Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby
{"title":"Kahook双刀阴道切开术与超声乳化术相比较:系统综述和meta分析。","authors":"Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"232-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Versus iStent Implantation Combined With Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Guedes, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Karina de Oliveira Caneca, Eduardo Henrique Cassins Aguiar, Lucas Neves de Oliveira, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Joel S Schuman, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"232-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Versus iStent Implantation Combined With Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Prcis: In this meta-analysis, Kahook dual blade (KDB) goniotomy achieved higher rates of surgical success compared with iStent/iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at month 6 compared with the stent group.
Objective: To compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either KDB goniotomy (phaco-KDB) or trabecular microbypass stent (iStent and iStent inject) implantation (phaco-Stent).
Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared KDB goniotomy to the first or second-generation iStent combined with phacoemulsification were included. The main outcome measures were surgical success, mean change in IOP and medication number, and complication rates. Mean differences (MDs) and pooled odds ratios were used to analyze continuous and binary outcomes, respectively.
Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total of 1959 eyes (958 phaco-KDB, and 1000 phaco-Stent including 753 phaco-iStent and 207 phaco-iStent inject). The combined findings showed significantly higher rates of surgical success in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 40%), and greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-Stent group at month 6 (MD: 1.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 51%). By month 12, both groups demonstrated similar IOP reduction. Subgroup analysis at month 12 showed greater IOP reduction in the phaco-KDB group versus the phaco-iStent group (MD: 1.69 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.95; P = 0.008; I2 = 74%). However, compared with the phaco-iStent inject group, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction (MD: -0.72 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to 2.24; P = 0.63; I2 = 64%). Medication reduction and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between groups.
Conclusion: KDB goniotomy may offer better surgical success compared with Stent implantation when used in combination with phacoemulsification. KDB goniotomy demonstrated better IOP reduction at month 12 compared with iStent. However, iStent inject showed a similar IOP reduction to KDB.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.