多发性骨髓瘤随机对照试验中患者报告的结果域及其与生存结果的关联

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s00277-024-06129-5
Darshi Shah, Francesco Sparano, Catherine Luo, Daniela Krepper, Johannes M Giesinger, Thomas Baldi, Eilidh Duncan, Madeline Pe, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Fabio Efficace
{"title":"多发性骨髓瘤随机对照试验中患者报告的结果域及其与生存结果的关联","authors":"Darshi Shah, Francesco Sparano, Catherine Luo, Daniela Krepper, Johannes M Giesinger, Thomas Baldi, Eilidh Duncan, Madeline Pe, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Fabio Efficace","doi":"10.1007/s00277-024-06129-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial endpoints in multiple myeloma (MM) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet there is significant variability in their methodology and reporting. Our study aimed to (a) identify the most commonly pre-specified PRO domains in MM RCTs and those most responsive to modern therapies, and (b) examine the association between PROs and progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). We performed a systematic review of MM RCTs that used EORTC QLQ-C30 and published between 01/2014-06/2023. The association between PFS/OS and PRO was explored using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test. Thirty-five RCTs were identified, with PROs as secondary or exploratory endpoints in all studies. About one-third of RCTs (n=11, 31.4%) pre-specified at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain, with the most common domains being Global health status/Quality of life (GHS/QoL) (n = 10, 90.9%), Physical Functioning (n = 6, 54.5%), Fatigue (n = 6, 54.5%), and Pain (n = 6, 54.5%). A statistically significant and/or clinically meaningful difference in at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain between arms was seen in 23/35 trials (65.7%), with the most common domains showing improvement being GHS/QoL (12/23 trials), Pain (11/23 trials), Fatigue (9/23 trials), and Physical Functioning (9/23 trials). PRO was noted to be concordant with PFS in 19/33 (57.6%) trials (p = 0.398), and with OS in 22/31 (71%) trials (p = 0.018). Our study identified key PRO domains that can be potentially used as primary endpoint in MM RCTs. Additionally, significant association between PROs and OS highlight the importance of integrating PROs to better capture treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcome domains in multiple myeloma randomized controlled trials and association with survival outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Darshi Shah, Francesco Sparano, Catherine Luo, Daniela Krepper, Johannes M Giesinger, Thomas Baldi, Eilidh Duncan, Madeline Pe, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Fabio Efficace\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-024-06129-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial endpoints in multiple myeloma (MM) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet there is significant variability in their methodology and reporting. Our study aimed to (a) identify the most commonly pre-specified PRO domains in MM RCTs and those most responsive to modern therapies, and (b) examine the association between PROs and progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). We performed a systematic review of MM RCTs that used EORTC QLQ-C30 and published between 01/2014-06/2023. The association between PFS/OS and PRO was explored using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test. Thirty-five RCTs were identified, with PROs as secondary or exploratory endpoints in all studies. About one-third of RCTs (n=11, 31.4%) pre-specified at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain, with the most common domains being Global health status/Quality of life (GHS/QoL) (n = 10, 90.9%), Physical Functioning (n = 6, 54.5%), Fatigue (n = 6, 54.5%), and Pain (n = 6, 54.5%). A statistically significant and/or clinically meaningful difference in at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain between arms was seen in 23/35 trials (65.7%), with the most common domains showing improvement being GHS/QoL (12/23 trials), Pain (11/23 trials), Fatigue (9/23 trials), and Physical Functioning (9/23 trials). PRO was noted to be concordant with PFS in 19/33 (57.6%) trials (p = 0.398), and with OS in 22/31 (71%) trials (p = 0.018). Our study identified key PRO domains that can be potentially used as primary endpoint in MM RCTs. Additionally, significant association between PROs and OS highlight the importance of integrating PROs to better capture treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06129-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06129-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者报告的结果(PROs)是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)随机对照试验(rct)的关键终点,但其方法和报告存在显著差异。我们的研究旨在(a)确定MM随机对照试验中最常见的预先指定PRO结构域和对现代治疗最敏感的PRO结构域,以及(b)检查PRO与无进展生存期(PFS)/总生存期(OS)之间的关系。我们对2014年1月至2023年6月间发表的使用EORTC QLQ-C30的MM随机对照试验进行了系统回顾。采用Fisher精确检验或Pearson卡方检验探讨PFS/OS与PRO之间的关系。纳入35项随机对照试验,所有研究均以PROs作为次要终点或探索性终点。大约三分之一的rct (n=11, 31.4%)预先指定了至少一个EORTC QLQ-C30域,最常见的域是全球健康状态/生活质量(GHS/QoL) (n= 10, 90.9%)、身体功能(n= 6, 54.5%)、疲劳(n= 6, 54.5%)和疼痛(n= 6, 54.5%)。在23/35项试验(65.7%)中,两组之间至少有一个EORTC QLQ-C30结构域存在统计学意义和/或临床意义差异,最常见的改善领域是GHS/QoL(12/23项试验)、疼痛(11/23项试验)、疲劳(9/23项试验)和身体功能(9/23项试验)。PRO与PFS在19/33(57.6%)项试验中一致(p = 0.398),与OS在22/31(71%)项试验中一致(p = 0.018)。我们的研究确定了关键的PRO结构域,可以潜在地用作MM随机对照试验的主要终点。此外,PROs和OS之间的显著相关性突出了整合PROs以更好地捕捉治疗疗效的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-reported outcome domains in multiple myeloma randomized controlled trials and association with survival outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial endpoints in multiple myeloma (MM) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet there is significant variability in their methodology and reporting. Our study aimed to (a) identify the most commonly pre-specified PRO domains in MM RCTs and those most responsive to modern therapies, and (b) examine the association between PROs and progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). We performed a systematic review of MM RCTs that used EORTC QLQ-C30 and published between 01/2014-06/2023. The association between PFS/OS and PRO was explored using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test. Thirty-five RCTs were identified, with PROs as secondary or exploratory endpoints in all studies. About one-third of RCTs (n=11, 31.4%) pre-specified at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain, with the most common domains being Global health status/Quality of life (GHS/QoL) (n = 10, 90.9%), Physical Functioning (n = 6, 54.5%), Fatigue (n = 6, 54.5%), and Pain (n = 6, 54.5%). A statistically significant and/or clinically meaningful difference in at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 domain between arms was seen in 23/35 trials (65.7%), with the most common domains showing improvement being GHS/QoL (12/23 trials), Pain (11/23 trials), Fatigue (9/23 trials), and Physical Functioning (9/23 trials). PRO was noted to be concordant with PFS in 19/33 (57.6%) trials (p = 0.398), and with OS in 22/31 (71%) trials (p = 0.018). Our study identified key PRO domains that can be potentially used as primary endpoint in MM RCTs. Additionally, significant association between PROs and OS highlight the importance of integrating PROs to better capture treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
期刊最新文献
Complete remission induced by rituximab-lenalidomide, following CAR-T cell failure, is not associated with CAR-T cell re-expansion in the peripheral blood. Cost-utility analysis of ropeginterferon alfa-2b to manage low-risk patients with polycythemia vera as compared to phlebotomy only in the Austrian healthcare system. How I diagnose and treat patients in the pre-fibrotic phase of primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) - practical approaches of a German expert panel discussion in 2024. Molecular landscape of CD8+ T cells in pure red cell aplasia. Genital graft versus host disease in women after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - a single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1