在马来西亚卫生部扩大获得钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的途径——一种多种HTA方法。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000643
Coleen Siew Bee Choo, Yee Vern Yong, Haarathi Chandriah, Nur Sufiza Ahmad
{"title":"在马来西亚卫生部扩大获得钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的途径——一种多种HTA方法。","authors":"Coleen Siew Bee Choo, Yee Vern Yong, Haarathi Chandriah, Nur Sufiza Ahmad","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia stakeholders seek primary care access to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). Addressing this required a complex decision, selecting among three SGLT2i for two different indications and two practice settings. The options include expanding the existing SGLT2i (empagliflozin) in the MOH Medicines Formulary to primary care and/or having dapagliflozin and/or luseogliflozin as alternatives. This study aimed to conduct a multiple health technology assessment (HTA) to determine the SGLT2i of choice for the MOH setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical benefits of SGLT2i were assessed through a systematic literature review and affordability was assessed through the development of three budget impact analysis models simulating seventy scenarios. Each model varied by prescribing indications, restrictions, and SGLT2i involved (M1: glycemic control, HbA1c between 6.5 percent and 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin-luseogliflozin; M2: cardiovascular benefits, HbA1c less than 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin; M3: a composite of M1 and M2). The outcome of the HTA was presented to the MOH decision-makers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in glycemic control between the SGLT2i, differences exist in cardiovascular benefits conferred. Despite having scenarios with lower net budget impact (NBI) in the M1, M2, and M3 models, decision-makers decided to expand empagliflozin use to primary care setting and add dapagliflozin for hospital-only setting for both indications [NBI of $4.38 mil] due to empagliflozin's advantage in reducing risk for cardiovascular death and prior experience of its use in MOH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multiple HTA approach guided the complex decision-making process by providing a holistic understanding of the decision's impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding access to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the Ministry of Health Malaysia - a multiple HTA approach.\",\"authors\":\"Coleen Siew Bee Choo, Yee Vern Yong, Haarathi Chandriah, Nur Sufiza Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324000643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia stakeholders seek primary care access to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). Addressing this required a complex decision, selecting among three SGLT2i for two different indications and two practice settings. The options include expanding the existing SGLT2i (empagliflozin) in the MOH Medicines Formulary to primary care and/or having dapagliflozin and/or luseogliflozin as alternatives. This study aimed to conduct a multiple health technology assessment (HTA) to determine the SGLT2i of choice for the MOH setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical benefits of SGLT2i were assessed through a systematic literature review and affordability was assessed through the development of three budget impact analysis models simulating seventy scenarios. Each model varied by prescribing indications, restrictions, and SGLT2i involved (M1: glycemic control, HbA1c between 6.5 percent and 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin-luseogliflozin; M2: cardiovascular benefits, HbA1c less than 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin; M3: a composite of M1 and M2). The outcome of the HTA was presented to the MOH decision-makers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in glycemic control between the SGLT2i, differences exist in cardiovascular benefits conferred. Despite having scenarios with lower net budget impact (NBI) in the M1, M2, and M3 models, decision-makers decided to expand empagliflozin use to primary care setting and add dapagliflozin for hospital-only setting for both indications [NBI of $4.38 mil] due to empagliflozin's advantage in reducing risk for cardiovascular death and prior experience of its use in MOH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multiple HTA approach guided the complex decision-making process by providing a holistic understanding of the decision's impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"e69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:马来西亚卫生部(MOH)利益相关者寻求初级保健获得钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)。解决这一问题需要一个复杂的决定,在三种SGLT2i中选择两种不同的适应症和两种实践环境。这些选择包括将卫生部药物处方集中现有的SGLT2i(恩格列净)扩大到初级保健和/或使用达格列净和/或鲁西格列净作为替代品。本研究旨在开展一项多重卫生技术评估(HTA),以确定卫生部设置的SGLT2i选择。方法:通过系统的文献综述来评估SGLT2i的临床效益,并通过模拟70种情况的三种预算影响分析模型来评估可负担性。每个模型因处方适应症、限制和SGLT2i所涉及的情况而有所不同(M1:血糖控制,HbA1c在6.5%到10%之间,恩格列净-达格列净-鲁西格列净;M2:心血管益处,HbA1c小于10%,恩格列净-达格列净;M3:由M1和M2组成)。HTA的结果已提交给卫生部决策者。结果:尽管SGLT2i组在血糖控制方面没有显著差异,但在心血管益处方面存在差异。尽管在M1、M2和M3模型中有较低的净预算影响(NBI),由于恩帕列净在降低心血管死亡风险方面的优势以及之前在卫生部的使用经验,决策者决定将恩帕列净扩大到初级保健机构,并将达格列净添加到仅用于医院的两种适应症中[NBI为438万美元]。结论:多重HTA方法通过提供对决策影响的整体理解来指导复杂的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expanding access to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the Ministry of Health Malaysia - a multiple HTA approach.

Objectives: Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia stakeholders seek primary care access to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). Addressing this required a complex decision, selecting among three SGLT2i for two different indications and two practice settings. The options include expanding the existing SGLT2i (empagliflozin) in the MOH Medicines Formulary to primary care and/or having dapagliflozin and/or luseogliflozin as alternatives. This study aimed to conduct a multiple health technology assessment (HTA) to determine the SGLT2i of choice for the MOH setting.

Methods: The clinical benefits of SGLT2i were assessed through a systematic literature review and affordability was assessed through the development of three budget impact analysis models simulating seventy scenarios. Each model varied by prescribing indications, restrictions, and SGLT2i involved (M1: glycemic control, HbA1c between 6.5 percent and 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin-luseogliflozin; M2: cardiovascular benefits, HbA1c less than 10 percent, empagliflozin-dapagliflozin; M3: a composite of M1 and M2). The outcome of the HTA was presented to the MOH decision-makers.

Results: Although there was no significant difference in glycemic control between the SGLT2i, differences exist in cardiovascular benefits conferred. Despite having scenarios with lower net budget impact (NBI) in the M1, M2, and M3 models, decision-makers decided to expand empagliflozin use to primary care setting and add dapagliflozin for hospital-only setting for both indications [NBI of $4.38 mil] due to empagliflozin's advantage in reducing risk for cardiovascular death and prior experience of its use in MOH.

Conclusions: The multiple HTA approach guided the complex decision-making process by providing a holistic understanding of the decision's impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
A MINIMUM DATASET FOR DESTINATION THERAPY WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: THE EVIDENCE THAT MATTERS TO DECISION MAKERS. A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression. Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil. Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force. How can actuarial science contribute to the field of health technology assessment? An interdisciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1