the plasma group showed higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, Median, Interquartile range, IQR: 688 [371-1069] vs. 1088 [550-1691] nM minutes, P = 0.01), a greater increase din ETP (P = 0.002) and peak TG (P = 0.01) in the timepoints between heparin reversal and after treatment administration. Both groups demonstrated similar values in all TG assays by postoperative day 1 (P > 0.05). The PCC group also demonstrated higher levels of proteins C, S, and Factors II, VII, IX and X, early after treatment (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Antithrombin levels were initially higher in the plasma group after treatment (Median, IQR: 66% [61-71%] vs. 56% [51-65%], P = 0.002) but differences did not persist beyond postoperative day 3. In this laboratory analysis from a recent randomized trial in adult cardiac surgery, PCC administration restored thrombin generation more rapidly than plasma in the early postoperative period without laboratory evidence of hypercoagulability. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02557672 [1].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the causal inference of inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic stroke: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Assessment of anticoagulant safety and coagulation analysis in mice using the VETSCAN® VSpro analyzer. Correction: Factor XIa inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for atherothrombosis. Evaluation of unfractionated heparin therapy for venous thromboembolism using adjusted body weight in elderly or higher weight patients. Letter by Pirera et al regarding the paper "Direct oral anticoagulants in embolic stroke of undetermined source: an updated meta-analysis" by Marinheiro and colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1