4D血流MRI在妊娠晚期胎儿心血管血流动力学研究中的可靠性。

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1148/ryct.240119
Erin K Englund, Takashi Fujiwara, Sarah A Smith, Mariana L Meyers, Richard M Friesen, Lorna P Browne, Alex J Barker
{"title":"4D血流MRI在妊娠晚期胎儿心血管血流动力学研究中的可靠性。","authors":"Erin K Englund, Takashi Fujiwara, Sarah A Smith, Mariana L Meyers, Richard M Friesen, Lorna P Browne, Alex J Barker","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To provide reference values for four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI in healthy fetuses and evaluate reliability of fetal 4D flow MRI hemodynamics in third trimester fetuses with normal cardiovascular development or suspected coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Materials and Methods Pregnant patients with healthy fetuses or fetuses with echocardiographic concern for CoA were prospectively recruited between May 2021 and October 2023. Doppler US-gated fetal 4D flow MRI was performed at 3 T. Repeated 4D flow (time permitting) and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) MRI data were acquired. Net flow was quantified, and the reliability of 4D flow measurement was evaluated by using precision across adjacent measurement planes, internal consistency based on conservation of mass, comparison of net flow from 4D flow MRI versus 2D PC MRI, and repeatability of 4D flow from separate acquisitions. Results Data were obtained in 34 pregnant participants (mean maternal age, 33 years ± 5 [SD]; mean gestational age, 35 weeks ± 2; <i>n</i> = 22 healthy fetuses and 12 fetuses with suspected CoA). Precision was high across all vascular segments (mean within-subject coefficient of variation = 7%). For mass conservation, there was an average difference of 19% ± 12 between ductus arteriosus plus isthmus flow versus descending aorta flow (<i>r</i> = 0.76). Net flow measured with 4D flow MRI correlated with that measured with 2D PC MRI (<i>r</i> = 0.51) but was underestimated relative to 2D PC MRI by approximately 34%. Hemodynamic parameters quantified from repeated 4D flow acquisitions had good agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 between test and retest data. Conclusion Hemodynamic measurements derived from fetal 4D flow MRI were reliable, showing good internal consistency, precision, and repeatability; however, as expected, 4D flow MRI underestimated absolute blood flow relative to 2D PC MRI. <b>Keywords:</b> Fetal MRI, Cardiac, Aorta, Hemodynamics/Flow Dynamics, Pulmonary Arteries <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"6 6","pages":"e240119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of 4D Flow MRI for Investigation of Fetal Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in the Third Trimester.\",\"authors\":\"Erin K Englund, Takashi Fujiwara, Sarah A Smith, Mariana L Meyers, Richard M Friesen, Lorna P Browne, Alex J Barker\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryct.240119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To provide reference values for four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI in healthy fetuses and evaluate reliability of fetal 4D flow MRI hemodynamics in third trimester fetuses with normal cardiovascular development or suspected coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Materials and Methods Pregnant patients with healthy fetuses or fetuses with echocardiographic concern for CoA were prospectively recruited between May 2021 and October 2023. Doppler US-gated fetal 4D flow MRI was performed at 3 T. Repeated 4D flow (time permitting) and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) MRI data were acquired. Net flow was quantified, and the reliability of 4D flow measurement was evaluated by using precision across adjacent measurement planes, internal consistency based on conservation of mass, comparison of net flow from 4D flow MRI versus 2D PC MRI, and repeatability of 4D flow from separate acquisitions. Results Data were obtained in 34 pregnant participants (mean maternal age, 33 years ± 5 [SD]; mean gestational age, 35 weeks ± 2; <i>n</i> = 22 healthy fetuses and 12 fetuses with suspected CoA). Precision was high across all vascular segments (mean within-subject coefficient of variation = 7%). For mass conservation, there was an average difference of 19% ± 12 between ductus arteriosus plus isthmus flow versus descending