{"title":"保留胃十二指肠动脉的两种不同类型动脉胆道吻合术的比较:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Hao Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Can Qi, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang, Jiwei Qin, Ruipeng Song, Jizhou Wang, Dalong Yin, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang, Björn Nashan","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Demographics did not differ between both groups (<em>P</em> > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; <em>P</em> < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; <em>P</em> = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, <em>P</em> < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, <em>P</em> = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; <em>P</em> = .049).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"56 10","pages":"Pages 2183-2190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 2 Different Types of Arterial and Biliary Anastomoses While Preserving the Gastroduodenal Artery: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Hao Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Can Qi, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang, Jiwei Qin, Ruipeng Song, Jizhou Wang, Dalong Yin, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang, Björn Nashan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Demographics did not differ between both groups (<em>P</em> > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; <em>P</em> < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; <em>P</em> = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, <em>P</em> < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, <em>P</em> = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; <em>P</em> = .049).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2183-2190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005797\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨原位肝移植(OLT)中保留胃十二指肠动脉(GDA)的两种不同的动脉重建方法。方法:采用回顾性队列研究。分析2018年5月至2023年8月40对肾移植供体和受体的临床病理资料。所有受术者在肝动脉重建过程中均保留GDA,根据吻合位置的不同分为2组,端侧组(E-S组,n = 17,肝总动脉与胃十二指肠动脉之间的分支贴片)和端端组(E-E组,n = 23,肝总动脉与肝原动脉之间的分支贴片)。结果:两组人口统计学差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。E-S组大鼠热缺血时间(WIT)数值上更长(403.3±103.3 vs 195.2±35.8 s);P < 0.001),但E-S组的冷缺血时间(CIT)较E-S组短(279.2±74.7 vs 325.2±15.1 min);P = .023)。E-S组动脉重建时间和手术时间较E-S组短(21.0±3.6 min vs 51.0±9.1 min, P < 0.001;326.0±103.4 vs 422.7±24.6 min, P = .001)。E-S组耐药指数(RI)较低(0.5±0.3 vs 0.6±0.1);P = .049)。结论:两组动脉及胆道并发症无明显差异。GDA保存符合解剖和生理要求。E-S在肝动脉重建及RI时间上优于E-E。
Comparison of 2 Different Types of Arterial and Biliary Anastomoses While Preserving the Gastroduodenal Artery: A Retrospective Study
Objective
Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).
Results
Demographics did not differ between both groups (P > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; P < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; P = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, P < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, P = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; P = .049).
Conclusion
Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.