瞄准放射肿瘤学患者安全指标- PaSaGeRO研究的一部分系统文献综述的结果。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657
Andrea Baehr, Maximilian Grohmann, Eva Christalle, Felicitas Schwenzer, Isabelle Scholl
{"title":"瞄准放射肿瘤学患者安全指标- PaSaGeRO研究的一部分系统文献综述的结果。","authors":"Andrea Baehr, Maximilian Grohmann, Eva Christalle, Felicitas Schwenzer, Isabelle Scholl","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) allow the evaluation of safety levels in healthcare settings. Despite their use in various medical fields, a specific and comprehensive PSI catalogue for radiation oncology (RO) is lacking. The Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) study aims for the development of a specific PSI catalogue in radiation oncology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study is to identify, formulate, and categorize PSIs specific to RO to bridge existing gaps in comprehensive patient safety evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search in PubMed included studies from 1989 onwards, in English or German, focusing on safety and quality indicators in RO, patient safety measures, or risk analyses. Exclusions were non-transferable, country-specific measures, techniques exclusive to specific departments, and legally mandated procedures. Additional sources were identified through reference tracking and professional society websites. Two experts independently extracted PSIs from the included references.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 157 included publications and nine secondary sources, we identified and formulated 145 PSIs. These were categorized into patient-specific processes (82, 56%), quality and risk management (42, 28%), human resources (15, 10%), and institutional culture (13, 9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hereby developed PSIs provides a base for professionals to systematically evaluate and improve safety practices, addressing previously unmet needs in this field. By offering clear guidance on safety assessment, the catalogue has the potential to drive significant improvements in patient care and safety outcomes in RO. Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034690).</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"110657"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Baehr, Maximilian Grohmann, Eva Christalle, Felicitas Schwenzer, Isabelle Scholl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) allow the evaluation of safety levels in healthcare settings. Despite their use in various medical fields, a specific and comprehensive PSI catalogue for radiation oncology (RO) is lacking. The Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) study aims for the development of a specific PSI catalogue in radiation oncology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study is to identify, formulate, and categorize PSIs specific to RO to bridge existing gaps in comprehensive patient safety evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search in PubMed included studies from 1989 onwards, in English or German, focusing on safety and quality indicators in RO, patient safety measures, or risk analyses. Exclusions were non-transferable, country-specific measures, techniques exclusive to specific departments, and legally mandated procedures. Additional sources were identified through reference tracking and professional society websites. Two experts independently extracted PSIs from the included references.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 157 included publications and nine secondary sources, we identified and formulated 145 PSIs. These were categorized into patient-specific processes (82, 56%), quality and risk management (42, 28%), human resources (15, 10%), and institutional culture (13, 9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hereby developed PSIs provides a base for professionals to systematically evaluate and improve safety practices, addressing previously unmet needs in this field. By offering clear guidance on safety assessment, the catalogue has the potential to drive significant improvements in patient care and safety outcomes in RO. Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034690).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者安全指标(psi)允许评估医疗保健环境中的安全水平。尽管它们在各种医学领域中使用,但缺乏针对放射肿瘤学(RO)的具体和全面的PSI目录。德国放射肿瘤学中的患者安全(PaSaGeRO)研究旨在开发放射肿瘤学中特定的PSI目录。目的:作为PaSaGeRO研究的一部分,本系统文献综述的主要目的是识别、制定和分类针对RO的psi,以弥补综合患者安全性评估中的现有差距。方法:电子检索PubMed,包括1989年以来的英文或德文研究,重点是RO的安全和质量指标,患者安全措施或风险分析。排除是不可转让的、针对具体国家的措施、特定部门专有的技术和法律规定的程序。通过参考文献跟踪和专业协会网站确定了其他来源。两位专家分别从纳入的参考文献中提取了psi。结果:在纳入的157篇出版物和9个二手来源中,我们确定并制定了145个psi。这些因素被分类为患者特定流程(82,56%)、质量和风险管理(42,28%)、人力资源(15,10%)和机构文化(13.9%)。结论:本文开发的psi为专业人员系统评估和改进安全实践提供了基础,解决了该领域以前未满足的需求。通过提供关于安全评估的明确指导,该目录有可能推动RO患者护理和安全结果的重大改进。由德意志银行资助。在德国临床试验注册(DRKS00034690)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study.

Background: Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) allow the evaluation of safety levels in healthcare settings. Despite their use in various medical fields, a specific and comprehensive PSI catalogue for radiation oncology (RO) is lacking. The Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) study aims for the development of a specific PSI catalogue in radiation oncology.

Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study is to identify, formulate, and categorize PSIs specific to RO to bridge existing gaps in comprehensive patient safety evaluation.

Methods: An electronic search in PubMed included studies from 1989 onwards, in English or German, focusing on safety and quality indicators in RO, patient safety measures, or risk analyses. Exclusions were non-transferable, country-specific measures, techniques exclusive to specific departments, and legally mandated procedures. Additional sources were identified through reference tracking and professional society websites. Two experts independently extracted PSIs from the included references.

Results: Out of 157 included publications and nine secondary sources, we identified and formulated 145 PSIs. These were categorized into patient-specific processes (82, 56%), quality and risk management (42, 28%), human resources (15, 10%), and institutional culture (13, 9%).

Conclusion: The hereby developed PSIs provides a base for professionals to systematically evaluate and improve safety practices, addressing previously unmet needs in this field. By offering clear guidance on safety assessment, the catalogue has the potential to drive significant improvements in patient care and safety outcomes in RO. Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034690).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Deglutition preservation after swallowing (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT in head and neck cancers: definitive results of a multicenter prospective study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Association of the time of day of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab with tumor control in lung cancer. Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study. Randomized trials: When scientific rigor meets field reality. A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1