妇科癌症的再照射实践:来自西班牙全国调查的见解。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03804-x
Dina Najjari-Jamal, Angels Rovirosa, Marta Gimeno-Morales, Katarina Majercakova, Maria Sánchez, Sonia Garcia, Diana Guevara, Teresa Muñoz, Cristina De la Fuente, Soraya Micó, Milica Stefanovic, Raul Matute, Sofia Córdoba
{"title":"妇科癌症的再照射实践:来自西班牙全国调查的见解。","authors":"Dina Najjari-Jamal, Angels Rovirosa, Marta Gimeno-Morales, Katarina Majercakova, Maria Sánchez, Sonia Garcia, Diana Guevara, Teresa Muñoz, Cristina De la Fuente, Soraya Micó, Milica Stefanovic, Raul Matute, Sofia Córdoba","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03804-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the lack of standardisation in gynecological cancer reirradiation, the Gyneacologial Radiation Oncology (GINECOR) working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), works towards to inquire the current state of reirradiation practices among the radiation oncology departments in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online 37-question survey was sent to all GINECOR members, representing most Spanish centers. The survey addressed general aspects of reirradiation, including experience, reirradiation sites, and techniques used. It included seven clinical case scenarios on reirradiation, and a final section on technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 58 centers, 29 responded, with 51.7% performing ≥ 5 reirradiation cases annually. While most centers offer multiple techniques, only 16/29 have access to BT. For in-field local relapse with surgery contraindicated, 79.3% performed BT in endometrial cancer, but only 27.5% treated with BT in cervical cancer recurrence. In this case, 17.2% used SBRT. For endometrial and cervical cancer, 44.8% and 65.4% of centers prescribed doses based on organ-at-risk tolerance, respectively. For pelvic wall/parametrial in-field relapse, 46.4% of the centres reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and 32.1% with BT. In nodal reirradiation, SBRT was preferred by 90% of centers. Variability was observed in target volume definitions for EBRT and proton therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reirradiation for gynecological cancer remains unstandardized, presenting significant challenges in clinical practice. To improve reirradiation protocols in gynecological cancer, the GINECOR working group is currently conducting a systematic review and formulating Delphi recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reirradiation Practice in Gynecological Cancer: Insights from a National Survey in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Najjari-Jamal, Angels Rovirosa, Marta Gimeno-Morales, Katarina Majercakova, Maria Sánchez, Sonia Garcia, Diana Guevara, Teresa Muñoz, Cristina De la Fuente, Soraya Micó, Milica Stefanovic, Raul Matute, Sofia Córdoba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03804-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the lack of standardisation in gynecological cancer reirradiation, the Gyneacologial Radiation Oncology (GINECOR) working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), works towards to inquire the current state of reirradiation practices among the radiation oncology departments in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online 37-question survey was sent to all GINECOR members, representing most Spanish centers. The survey addressed general aspects of reirradiation, including experience, reirradiation sites, and techniques used. It included seven clinical case scenarios on reirradiation, and a final section on technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 58 centers, 29 responded, with 51.7% performing ≥ 5 reirradiation cases annually. While most centers offer multiple techniques, only 16/29 have access to BT. For in-field local relapse with surgery contraindicated, 79.3% performed BT in endometrial cancer, but only 27.5% treated with BT in cervical cancer recurrence. In this case, 17.2% used SBRT. For endometrial and cervical cancer, 44.8% and 65.4% of centers prescribed doses based on organ-at-risk tolerance, respectively. For pelvic wall/parametrial in-field relapse, 46.4% of the centres reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and 32.1% with BT. In nodal reirradiation, SBRT was preferred by 90% of centers. Variability was observed in target volume definitions for EBRT and proton therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reirradiation for gynecological cancer remains unstandardized, presenting significant challenges in clinical practice. To improve reirradiation protocols in gynecological cancer, the GINECOR working group is currently conducting a systematic review and formulating Delphi recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03804-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03804-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:鉴于妇科肿瘤再照射缺乏标准化,代表西班牙放射肿瘤学会(SEOR)的妇科放射肿瘤学(GINECOR)工作组致力于调查西班牙放射肿瘤学部门再照射实践的现状。方法:向代表大多数西班牙语中心的所有GINECOR成员发送37个问题的在线调查。调查涉及再辐照的一般方面,包括经验、再辐照地点和使用的技术。它包括七个关于再照射的临床案例,以及最后一节关于外射束放疗(EBRT)和近距离治疗(BT)治疗的技术方面。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。结果:在58个中心中,29个有反应,其中51.7%每年进行≥5次再照射。虽然大多数中心提供多种技术,但只有16/29的中心有机会获得BT。对于手术禁忌的现场局部复发,79.3%的子宫内膜癌患者接受了BT治疗,但只有27.5%的宫颈癌复发患者接受了BT治疗。在这种情况下,17.2%的人使用SBRT。对于子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌,分别有44.8%和65.4%的中心根据器官风险耐受性开出剂量。对于盆腔壁/参数场内复发,46.4%的中心接受立体定向体放疗(SBRT), 32.1%的中心接受BT。在淋巴结再放疗中,90%的中心首选SBRT。EBRT和质子治疗的靶体积定义存在差异。结论:妇科肿瘤再放射治疗仍不规范,在临床实践中面临重大挑战。为了改进妇科癌症的再照射方案,GINECOR工作组目前正在进行系统评价并制定德尔菲建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reirradiation Practice in Gynecological Cancer: Insights from a National Survey in Spain.

Purpose: Given the lack of standardisation in gynecological cancer reirradiation, the Gyneacologial Radiation Oncology (GINECOR) working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), works towards to inquire the current state of reirradiation practices among the radiation oncology departments in Spain.

Methods: An online 37-question survey was sent to all GINECOR members, representing most Spanish centers. The survey addressed general aspects of reirradiation, including experience, reirradiation sites, and techniques used. It included seven clinical case scenarios on reirradiation, and a final section on technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

Results: Out of 58 centers, 29 responded, with 51.7% performing ≥ 5 reirradiation cases annually. While most centers offer multiple techniques, only 16/29 have access to BT. For in-field local relapse with surgery contraindicated, 79.3% performed BT in endometrial cancer, but only 27.5% treated with BT in cervical cancer recurrence. In this case, 17.2% used SBRT. For endometrial and cervical cancer, 44.8% and 65.4% of centers prescribed doses based on organ-at-risk tolerance, respectively. For pelvic wall/parametrial in-field relapse, 46.4% of the centres reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and 32.1% with BT. In nodal reirradiation, SBRT was preferred by 90% of centers. Variability was observed in target volume definitions for EBRT and proton therapy.

Conclusions: Reirradiation for gynecological cancer remains unstandardized, presenting significant challenges in clinical practice. To improve reirradiation protocols in gynecological cancer, the GINECOR working group is currently conducting a systematic review and formulating Delphi recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
SABR tolerance after prostatectomy: pushing the boundaries of ultrahypofractionation. Azathioprine and risk of non-melanoma skin cancers in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis. PMN-MDSCs are responsible for immune suppression in anti-PD-1 treated TAP1 defective melanoma. Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. Evaluating the prognostic role of glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first line: a study by the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1