Kahook双刀阴道切开术与超声乳化术相比较:系统综述和meta分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522
Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby
{"title":"Kahook双刀阴道切开术与超声乳化术相比较:系统综述和meta分析。","authors":"Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"232-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Versus iStent Implantation Combined With Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"232-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实践:在这项荟萃分析中,与iStent/iStent注射植入联合超声乳化术相比,Kahook双刀阴道切开术的手术成功率更高。与支架组相比,KDB角切开术在6个月时显示更好的IOP降低。目的:比较超声乳化术联合Kahook双刀(KDB)骨切开术(phaco-KDB)或小梁微旁路支架(iStent和iStent注射)植入术(phaco-Stent)的效果。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library自成立至2024年4月的文献。随机临床试验和观察性研究比较了KDB阴道切开术与第一代或第二代iStent联合超声乳化术。主要观察指标为手术成功率、平均眼压变化、用药次数、并发症发生率。平均差异(MD)和合并优势比(OR)分别用于分析连续和二元结果。结果:纳入14项研究,共1959只眼(958只phaco-KDB, 1000只phaco-Stent,包括753只phaco-iStent和207只phaco-iStent注射)。综合研究结果显示,phaco-KDB组的手术成功率明显高于phaco-Stent组(OR: 0.68;95% CI:0.50 ~ 0.92;P = 0.01;I2=40%),并且在第6个月时,与phaco-Stent组相比,phaco-KDB组IOP降低幅度更大(MD: 1.13 mmHg;95% CI: 0.43 ~ 1.83;P = 0.002;I2 = 51%)。到第12个月,两组患者的IOP降低程度相似。第12个月的亚组分析显示,与phaco-iStent组相比,phaco-KDB组IOP降低幅度更大(MD: 1.69 mmHg;95% CI:0.44 ~ 2.95;P = 0.008;I2 = 74%)。然而,与phaco-iStent注射组相比,IOP降低无显著差异(MD: -0.72 mmHg;95% CI: -3.69 ~ 2.24;P = 0.63;I2 = 64%)。两组间药物减量和不良事件发生率具有可比性。结论:与支架植入术相比,KDB阴道切开术联合超声乳化术可获得更好的手术成功率。与iStent相比,KDB角切开术在12个月时显示更好的IOP降低。然而,iStent注射显示与KDB相似的IOP降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Versus iStent Implantation Combined With Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Prcis: In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).

Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.

Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Analysis of Peripapillary Choroidal Microvascular Density in Normal Tension Glaucoma and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategies for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma. Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in the United States. Association Between Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Intraocular Pressure Based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey VIII. Association of Peripapillary Arterial Circle of Zinn-Haller With Glaucoma in Highly Myopic Eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1