aorta flow (<i>r</i> = 0.76). Net flow measured with 4D flow MRI correlated with that measured with 2D PC MRI (<i>r</i> = 0.51) but was underestimated relative to 2D PC MRI by approximately 34%. Hemodynamic parameters quantified from repeated 4D flow acquisitions had good agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 between test and retest data. Conclusion Hemodynamic measurements derived from fetal 4D flow MRI were reliable, showing good internal consistency, precision, and repeatability; however, as expected, 4D flow MRI underestimated absolute blood flow relative to 2D PC MRI. <b>Keywords:</b> Fetal MRI, Cardiac, Aorta, Hemodynamics/Flow Dynamics, Pulmonary Arteries <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"e240119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为健康胎儿4D血流MRI提供参考价值,评价妊娠晚期心血管发育正常或疑似主动脉缩窄胎儿4D血流MRI血流动力学的可靠性。材料和方法在2021年5月至2023年10月期间前瞻性招募健康胎儿或超声心动图显示有CoA的孕妇。在3 t时进行多普勒us门控胎儿4D血流MRI(时间允许),获得重复的4D血流和二维(2D)相位对比(PC) MRI数据。对净流量进行量化,并通过相邻测量平面的精度、基于质量守恒的内部一致性、4D流量MRI与2D PC MRI的净流量比较以及单独采集的4D流量的可重复性来评估4D流量测量的可靠性。结果34名孕妇(平均产妇年龄33岁±5岁[SD];平均胎龄,35周±2周;n = 22例健康胎儿和12例疑似CoA胎儿)。所有血管段的精确度都很高(平均受试者内变异系数= 7%)。在质量守恒方面,动脉导管加峡部血流与降主动脉血流的平均差异为19%±12 (r = 0.76)。4D流量MRI测量的净流量与2D PC MRI测量的净流量相关(r = 0.51),但相对于2D PC MRI低估了约34%。从重复的4D血流采集中量化的血流动力学参数具有良好的一致性,测试和重新测试数据之间的类内相关系数为0.94。结论胎儿4D血流MRI血流动力学测量结果可靠,具有良好的内部一致性、准确性和可重复性;然而,正如预期的那样,相对于2D PC MRI, 4D血流MRI低估了绝对血流量。关键词:胎儿MRI,心脏,主动脉,血流动力学/血流动力学,肺动脉©rsna, 2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of 4D Flow MRI for Investigation of Fetal Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in the Third Trimester.

Purpose To provide reference values for four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI in healthy fetuses and evaluate reliability of fetal 4D flow MRI hemodynamics in third trimester fetuses with normal cardiovascular development or suspected coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Materials and Methods Pregnant patients with healthy fetuses or fetuses with echocardiographic concern for CoA were prospectively recruited between May 2021 and October 2023. Doppler US-gated fetal 4D flow MRI was performed at 3 T. Repeated 4D flow (time permitting) and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) MRI data were acquired. Net flow was quantified, and the reliability of 4D flow measurement was evaluated by using precision across adjacent measurement planes, internal consistency based on conservation of mass, comparison of net flow from 4D flow MRI versus 2D PC MRI, and repeatability of 4D flow from separate acquisitions. Results Data were obtained in 34 pregnant participants (mean maternal age, 33 years ± 5 [SD]; mean gestational age, 35 weeks ± 2; n = 22 healthy fetuses and 12 fetuses with suspected CoA). Precision was high across all vascular segments (mean within-subject coefficient of variation = 7%). For mass conservation, there was an average difference of 19% ± 12 between ductus arteriosus plus isthmus flow versus descending aorta flow (r = 0.76). Net flow measured with 4D flow MRI correlated with that measured with 2D PC MRI (r = 0.51) but was underestimated relative to 2D PC MRI by approximately 34%. Hemodynamic parameters quantified from repeated 4D flow acquisitions had good agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 between test and retest data. Conclusion Hemodynamic measurements derived from fetal 4D flow MRI were reliable, showing good internal consistency, precision, and repeatability; however, as expected, 4D flow MRI underestimated absolute blood flow relative to 2D PC MRI. Keywords: Fetal MRI, Cardiac, Aorta, Hemodynamics/Flow Dynamics, Pulmonary Arteries Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Cardiac MRI Evaluation of Determinants and Prognostic Implications of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Aortic Regurgitation. Early Identification of Myocardial Microstructural Alterations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with in Vivo Cardiac Diffusion-Tensor Imaging. Unusual Cause of Mid Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement at Cardiac MRI. Cardiovascular MRI-derived Right Atrial Strain for Improved Risk Stratification in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis. Exogenous Lipoid Pneumonia after Long-Term Nasal Petroleum Jelly Application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1