需要多少参与者?营养研究中样本量的计算策略。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.3148/cjdpr-2024-019
Jamie A Seabrook
{"title":"需要多少参与者?营养研究中样本量的计算策略。","authors":"Jamie A Seabrook","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sample size estimation is a critical aspect of nutrition research methodology, yet it remains frequently overlooked, leading to underpowered studies and potentially inaccurate conclusions. This review addresses this gap by providing comprehensive guidance on how to calculate sample size in nutrition research. Emphasizing the importance of an a priori sample size calculation, the review outlines the key considerations, including the desired levels of significance and power, effect size estimation, and standard deviation assessment. Formulas for determining sample size for various comparisons, including two proportions, two means, three or more groups, and unevenly sized groups, are provided, along with strategies for addressing loss to follow-up. Hypothetical examples illustrate these formulas' application across different research scenarios, highlighting their practical value in ensuring study robustness. Additionally, the review discusses common pitfalls in sample size estimation, such as misjudging effect size or standard deviation, and emphasizes the need for transparent reporting of sample size calculations to enable accurate interpretation of study findings. This article is a resource for nutrition researchers, offering guidance on conducting appropriate sample size calculations to bolster methodological rigor and study reliability. By embracing the principles outlined herein, researchers can elevate the quality of nutrition research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many Participants Are Needed? Strategies for Calculating Sample Size in Nutrition Research.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie A Seabrook\",\"doi\":\"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sample size estimation is a critical aspect of nutrition research methodology, yet it remains frequently overlooked, leading to underpowered studies and potentially inaccurate conclusions. This review addresses this gap by providing comprehensive guidance on how to calculate sample size in nutrition research. Emphasizing the importance of an a priori sample size calculation, the review outlines the key considerations, including the desired levels of significance and power, effect size estimation, and standard deviation assessment. Formulas for determining sample size for various comparisons, including two proportions, two means, three or more groups, and unevenly sized groups, are provided, along with strategies for addressing loss to follow-up. Hypothetical examples illustrate these formulas' application across different research scenarios, highlighting their practical value in ensuring study robustness. Additionally, the review discusses common pitfalls in sample size estimation, such as misjudging effect size or standard deviation, and emphasizes the need for transparent reporting of sample size calculations to enable accurate interpretation of study findings. This article is a resource for nutrition researchers, offering guidance on conducting appropriate sample size calculations to bolster methodological rigor and study reliability. By embracing the principles outlined herein, researchers can elevate the quality of nutrition research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

样本大小估计是营养研究方法的一个关键方面,但它经常被忽视,导致研究不足和可能不准确的结论。这篇综述通过提供如何在营养研究中计算样本量的全面指导来解决这一差距。该综述强调了先验样本量计算的重要性,概述了关键考虑因素,包括期望的显著性和功率水平、效应大小估计和标准偏差评估。提供了用于确定各种比较的样本量的公式,包括两个比例、两个平均值、三个或更多组和不均匀大小的组,以及解决随访损失的策略。假设的例子说明了这些公式在不同研究场景中的应用,突出了它们在确保研究稳健性方面的实用价值。此外,该综述讨论了样本量估计中的常见缺陷,例如误判效应大小或标准偏差,并强调需要透明报告样本量计算,以便准确解释研究结果。这篇文章是营养研究人员的资源,为进行适当的样本量计算提供指导,以加强方法的严谨性和研究的可靠性。通过接受这里概述的原则,研究人员可以提高营养研究的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Many Participants Are Needed? Strategies for Calculating Sample Size in Nutrition Research.

Sample size estimation is a critical aspect of nutrition research methodology, yet it remains frequently overlooked, leading to underpowered studies and potentially inaccurate conclusions. This review addresses this gap by providing comprehensive guidance on how to calculate sample size in nutrition research. Emphasizing the importance of an a priori sample size calculation, the review outlines the key considerations, including the desired levels of significance and power, effect size estimation, and standard deviation assessment. Formulas for determining sample size for various comparisons, including two proportions, two means, three or more groups, and unevenly sized groups, are provided, along with strategies for addressing loss to follow-up. Hypothetical examples illustrate these formulas' application across different research scenarios, highlighting their practical value in ensuring study robustness. Additionally, the review discusses common pitfalls in sample size estimation, such as misjudging effect size or standard deviation, and emphasizes the need for transparent reporting of sample size calculations to enable accurate interpretation of study findings. This article is a resource for nutrition researchers, offering guidance on conducting appropriate sample size calculations to bolster methodological rigor and study reliability. By embracing the principles outlined herein, researchers can elevate the quality of nutrition research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
期刊最新文献
Parent/Caregiver Perceptions of the Good Food for Learning Universal School Lunch Program in Canada. From Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion to Justice: Calling in for Collective Learning and Action on Racism in Dietetics. Exploring the Social Determinants of Health in Nutrition Care for South Asian Communities: A Narrative Review. Examination of the Feelings and Experiences of Postpartum Mothers Engaging with Social Media: A Qualitative Study. Identifying and Mapping Canadian Registered Dietitians' Perceptions and Knowledge of and Experiences with Weight-Related Evidence: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1