Jacques Lara-Reyna, Mert Karabacak, Raymond Wedderburn, Eric Legome, Konstantinos Margetis
{"title":"脑疝的中脑容量:手术外伤性脑损伤的容量分析。","authors":"Jacques Lara-Reyna, Mert Karabacak, Raymond Wedderburn, Eric Legome, Konstantinos Margetis","doi":"10.25259/SNI_389_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study primarily aimed to assess the volumetric attributes of the midbrain and perimesencephalic structures preoperatively and following surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with brain herniation secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patients based on radiological findings and clinical symptoms indicative of brain herniation. We performed semi-automated segmentation of the intracranial structures most relevant to trauma and of interest for the current study, such as hematoma, ventricles, midbrain, and perimesencephalic cisterns. Using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans, we measured and analyzed the volume of these structures. Patients were grouped based on their discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores: GCS 15 and non-GCS 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2018 to February 2020, we included 20 patients in the study. Our volumetric analysis revealed that preoperative midbrain volume (5.84 cc vs. 4.37 cc, <i>P</i> = 0.034) was a significant differentiator between GCS 15 and non-GCS 15 groups. Preoperative midbrain volume remained significant in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.280, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.126-5.929, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 3.204, 95% CI = 1.228-12.438, <i>P</i> = 0.038) even after adjusting for age, sex, and admission GCS score. We identified a cut-off point of 4.86 ccs in preoperative midbrain volume, which demonstrated a discriminatory performance of 0.788 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 80.0% accuracy, 77.8% sensitivity, and 81.8% specificity between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients presenting with lesser midbrain compression preoperatively tended to have improved clinical outcomes postsurgery. Thus, we propose that this preoperative midbrain volume cut-off point holds predictive value for clinical outcomes within our cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midbrain volume in brain herniation: A volumetric analysis in operative traumatic brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Jacques Lara-Reyna, Mert Karabacak, Raymond Wedderburn, Eric Legome, Konstantinos Margetis\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_389_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study primarily aimed to assess the volumetric attributes of the midbrain and perimesencephalic structures preoperatively and following surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with brain herniation secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patients based on radiological findings and clinical symptoms indicative of brain herniation. We performed semi-automated segmentation of the intracranial structures most relevant to trauma and of interest for the current study, such as hematoma, ventricles, midbrain, and perimesencephalic cisterns. Using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans, we measured and analyzed the volume of these structures. Patients were grouped based on their discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores: GCS 15 and non-GCS 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2018 to February 2020, we included 20 patients in the study. Our volumetric analysis revealed that preoperative midbrain volume (5.84 cc vs. 4.37 cc, <i>P</i> = 0.034) was a significant differentiator between GCS 15 and non-GCS 15 groups. Preoperative midbrain volume remained significant in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.280, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.126-5.929, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 3.204, 95% CI = 1.228-12.438, <i>P</i> = 0.038) even after adjusting for age, sex, and admission GCS score. We identified a cut-off point of 4.86 ccs in preoperative midbrain volume, which demonstrated a discriminatory performance of 0.788 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 80.0% accuracy, 77.8% sensitivity, and 81.8% specificity between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients presenting with lesser midbrain compression preoperatively tended to have improved clinical outcomes postsurgery. Thus, we propose that this preoperative midbrain volume cut-off point holds predictive value for clinical outcomes within our cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_389_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_389_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究主要旨在评估诊断为外伤性脑损伤(TBI)继发脑疝的患者术前和手术后的中脑和脑周围结构的体积属性。方法:我们根据影像学表现和临床症状对患者进行评估。我们对与创伤最相关的颅内结构进行了半自动分割,并对当前研究感兴趣,如血肿、脑室、中脑和脑周池。通过术前和术后的计算机断层扫描,我们测量并分析了这些结构的体积。患者根据出院格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分进行分组:GCS 15分和非GCS 15分。结果:2018年5月至2020年2月,我们纳入了20例患者。我们的体积分析显示,术前中脑容量(5.84 cc vs 4.37 cc, P = 0.034)是GCS 15组和非GCS 15组之间的显著差异。术前中脑容量在单因素分析(优势比[OR] = 2.280, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.126 ~ 5.929, P = 0.04)和多因素logistic回归分析(调整后OR = 3.204, 95% CI = 1.228 ~ 12.438, P = 0.038)中,即使在调整年龄、性别和入院GCS评分后仍具有显著性。我们确定了术前中脑容量的截断点为4.86 ccs,这表明两组在受试者工作特征曲线下的区分性能为0.788,准确率为80.0%,灵敏度为77.8%,特异性为81.8%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,术前中脑压迫较小的患者术后临床预后较好。因此,我们建议术前中脑容量临界值对我们队列的临床结果具有预测价值。
Midbrain volume in brain herniation: A volumetric analysis in operative traumatic brain injury.
Background: This study primarily aimed to assess the volumetric attributes of the midbrain and perimesencephalic structures preoperatively and following surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with brain herniation secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Methods: We evaluated patients based on radiological findings and clinical symptoms indicative of brain herniation. We performed semi-automated segmentation of the intracranial structures most relevant to trauma and of interest for the current study, such as hematoma, ventricles, midbrain, and perimesencephalic cisterns. Using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans, we measured and analyzed the volume of these structures. Patients were grouped based on their discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores: GCS 15 and non-GCS 15.
Results: From May 2018 to February 2020, we included 20 patients in the study. Our volumetric analysis revealed that preoperative midbrain volume (5.84 cc vs. 4.37 cc, P = 0.034) was a significant differentiator between GCS 15 and non-GCS 15 groups. Preoperative midbrain volume remained significant in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.280, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.126-5.929, P = 0.04) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 3.204, 95% CI = 1.228-12.438, P = 0.038) even after adjusting for age, sex, and admission GCS score. We identified a cut-off point of 4.86 ccs in preoperative midbrain volume, which demonstrated a discriminatory performance of 0.788 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 80.0% accuracy, 77.8% sensitivity, and 81.8% specificity between the two groups.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that patients presenting with lesser midbrain compression preoperatively tended to have improved clinical outcomes postsurgery. Thus, we propose that this preoperative midbrain volume cut-off point holds predictive value for clinical outcomes within our cohort.