影像引导宫颈近距离放疗实践模式:2023/2024年美国近距离放疗学会调查

Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.013
Elizabeth A Kidd, Santino S Butler, Ulysses Gardner, Akila N Viswanathan
{"title":"影像引导宫颈近距离放疗实践模式:2023/2024年美国近距离放疗学会调查","authors":"Elizabeth A Kidd, Santino S Butler, Ulysses Gardner, Akila N Viswanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An update of the 2007 and 2014 surveys of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) will elucidate current practice patterns of cervical cancer brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 40-question survey was sent to all ABS members in June-July 2023 and February 2024; 167 responses were received, with 140 used for analysis. Results were compared to the 2014 survey using chi-squared testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2014, MRI use for treatment planning of the first brachytherapy fraction increased from 34% to 63% (p < 0.001), prescription to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) increased from 52% to 94% (p < 0.001), while Point A prescription decreased from 42% to 16% (p < 0.001). Additionally, procedural guidance with ultrasound significantly increased (79% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) along with the use of interstitial needles (always or nearly always, >80%) (29% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). MRI availability around the time of procedure was the largest challenge to incorporating MRI into brachytherapy treatment planning. Compared to those with MRI access reserved specifically for Radiation Oncology, respondents with shared-access or out-of-department MRI were less likely to obtain treatment planning MRIs for each brachytherapy fraction (22% vs. 75%; aOR 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For cervix cancer brachytherapy there has been significant increase in the use of MRI-based volumetric brachytherapy treatment planning, ultrasound guidance during procedures and the addition of interstitial needles. These advancements in practice patterns are congruent with published consensus guidelines and ongoing training initiatives. However, MRI access and lack of easy availability continue to be significant challenges for optimizing cervix brachytherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":"18-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image guided cervical brachytherapy practice patterns: 2023/2024 survey of the American brachytherapy society.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A Kidd, Santino S Butler, Ulysses Gardner, Akila N Viswanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An update of the 2007 and 2014 surveys of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) will elucidate current practice patterns of cervical cancer brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 40-question survey was sent to all ABS members in June-July 2023 and February 2024; 167 responses were received, with 140 used for analysis. Results were compared to the 2014 survey using chi-squared testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2014, MRI use for treatment planning of the first brachytherapy fraction increased from 34% to 63% (p < 0.001), prescription to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) increased from 52% to 94% (p < 0.001), while Point A prescription decreased from 42% to 16% (p < 0.001). Additionally, procedural guidance with ultrasound significantly increased (79% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) along with the use of interstitial needles (always or nearly always, >80%) (29% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). MRI availability around the time of procedure was the largest challenge to incorporating MRI into brachytherapy treatment planning. Compared to those with MRI access reserved specifically for Radiation Oncology, respondents with shared-access or out-of-department MRI were less likely to obtain treatment planning MRIs for each brachytherapy fraction (22% vs. 75%; aOR 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For cervix cancer brachytherapy there has been significant increase in the use of MRI-based volumetric brachytherapy treatment planning, ultrasound guidance during procedures and the addition of interstitial needles. These advancements in practice patterns are congruent with published consensus guidelines and ongoing training initiatives. However, MRI access and lack of easy availability continue to be significant challenges for optimizing cervix brachytherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国近距离放射治疗协会(ABS) 2007年和2014年调查的更新将阐明当前宫颈癌近距离放射治疗的实践模式。方法:于2023年6 - 7月和2024年2月向所有ABS会员发送40个问题的调查问卷;收到167份回复,其中140份用于分析。使用卡方检验将结果与2014年的调查结果进行比较。采用多变量logistic回归计算相关结果的校正优势比(aOR), 95%置信区间(CI)。结果:与2014年相比,MRI用于近距离治疗第一段的治疗计划从34%增加到63% (p < 0.001),处方到高危临床靶体积(HR-CTV)从52%增加到94% (p < 0.001),而A点处方从42%减少到16% (p < 0.001)。此外,超声的手术指导显著增加(79%对32%,p < 0.001),同时使用间质针(总是或几乎总是,bbb80 %)(29%对4%,p < 0.001)。手术前后MRI的可用性是将MRI纳入近距离治疗计划的最大挑战。与那些专门为放射肿瘤学保留MRI通道的患者相比,共享通道或科室外MRI的受访者更不可能获得每个近距离治疗部分的治疗计划MRI (22% vs. 75%;aOR 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30], p < 0.001)。结论:在宫颈癌近距离放射治疗中,基于mri的体积近距离放射治疗计划、术中超声引导和添加间质针的使用显著增加。这些实践模式的进步与已发表的一致指导方针和正在进行的培训计划是一致的。然而,MRI访问和缺乏容易获得仍然是优化宫颈近距离治疗的重大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Image guided cervical brachytherapy practice patterns: 2023/2024 survey of the American brachytherapy society.

Background: An update of the 2007 and 2014 surveys of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) will elucidate current practice patterns of cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Methods: A 40-question survey was sent to all ABS members in June-July 2023 and February 2024; 167 responses were received, with 140 used for analysis. Results were compared to the 2014 survey using chi-squared testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes of interest.

Results: Compared to 2014, MRI use for treatment planning of the first brachytherapy fraction increased from 34% to 63% (p < 0.001), prescription to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) increased from 52% to 94% (p < 0.001), while Point A prescription decreased from 42% to 16% (p < 0.001). Additionally, procedural guidance with ultrasound significantly increased (79% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) along with the use of interstitial needles (always or nearly always, >80%) (29% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). MRI availability around the time of procedure was the largest challenge to incorporating MRI into brachytherapy treatment planning. Compared to those with MRI access reserved specifically for Radiation Oncology, respondents with shared-access or out-of-department MRI were less likely to obtain treatment planning MRIs for each brachytherapy fraction (22% vs. 75%; aOR 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30], p < 0.001).

Conclusion: For cervix cancer brachytherapy there has been significant increase in the use of MRI-based volumetric brachytherapy treatment planning, ultrasound guidance during procedures and the addition of interstitial needles. These advancements in practice patterns are congruent with published consensus guidelines and ongoing training initiatives. However, MRI access and lack of easy availability continue to be significant challenges for optimizing cervix brachytherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From patient to pioneer: The inspiring journey of Dr. Brian Moran. Learning curve and proficiency assessment for gynecological brachytherapy amongst radiation oncology trainees in India: Results from a prospective study. A retrospective study on ruthenium-106 and strontium-90 eye-plaques treatment for retinoblastoma: 16-years clinical experience. The influence of time and implants in high-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Early outcomes following local salvage treatment with MRI-assisted low-dose rate brachytherapy (MARS) for MRI-visible postsurgical bed recurrences and focal intraprostatic recurrences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1