Jannik Leyendecker, Mark Mahan, Matthew C Findlay, Tobias Prasse, Malin Köster, Lena Rumswinkel, Tara Shenker, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow, Mark M Zaki, Sanjay Konakondla, Osama N Kashlan, Peter Derman, Albert Telfeian, Christoph P Hofstetter
{"title":"与其他脊柱手术技术相比,全内窥镜脊柱减压或椎间盘切除术在30天再入院率方面显示出优势:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Jannik Leyendecker, Mark Mahan, Matthew C Findlay, Tobias Prasse, Malin Köster, Lena Rumswinkel, Tara Shenker, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow, Mark M Zaki, Sanjay Konakondla, Osama N Kashlan, Peter Derman, Albert Telfeian, Christoph P Hofstetter","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and context: </strong>Unplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Here we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Our primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing noninstrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016 to 2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs. 4.4%, p <.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs. 4.5%, p<.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs. 1.1%, p=.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.57, p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and nonendoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to nonendoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-endoscopic spinal decompression or discectomy show benefits regarding 30-day readmission rates when compared to other spine surgery techniques: a propensity score matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jannik Leyendecker, Mark Mahan, Matthew C Findlay, Tobias Prasse, Malin Köster, Lena Rumswinkel, Tara Shenker, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow, Mark M Zaki, Sanjay Konakondla, Osama N Kashlan, Peter Derman, Albert Telfeian, Christoph P Hofstetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and context: </strong>Unplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Here we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Our primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing noninstrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016 to 2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs. 4.4%, p <.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs. 4.5%, p<.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs. 1.1%, p=.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.57, p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and nonendoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to nonendoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和背景:择期脊柱手术后30天内的意外再入院是衡量护理质量的关键指标,因为再入院往往预示着早期并发症或恢复不良。医院再入院减少计划(HRRP)和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)利用这一指标来评估医院和外科医生的表现。目的:在这里,我们旨在描述与传统脊柱手术相比,全内窥镜脊柱手术(FESS)的护理质量指标。设计:本研究为回顾性多中心分析,比较倾向匹配队列的结果。患者样本:该研究包括2014年至2023年间手术的908例FESS患者和73,906例非FESS患者的匹配队列。结局指标:我们的主要结局指标是术后30天住院再入院和翻修手术。此外,还包括人口统计数据、住院情况、手术细节和合并症。方法:收集6所参与机构的资料。在2016-2023年期间,年龄大于18岁的患者因退行性腰椎病变接受了非固定FESS脊柱手术。在ACS-NSQIP数据库(2015-2019)中确定了一个匹配的非fess队列。倾向得分匹配用于比较队列。结果:配对前,FESS队列的30天再入院率显著降低(1.1%对4.4%,p < 0.001),配对后保持一致(1.1%对4.5%,p < 0.001)。30天手术翻修率在队列之间相似(1.0%对1.1%,p = 0.63)。多因素分析显示FESS与减少30天再入院之间存在显著相关性(优势比[OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 ~ 0.57, p < 0.001)。结论:本研究首次在一个大型、匹配的多中心队列中比较FESS和非内镜手术30天再入院率。与非内镜入路相比,FESS显著减少了术后住院时间和30天再入院率,强调了门诊FESS的安全性和有效性。未来的研究需要明确FESS在更复杂的脊柱手术中的作用。
Full-endoscopic spinal decompression or discectomy show benefits regarding 30-day readmission rates when compared to other spine surgery techniques: a propensity score matched analysis.
Background and context: Unplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance.
Purpose: Here we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery.
Design: The study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts.
Patient sample: The study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients.
Outcome measures: Our primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included.
Methods: Data were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing noninstrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016 to 2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts.
Results: Before matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs. 4.4%, p <.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs. 4.5%, p<.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs. 1.1%, p=.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.57, p<.001).
Conclusion: This study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and nonendoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to nonendoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.